Vascular proximity: Is it a valid indication for arteriography in asymptomatic patients?

H. Francis, E. R. Thal, J. A. Weigelt, H. C. Redman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The role of arteriography in asymptomatic patients with penetrating extremity wounds in proximity to major vessels is controversial. This prospective study was designed to evaluate a precise definition of proximity, determine the incidence of positive arteriograms, and correlate angiographic interpretation with operative findings. Proximity was defined as any wound located within 1 cm of a major vessel. Excluded were patients with a pulse deficit, bruit, thrill, history of arterial hemorrhage, expanding hematoma, nerve deficit, fracture, or significant soft-tissue injury. One hundred sixty arteriograms were performed in 146 patients. One hundred forty-three (89.4%) were true-negatives. Seventeen (10.6%) were suggestive of injury. These included seven (4.4%) true-positive arteriograms, six (3.8%) false-positive studies, and four (2.5%) positive arteriograms in patients who were not operated upon. The angiographic report correlated with operative findings in five (38.5%) of 13 patients. These data confirm the low incidence (4.4%) of vascular injury in asymptomatic patients. The use of extremity angiogrpahy when proximity is the sole indication in an asymptomatic patient with a normal vascular examination must be questioned.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)512-514
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Trauma
Volume31
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1991

Fingerprint

Blood Vessels
Angiography
Extremities
Penetrating Wounds
Soft Tissue Injuries
Vascular System Injuries
Incidence
Wounds and Injuries
Hematoma
Pulse
Prospective Studies
Hemorrhage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Francis, H., Thal, E. R., Weigelt, J. A., & Redman, H. C. (1991). Vascular proximity: Is it a valid indication for arteriography in asymptomatic patients? Journal of Trauma, 31(4), 512-514.

Vascular proximity : Is it a valid indication for arteriography in asymptomatic patients? / Francis, H.; Thal, E. R.; Weigelt, J. A.; Redman, H. C.

In: Journal of Trauma, Vol. 31, No. 4, 1991, p. 512-514.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Francis, H, Thal, ER, Weigelt, JA & Redman, HC 1991, 'Vascular proximity: Is it a valid indication for arteriography in asymptomatic patients?', Journal of Trauma, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 512-514.
Francis, H. ; Thal, E. R. ; Weigelt, J. A. ; Redman, H. C. / Vascular proximity : Is it a valid indication for arteriography in asymptomatic patients?. In: Journal of Trauma. 1991 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 512-514.
@article{f75b4bebde19402f9ef75572256faeec,
title = "Vascular proximity: Is it a valid indication for arteriography in asymptomatic patients?",
abstract = "The role of arteriography in asymptomatic patients with penetrating extremity wounds in proximity to major vessels is controversial. This prospective study was designed to evaluate a precise definition of proximity, determine the incidence of positive arteriograms, and correlate angiographic interpretation with operative findings. Proximity was defined as any wound located within 1 cm of a major vessel. Excluded were patients with a pulse deficit, bruit, thrill, history of arterial hemorrhage, expanding hematoma, nerve deficit, fracture, or significant soft-tissue injury. One hundred sixty arteriograms were performed in 146 patients. One hundred forty-three (89.4{\%}) were true-negatives. Seventeen (10.6{\%}) were suggestive of injury. These included seven (4.4{\%}) true-positive arteriograms, six (3.8{\%}) false-positive studies, and four (2.5{\%}) positive arteriograms in patients who were not operated upon. The angiographic report correlated with operative findings in five (38.5{\%}) of 13 patients. These data confirm the low incidence (4.4{\%}) of vascular injury in asymptomatic patients. The use of extremity angiogrpahy when proximity is the sole indication in an asymptomatic patient with a normal vascular examination must be questioned.",
author = "H. Francis and Thal, {E. R.} and Weigelt, {J. A.} and Redman, {H. C.}",
year = "1991",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "512--514",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vascular proximity

T2 - Is it a valid indication for arteriography in asymptomatic patients?

AU - Francis, H.

AU - Thal, E. R.

AU - Weigelt, J. A.

AU - Redman, H. C.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - The role of arteriography in asymptomatic patients with penetrating extremity wounds in proximity to major vessels is controversial. This prospective study was designed to evaluate a precise definition of proximity, determine the incidence of positive arteriograms, and correlate angiographic interpretation with operative findings. Proximity was defined as any wound located within 1 cm of a major vessel. Excluded were patients with a pulse deficit, bruit, thrill, history of arterial hemorrhage, expanding hematoma, nerve deficit, fracture, or significant soft-tissue injury. One hundred sixty arteriograms were performed in 146 patients. One hundred forty-three (89.4%) were true-negatives. Seventeen (10.6%) were suggestive of injury. These included seven (4.4%) true-positive arteriograms, six (3.8%) false-positive studies, and four (2.5%) positive arteriograms in patients who were not operated upon. The angiographic report correlated with operative findings in five (38.5%) of 13 patients. These data confirm the low incidence (4.4%) of vascular injury in asymptomatic patients. The use of extremity angiogrpahy when proximity is the sole indication in an asymptomatic patient with a normal vascular examination must be questioned.

AB - The role of arteriography in asymptomatic patients with penetrating extremity wounds in proximity to major vessels is controversial. This prospective study was designed to evaluate a precise definition of proximity, determine the incidence of positive arteriograms, and correlate angiographic interpretation with operative findings. Proximity was defined as any wound located within 1 cm of a major vessel. Excluded were patients with a pulse deficit, bruit, thrill, history of arterial hemorrhage, expanding hematoma, nerve deficit, fracture, or significant soft-tissue injury. One hundred sixty arteriograms were performed in 146 patients. One hundred forty-three (89.4%) were true-negatives. Seventeen (10.6%) were suggestive of injury. These included seven (4.4%) true-positive arteriograms, six (3.8%) false-positive studies, and four (2.5%) positive arteriograms in patients who were not operated upon. The angiographic report correlated with operative findings in five (38.5%) of 13 patients. These data confirm the low incidence (4.4%) of vascular injury in asymptomatic patients. The use of extremity angiogrpahy when proximity is the sole indication in an asymptomatic patient with a normal vascular examination must be questioned.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025811913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025811913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2020037

AN - SCOPUS:0025811913

VL - 31

SP - 512

EP - 514

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 4

ER -