Variability in measurements of pancreatic cyst size among EUS, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging modalities

Santo Maimone, Deepak Agrawal, Michael J. Pollack, Richard C K Wong, Joseph Willis, Ashley L. Faulx, Gerard A. Isenberg, Amitabh Chak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Cyst size is an important factor in the management of pancreatic cysts, both in predicting the need for surgery and the frequency of follow-up. Objective: To determine agreement and precision of EUS, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities in the evaluation of pancreatic cyst diameter. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Tertiary-care center, January 2000 to June 2009. Patients: This study involved 175 patients presenting for EUS evaluation of pancreatic cysts, with size measured by at least two of the aforementioned imaging studies within a 90-day period. Main Outcome Measurements: Largest cyst diameter from EUS, CT, MRI/MRCP, and surgical pathology. Results: A total of 175 patients underwent EUS. Seventy-three had CT plus EUS, 33 had MRI/MRCP plus EUS, 23 had MRI/MRCP plus CT, and 15 had all imaging studies, occurring within 90 days of each other. Median size differences between studies: EUS and CT (ie, absolute value of size determined by EUS minus size determined by CT) = 4 mm (range 0-25 mm), EUS and MRI = 4 mm (range 0-17 mm), CT and MRI = 3 mm (range 2-20 mm). Median size differences for surgical pathology specimens compared with results of 12 EUS, 13 CT, and 8 MRI/MRCP studies were as follows: EUS and pathology = 9.5 mm (range 0-20 mm), CT and pathology = 5 mm (range 0-21 mm), MRI and pathology = 5.5 mm (range 2-44 mm). Limitations: Interobserver variability and small sample of surgical pathology cysts. Conclusion: There is considerable variation in size estimates of pancreatic cysts by different imaging modalities, which practitioners should take into account when making management decisions. Use of a single imaging modality is recommended during follow-up. The precision of imaging studies for measuring pancreatic cysts must be prospectively defined if change in size is to be reliably used for clinical management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)945-950
Number of pages6
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume71
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

Pancreatic Cyst
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Surgical Pathology
Cysts
Pathology
Observer Variation
Tertiary Care Centers
Decision Making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Maimone, S., Agrawal, D., Pollack, M. J., Wong, R. C. K., Willis, J., Faulx, A. L., ... Chak, A. (2010). Variability in measurements of pancreatic cyst size among EUS, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging modalities. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 71(6), 945-950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.046

Variability in measurements of pancreatic cyst size among EUS, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging modalities. / Maimone, Santo; Agrawal, Deepak; Pollack, Michael J.; Wong, Richard C K; Willis, Joseph; Faulx, Ashley L.; Isenberg, Gerard A.; Chak, Amitabh.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 71, No. 6, 05.2010, p. 945-950.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Maimone, S, Agrawal, D, Pollack, MJ, Wong, RCK, Willis, J, Faulx, AL, Isenberg, GA & Chak, A 2010, 'Variability in measurements of pancreatic cyst size among EUS, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging modalities', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 945-950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.046
Maimone, Santo ; Agrawal, Deepak ; Pollack, Michael J. ; Wong, Richard C K ; Willis, Joseph ; Faulx, Ashley L. ; Isenberg, Gerard A. ; Chak, Amitabh. / Variability in measurements of pancreatic cyst size among EUS, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging modalities. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2010 ; Vol. 71, No. 6. pp. 945-950.
@article{8c6c58638fa24103bb4e3c255f0e1011,
title = "Variability in measurements of pancreatic cyst size among EUS, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging modalities",
abstract = "Background: Cyst size is an important factor in the management of pancreatic cysts, both in predicting the need for surgery and the frequency of follow-up. Objective: To determine agreement and precision of EUS, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities in the evaluation of pancreatic cyst diameter. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Tertiary-care center, January 2000 to June 2009. Patients: This study involved 175 patients presenting for EUS evaluation of pancreatic cysts, with size measured by at least two of the aforementioned imaging studies within a 90-day period. Main Outcome Measurements: Largest cyst diameter from EUS, CT, MRI/MRCP, and surgical pathology. Results: A total of 175 patients underwent EUS. Seventy-three had CT plus EUS, 33 had MRI/MRCP plus EUS, 23 had MRI/MRCP plus CT, and 15 had all imaging studies, occurring within 90 days of each other. Median size differences between studies: EUS and CT (ie, absolute value of size determined by EUS minus size determined by CT) = 4 mm (range 0-25 mm), EUS and MRI = 4 mm (range 0-17 mm), CT and MRI = 3 mm (range 2-20 mm). Median size differences for surgical pathology specimens compared with results of 12 EUS, 13 CT, and 8 MRI/MRCP studies were as follows: EUS and pathology = 9.5 mm (range 0-20 mm), CT and pathology = 5 mm (range 0-21 mm), MRI and pathology = 5.5 mm (range 2-44 mm). Limitations: Interobserver variability and small sample of surgical pathology cysts. Conclusion: There is considerable variation in size estimates of pancreatic cysts by different imaging modalities, which practitioners should take into account when making management decisions. Use of a single imaging modality is recommended during follow-up. The precision of imaging studies for measuring pancreatic cysts must be prospectively defined if change in size is to be reliably used for clinical management.",
author = "Santo Maimone and Deepak Agrawal and Pollack, {Michael J.} and Wong, {Richard C K} and Joseph Willis and Faulx, {Ashley L.} and Isenberg, {Gerard A.} and Amitabh Chak",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.046",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "945--950",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variability in measurements of pancreatic cyst size among EUS, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging modalities

AU - Maimone, Santo

AU - Agrawal, Deepak

AU - Pollack, Michael J.

AU - Wong, Richard C K

AU - Willis, Joseph

AU - Faulx, Ashley L.

AU - Isenberg, Gerard A.

AU - Chak, Amitabh

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Background: Cyst size is an important factor in the management of pancreatic cysts, both in predicting the need for surgery and the frequency of follow-up. Objective: To determine agreement and precision of EUS, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities in the evaluation of pancreatic cyst diameter. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Tertiary-care center, January 2000 to June 2009. Patients: This study involved 175 patients presenting for EUS evaluation of pancreatic cysts, with size measured by at least two of the aforementioned imaging studies within a 90-day period. Main Outcome Measurements: Largest cyst diameter from EUS, CT, MRI/MRCP, and surgical pathology. Results: A total of 175 patients underwent EUS. Seventy-three had CT plus EUS, 33 had MRI/MRCP plus EUS, 23 had MRI/MRCP plus CT, and 15 had all imaging studies, occurring within 90 days of each other. Median size differences between studies: EUS and CT (ie, absolute value of size determined by EUS minus size determined by CT) = 4 mm (range 0-25 mm), EUS and MRI = 4 mm (range 0-17 mm), CT and MRI = 3 mm (range 2-20 mm). Median size differences for surgical pathology specimens compared with results of 12 EUS, 13 CT, and 8 MRI/MRCP studies were as follows: EUS and pathology = 9.5 mm (range 0-20 mm), CT and pathology = 5 mm (range 0-21 mm), MRI and pathology = 5.5 mm (range 2-44 mm). Limitations: Interobserver variability and small sample of surgical pathology cysts. Conclusion: There is considerable variation in size estimates of pancreatic cysts by different imaging modalities, which practitioners should take into account when making management decisions. Use of a single imaging modality is recommended during follow-up. The precision of imaging studies for measuring pancreatic cysts must be prospectively defined if change in size is to be reliably used for clinical management.

AB - Background: Cyst size is an important factor in the management of pancreatic cysts, both in predicting the need for surgery and the frequency of follow-up. Objective: To determine agreement and precision of EUS, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities in the evaluation of pancreatic cyst diameter. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Tertiary-care center, January 2000 to June 2009. Patients: This study involved 175 patients presenting for EUS evaluation of pancreatic cysts, with size measured by at least two of the aforementioned imaging studies within a 90-day period. Main Outcome Measurements: Largest cyst diameter from EUS, CT, MRI/MRCP, and surgical pathology. Results: A total of 175 patients underwent EUS. Seventy-three had CT plus EUS, 33 had MRI/MRCP plus EUS, 23 had MRI/MRCP plus CT, and 15 had all imaging studies, occurring within 90 days of each other. Median size differences between studies: EUS and CT (ie, absolute value of size determined by EUS minus size determined by CT) = 4 mm (range 0-25 mm), EUS and MRI = 4 mm (range 0-17 mm), CT and MRI = 3 mm (range 2-20 mm). Median size differences for surgical pathology specimens compared with results of 12 EUS, 13 CT, and 8 MRI/MRCP studies were as follows: EUS and pathology = 9.5 mm (range 0-20 mm), CT and pathology = 5 mm (range 0-21 mm), MRI and pathology = 5.5 mm (range 2-44 mm). Limitations: Interobserver variability and small sample of surgical pathology cysts. Conclusion: There is considerable variation in size estimates of pancreatic cysts by different imaging modalities, which practitioners should take into account when making management decisions. Use of a single imaging modality is recommended during follow-up. The precision of imaging studies for measuring pancreatic cysts must be prospectively defined if change in size is to be reliably used for clinical management.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951623662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951623662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.046

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.046

M3 - Article

C2 - 20231021

AN - SCOPUS:77951623662

VL - 71

SP - 945

EP - 950

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 6

ER -