Vascular bone transfer options in the foot and ankle: A retrospective review and update on strategies

Nicholas T. Haddock, Keith Wapner, L. Scott Levin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The foot and ankle area has a tenuous blood supply that can easily be damaged with trauma or open exposures. The navicular and talus are susceptible to avascular necrosis, making arthrodesis difficult. In addition, in this region, large bone gaps occur as a result of avascular necrosis, trauma, or infection. Often, vascularized bone flaps are required for reconstruction or salvage. METHODS: A retrospective review of all vascularized bone flaps to the foot and ankle performed by the senior surgeon (L.S.L) from July of 2006 to July of 2012 was performed. Twelve cases were identified (seven fibula flaps and five medial femoral condyle flaps). Indications included talus avascular necrosis with tibiotalar and subtalar arthritis (n = 8), talus avascular necrosis with tibiotalar arthritis (n = 1), navicular avascular necrosis (n = 1), talus persistent nonunion (n = 1), and a traumatic bone defect (n = 1). RESULTS: There were no flap failures or thrombotic events. Ankle stabilization was performed with plates (n = 5), compression screws (n = 2), external fixator (n = 4), and a cast (n = 1). There were three complications requiring return to the operating room. All patients ultimately obtained union, and full weight bearing was allowed at 18.7 ± 13.6 weeks after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have successfully used the medial femoral condyle flap and fibula flap for tibiotalar arthrodesis, pantalar arthrodesis, navicular revascularization, and persistent nonunion of the talus. The medial femoral condyle is ideal when a small segment of vascularized bone is required, but when structural support is necessary, the fibula offers a larger cortical surface area, providing more rigidity. Both flaps are valid options for foot and ankle reconstruction and salvage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)685-693
Number of pages9
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume132
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Ankle
Blood Vessels
Foot
Talus
Bone and Bones
Necrosis
Fibula
Arthrodesis
Thigh
Arthritis
External Fixators
Wounds and Injuries
Weight-Bearing
Operating Rooms
Infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Vascular bone transfer options in the foot and ankle : A retrospective review and update on strategies. / Haddock, Nicholas T.; Wapner, Keith; Levin, L. Scott.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 132, No. 3, 2013, p. 685-693.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bce6cb6b7bd745a8a64cc889542de87a,
title = "Vascular bone transfer options in the foot and ankle: A retrospective review and update on strategies",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The foot and ankle area has a tenuous blood supply that can easily be damaged with trauma or open exposures. The navicular and talus are susceptible to avascular necrosis, making arthrodesis difficult. In addition, in this region, large bone gaps occur as a result of avascular necrosis, trauma, or infection. Often, vascularized bone flaps are required for reconstruction or salvage. METHODS: A retrospective review of all vascularized bone flaps to the foot and ankle performed by the senior surgeon (L.S.L) from July of 2006 to July of 2012 was performed. Twelve cases were identified (seven fibula flaps and five medial femoral condyle flaps). Indications included talus avascular necrosis with tibiotalar and subtalar arthritis (n = 8), talus avascular necrosis with tibiotalar arthritis (n = 1), navicular avascular necrosis (n = 1), talus persistent nonunion (n = 1), and a traumatic bone defect (n = 1). RESULTS: There were no flap failures or thrombotic events. Ankle stabilization was performed with plates (n = 5), compression screws (n = 2), external fixator (n = 4), and a cast (n = 1). There were three complications requiring return to the operating room. All patients ultimately obtained union, and full weight bearing was allowed at 18.7 ± 13.6 weeks after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have successfully used the medial femoral condyle flap and fibula flap for tibiotalar arthrodesis, pantalar arthrodesis, navicular revascularization, and persistent nonunion of the talus. The medial femoral condyle is ideal when a small segment of vascularized bone is required, but when structural support is necessary, the fibula offers a larger cortical surface area, providing more rigidity. Both flaps are valid options for foot and ankle reconstruction and salvage.",
author = "Haddock, {Nicholas T.} and Keith Wapner and Levin, {L. Scott}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829acedd",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "132",
pages = "685--693",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vascular bone transfer options in the foot and ankle

T2 - A retrospective review and update on strategies

AU - Haddock, Nicholas T.

AU - Wapner, Keith

AU - Levin, L. Scott

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - BACKGROUND: The foot and ankle area has a tenuous blood supply that can easily be damaged with trauma or open exposures. The navicular and talus are susceptible to avascular necrosis, making arthrodesis difficult. In addition, in this region, large bone gaps occur as a result of avascular necrosis, trauma, or infection. Often, vascularized bone flaps are required for reconstruction or salvage. METHODS: A retrospective review of all vascularized bone flaps to the foot and ankle performed by the senior surgeon (L.S.L) from July of 2006 to July of 2012 was performed. Twelve cases were identified (seven fibula flaps and five medial femoral condyle flaps). Indications included talus avascular necrosis with tibiotalar and subtalar arthritis (n = 8), talus avascular necrosis with tibiotalar arthritis (n = 1), navicular avascular necrosis (n = 1), talus persistent nonunion (n = 1), and a traumatic bone defect (n = 1). RESULTS: There were no flap failures or thrombotic events. Ankle stabilization was performed with plates (n = 5), compression screws (n = 2), external fixator (n = 4), and a cast (n = 1). There were three complications requiring return to the operating room. All patients ultimately obtained union, and full weight bearing was allowed at 18.7 ± 13.6 weeks after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have successfully used the medial femoral condyle flap and fibula flap for tibiotalar arthrodesis, pantalar arthrodesis, navicular revascularization, and persistent nonunion of the talus. The medial femoral condyle is ideal when a small segment of vascularized bone is required, but when structural support is necessary, the fibula offers a larger cortical surface area, providing more rigidity. Both flaps are valid options for foot and ankle reconstruction and salvage.

AB - BACKGROUND: The foot and ankle area has a tenuous blood supply that can easily be damaged with trauma or open exposures. The navicular and talus are susceptible to avascular necrosis, making arthrodesis difficult. In addition, in this region, large bone gaps occur as a result of avascular necrosis, trauma, or infection. Often, vascularized bone flaps are required for reconstruction or salvage. METHODS: A retrospective review of all vascularized bone flaps to the foot and ankle performed by the senior surgeon (L.S.L) from July of 2006 to July of 2012 was performed. Twelve cases were identified (seven fibula flaps and five medial femoral condyle flaps). Indications included talus avascular necrosis with tibiotalar and subtalar arthritis (n = 8), talus avascular necrosis with tibiotalar arthritis (n = 1), navicular avascular necrosis (n = 1), talus persistent nonunion (n = 1), and a traumatic bone defect (n = 1). RESULTS: There were no flap failures or thrombotic events. Ankle stabilization was performed with plates (n = 5), compression screws (n = 2), external fixator (n = 4), and a cast (n = 1). There were three complications requiring return to the operating room. All patients ultimately obtained union, and full weight bearing was allowed at 18.7 ± 13.6 weeks after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have successfully used the medial femoral condyle flap and fibula flap for tibiotalar arthrodesis, pantalar arthrodesis, navicular revascularization, and persistent nonunion of the talus. The medial femoral condyle is ideal when a small segment of vascularized bone is required, but when structural support is necessary, the fibula offers a larger cortical surface area, providing more rigidity. Both flaps are valid options for foot and ankle reconstruction and salvage.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883598273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883598273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829acedd

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829acedd

M3 - Article

C2 - 23676967

AN - SCOPUS:84883598273

VL - 132

SP - 685

EP - 693

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 3

ER -