Visibility of simulated microcalcifications - A hardcopy-based comparison of three mammographic systems

Chao Jen Lai, Chris C. Shaw, Gary J. Whitman, Dennis A. Johnston, Wei T. Yang, Veronica Selinko, Elsa Arribas, Basak Dogan, S. Cheenu Kappadath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Full-field digital mammography systems are currently available for clinical use. These digital systems offer improved image quality, flexible image processing, display, storage, retrieval, and transmission. These systems employ a variety of different x-ray detectors based on storage phosphors (in computed radiography), charge-coupled devices (CCDs), or amorphous silicon flat panels (FPs). The objective of this study is to compare three different types of mammographic detectors: screen-film (SF) combination, a CsI-based FP detector, a CCD and x-ray phosphor-based detector for their performance in detection of simulated microcalcifications. Microcalcifications (MCs) were simulated with calcium carbonate grains of various sizes (90-355 μm). They were overlapped with a slab of simulated 50% adipose/50% glandular breast tissue for a uniform background or an anthropomorphic breast phantom for a tissue structure background. Images of the phantoms, acquired with and without magnification, were reviewed by mammographers, physicists, and students. A five-point confidence level rating was given for each MC reviewed. Average ratings from the mammographers were used to compare the performances of the three imaging systems, various MC size groups, and two magnification modes. The results indicate that with uniform background and no magnification, the FP system performed the best while the SF system did slightly better than the CCD system. With magnification added, all detection tasks were improved except for the smallest and largest one or two size groups. In particular, detection in the SF and CCD images was significantly improved over that in the FP images. With tissue structure background and no magnification, the FP system was outperformed by the SF and the CCD systems. With magnification added, the performance of the FP and the CCD systems was improved significantly. With this improvement, the SF and FP systems were outperformed by the CCD system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)182-194
Number of pages13
JournalMedical Physics
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

Calcinosis
Equipment and Supplies
Breast
X-Rays
Calcium Carbonate
Silicon
Mammography
Radiography
Students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Lai, C. J., Shaw, C. C., Whitman, G. J., Johnston, D. A., Yang, W. T., Selinko, V., ... Kappadath, S. C. (2005). Visibility of simulated microcalcifications - A hardcopy-based comparison of three mammographic systems. Medical Physics, 32(1), 182-194. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1833011

Visibility of simulated microcalcifications - A hardcopy-based comparison of three mammographic systems. / Lai, Chao Jen; Shaw, Chris C.; Whitman, Gary J.; Johnston, Dennis A.; Yang, Wei T.; Selinko, Veronica; Arribas, Elsa; Dogan, Basak; Kappadath, S. Cheenu.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 32, No. 1, 01.01.2005, p. 182-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lai, CJ, Shaw, CC, Whitman, GJ, Johnston, DA, Yang, WT, Selinko, V, Arribas, E, Dogan, B & Kappadath, SC 2005, 'Visibility of simulated microcalcifications - A hardcopy-based comparison of three mammographic systems', Medical Physics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 182-194. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1833011
Lai, Chao Jen ; Shaw, Chris C. ; Whitman, Gary J. ; Johnston, Dennis A. ; Yang, Wei T. ; Selinko, Veronica ; Arribas, Elsa ; Dogan, Basak ; Kappadath, S. Cheenu. / Visibility of simulated microcalcifications - A hardcopy-based comparison of three mammographic systems. In: Medical Physics. 2005 ; Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 182-194.
@article{cca962b924154bb28f0decce894145a3,
title = "Visibility of simulated microcalcifications - A hardcopy-based comparison of three mammographic systems",
abstract = "Full-field digital mammography systems are currently available for clinical use. These digital systems offer improved image quality, flexible image processing, display, storage, retrieval, and transmission. These systems employ a variety of different x-ray detectors based on storage phosphors (in computed radiography), charge-coupled devices (CCDs), or amorphous silicon flat panels (FPs). The objective of this study is to compare three different types of mammographic detectors: screen-film (SF) combination, a CsI-based FP detector, a CCD and x-ray phosphor-based detector for their performance in detection of simulated microcalcifications. Microcalcifications (MCs) were simulated with calcium carbonate grains of various sizes (90-355 μm). They were overlapped with a slab of simulated 50{\%} adipose/50{\%} glandular breast tissue for a uniform background or an anthropomorphic breast phantom for a tissue structure background. Images of the phantoms, acquired with and without magnification, were reviewed by mammographers, physicists, and students. A five-point confidence level rating was given for each MC reviewed. Average ratings from the mammographers were used to compare the performances of the three imaging systems, various MC size groups, and two magnification modes. The results indicate that with uniform background and no magnification, the FP system performed the best while the SF system did slightly better than the CCD system. With magnification added, all detection tasks were improved except for the smallest and largest one or two size groups. In particular, detection in the SF and CCD images was significantly improved over that in the FP images. With tissue structure background and no magnification, the FP system was outperformed by the SF and the CCD systems. With magnification added, the performance of the FP and the CCD systems was improved significantly. With this improvement, the SF and FP systems were outperformed by the CCD system.",
author = "Lai, {Chao Jen} and Shaw, {Chris C.} and Whitman, {Gary J.} and Johnston, {Dennis A.} and Yang, {Wei T.} and Veronica Selinko and Elsa Arribas and Basak Dogan and Kappadath, {S. Cheenu}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.1833011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "182--194",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visibility of simulated microcalcifications - A hardcopy-based comparison of three mammographic systems

AU - Lai, Chao Jen

AU - Shaw, Chris C.

AU - Whitman, Gary J.

AU - Johnston, Dennis A.

AU - Yang, Wei T.

AU - Selinko, Veronica

AU - Arribas, Elsa

AU - Dogan, Basak

AU - Kappadath, S. Cheenu

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - Full-field digital mammography systems are currently available for clinical use. These digital systems offer improved image quality, flexible image processing, display, storage, retrieval, and transmission. These systems employ a variety of different x-ray detectors based on storage phosphors (in computed radiography), charge-coupled devices (CCDs), or amorphous silicon flat panels (FPs). The objective of this study is to compare three different types of mammographic detectors: screen-film (SF) combination, a CsI-based FP detector, a CCD and x-ray phosphor-based detector for their performance in detection of simulated microcalcifications. Microcalcifications (MCs) were simulated with calcium carbonate grains of various sizes (90-355 μm). They were overlapped with a slab of simulated 50% adipose/50% glandular breast tissue for a uniform background or an anthropomorphic breast phantom for a tissue structure background. Images of the phantoms, acquired with and without magnification, were reviewed by mammographers, physicists, and students. A five-point confidence level rating was given for each MC reviewed. Average ratings from the mammographers were used to compare the performances of the three imaging systems, various MC size groups, and two magnification modes. The results indicate that with uniform background and no magnification, the FP system performed the best while the SF system did slightly better than the CCD system. With magnification added, all detection tasks were improved except for the smallest and largest one or two size groups. In particular, detection in the SF and CCD images was significantly improved over that in the FP images. With tissue structure background and no magnification, the FP system was outperformed by the SF and the CCD systems. With magnification added, the performance of the FP and the CCD systems was improved significantly. With this improvement, the SF and FP systems were outperformed by the CCD system.

AB - Full-field digital mammography systems are currently available for clinical use. These digital systems offer improved image quality, flexible image processing, display, storage, retrieval, and transmission. These systems employ a variety of different x-ray detectors based on storage phosphors (in computed radiography), charge-coupled devices (CCDs), or amorphous silicon flat panels (FPs). The objective of this study is to compare three different types of mammographic detectors: screen-film (SF) combination, a CsI-based FP detector, a CCD and x-ray phosphor-based detector for their performance in detection of simulated microcalcifications. Microcalcifications (MCs) were simulated with calcium carbonate grains of various sizes (90-355 μm). They were overlapped with a slab of simulated 50% adipose/50% glandular breast tissue for a uniform background or an anthropomorphic breast phantom for a tissue structure background. Images of the phantoms, acquired with and without magnification, were reviewed by mammographers, physicists, and students. A five-point confidence level rating was given for each MC reviewed. Average ratings from the mammographers were used to compare the performances of the three imaging systems, various MC size groups, and two magnification modes. The results indicate that with uniform background and no magnification, the FP system performed the best while the SF system did slightly better than the CCD system. With magnification added, all detection tasks were improved except for the smallest and largest one or two size groups. In particular, detection in the SF and CCD images was significantly improved over that in the FP images. With tissue structure background and no magnification, the FP system was outperformed by the SF and the CCD systems. With magnification added, the performance of the FP and the CCD systems was improved significantly. With this improvement, the SF and FP systems were outperformed by the CCD system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12844268023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12844268023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.1833011

DO - 10.1118/1.1833011

M3 - Article

C2 - 15719969

AN - SCOPUS:12844268023

VL - 32

SP - 182

EP - 194

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 1

ER -