Variability in testing for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies: A survey of participants in the College of American Pathologists proficiency testing program

William J. Karlon, Stanley J. Naides, John T. Crosson, Mohammad Qasim Ansari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Context. - Variability in testing for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) contributes to confusion and controversy related to testing for vasculitis and other ANCA-associated diseases. Objectives. - To survey laboratory testing practices regarding ANCA testing and to investigate differences in testing algorithms. Design. - Supplemental questions were sent to the 333 laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists proficiency testing program for ANCA as part of the Special Immunology S2 Survey. Results. - A total of 315 laboratories submitted responses to the supplemental questions. Only 88 of 315 participants (28%) reported using a combination of indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) techniques as recommended by current guidelines, with a few additional labs using IFA and multiplex bead assay as an acceptable alternative to EIA. Other labs reported using only IFA, EIA, or multiplex bead assays. Conclusions. - A wide variety of testing algorithms are in use for ANCA testing despite evidence to suggest that a combination of IFA and EIA testing provides the most comprehensive information. Laboratories should inform clinicians clearly about testing practices and utility of testing in specific disease states.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)524-528
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Volume140
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies
Immunoenzyme Techniques
Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Technique
Vasculitis
Allergy and Immunology
Pathologists
Surveys and Questionnaires
Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Medical Laboratory Technology

Cite this

Variability in testing for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies : A survey of participants in the College of American Pathologists proficiency testing program. / Karlon, William J.; Naides, Stanley J.; Crosson, John T.; Ansari, Mohammad Qasim.

In: Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 140, No. 6, 01.06.2016, p. 524-528.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e93c6148ddee40fab4767c3474aa36b5,
title = "Variability in testing for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies: A survey of participants in the College of American Pathologists proficiency testing program",
abstract = "Context. - Variability in testing for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) contributes to confusion and controversy related to testing for vasculitis and other ANCA-associated diseases. Objectives. - To survey laboratory testing practices regarding ANCA testing and to investigate differences in testing algorithms. Design. - Supplemental questions were sent to the 333 laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists proficiency testing program for ANCA as part of the Special Immunology S2 Survey. Results. - A total of 315 laboratories submitted responses to the supplemental questions. Only 88 of 315 participants (28{\%}) reported using a combination of indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) techniques as recommended by current guidelines, with a few additional labs using IFA and multiplex bead assay as an acceptable alternative to EIA. Other labs reported using only IFA, EIA, or multiplex bead assays. Conclusions. - A wide variety of testing algorithms are in use for ANCA testing despite evidence to suggest that a combination of IFA and EIA testing provides the most comprehensive information. Laboratories should inform clinicians clearly about testing practices and utility of testing in specific disease states.",
author = "Karlon, {William J.} and Naides, {Stanley J.} and Crosson, {John T.} and Ansari, {Mohammad Qasim}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5858/arpa.2015-0221-CP",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "140",
pages = "524--528",
journal = "Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine",
issn = "0003-9985",
publisher = "College of American Pathologists",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variability in testing for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies

T2 - A survey of participants in the College of American Pathologists proficiency testing program

AU - Karlon, William J.

AU - Naides, Stanley J.

AU - Crosson, John T.

AU - Ansari, Mohammad Qasim

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Context. - Variability in testing for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) contributes to confusion and controversy related to testing for vasculitis and other ANCA-associated diseases. Objectives. - To survey laboratory testing practices regarding ANCA testing and to investigate differences in testing algorithms. Design. - Supplemental questions were sent to the 333 laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists proficiency testing program for ANCA as part of the Special Immunology S2 Survey. Results. - A total of 315 laboratories submitted responses to the supplemental questions. Only 88 of 315 participants (28%) reported using a combination of indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) techniques as recommended by current guidelines, with a few additional labs using IFA and multiplex bead assay as an acceptable alternative to EIA. Other labs reported using only IFA, EIA, or multiplex bead assays. Conclusions. - A wide variety of testing algorithms are in use for ANCA testing despite evidence to suggest that a combination of IFA and EIA testing provides the most comprehensive information. Laboratories should inform clinicians clearly about testing practices and utility of testing in specific disease states.

AB - Context. - Variability in testing for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) contributes to confusion and controversy related to testing for vasculitis and other ANCA-associated diseases. Objectives. - To survey laboratory testing practices regarding ANCA testing and to investigate differences in testing algorithms. Design. - Supplemental questions were sent to the 333 laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists proficiency testing program for ANCA as part of the Special Immunology S2 Survey. Results. - A total of 315 laboratories submitted responses to the supplemental questions. Only 88 of 315 participants (28%) reported using a combination of indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) techniques as recommended by current guidelines, with a few additional labs using IFA and multiplex bead assay as an acceptable alternative to EIA. Other labs reported using only IFA, EIA, or multiplex bead assays. Conclusions. - A wide variety of testing algorithms are in use for ANCA testing despite evidence to suggest that a combination of IFA and EIA testing provides the most comprehensive information. Laboratories should inform clinicians clearly about testing practices and utility of testing in specific disease states.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971450125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971450125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5858/arpa.2015-0221-CP

DO - 10.5858/arpa.2015-0221-CP

M3 - Article

C2 - 27232346

AN - SCOPUS:84971450125

VL - 140

SP - 524

EP - 528

JO - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

JF - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

SN - 0003-9985

IS - 6

ER -