Volumetric contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of renal perfusion

Marshall Mahoney, Anna Sorace, Jason Warram, Sharon Samuel, Kenneth Hoyt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives-To determine whether volumetric contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) imaging has the potential to monitor changes in renal perfusion after vascular injury. Methods-Volumetric contrast-enhanced US uses a series of planar image acquisitions, capturing the nonlinear second harmonic signal from microbubble contrast agents flowing in the vasculature. Tissue perfusion parameters (peak intensity [IPK], time to peak intensity [TPK], wash-in rate [WIR], and area under the curve [AUC]) were derived from time-intensity curve data collected during in vitro flow phantom studies and in vivo animal studies of healthy and injured kidneys. For the flow phantom studies, either the contrast agent concentration was held constant (10 μL/L) with varying volumetric flow rates (10, 20, and 30 mL/min), or the flow rate was held constant (30 mL/min) with varying contrast agent concentrations (5, 10, and 20 μL/L). Animal studies used healthy rats or those that underwent renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Renal studies were performed with healthy rats while the transducer angle was varied for each volumetric contrast-enhanced US image acquisition (reference or 0°, 45°, and 90°) to determine whether repeated renal perfusion measures were isotropic and independent of transducer position. Blood serum biomarkers and immunohistology were used to confirm acute kidney injury. Results-Flow phantom results revealed a linear relationship between microbubble concentrations injected into the flow system and the IPK, WIR, and AUC (R2 > 0.56; P < .005). Furthermore, there was a linear relationship between volume flow rate changes and the TPK , WIR, and AUC (R2 > 0.77; P < .005). No significant difference was found between the transducer angle during data acquisition and any of the perfusion measures (P > .60). After induction of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat animal model (n = 4), volumetric contrast-enhanced US imaging of the injured kidney revealed an initial reduction in renal perfusion compared to control animals, followed by progressive recovery of vascular function. Conclusions-Volumetric contrast-enhanced US-based renal perfusion imaging may prove clinically feasible for detecting and monitoring acute kidney injury.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1427-1437
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Volume33
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2014

Fingerprint

Ultrasonography
Perfusion
Kidney
Contrast Media
Microbubbles
Reperfusion Injury
Transducers
Acute Kidney Injury
Area Under Curve
Perfusion Imaging
Vascular System Injuries
Recovery of Function
Blood Vessels
Animal Models
Biomarkers
Serum

Keywords

  • Acute kidney injury
  • Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging
  • Microbubbles
  • Renal perfusion
  • Volumetric imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Volumetric contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of renal perfusion. / Mahoney, Marshall; Sorace, Anna; Warram, Jason; Samuel, Sharon; Hoyt, Kenneth.

In: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol. 33, No. 8, 01.08.2014, p. 1427-1437.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mahoney, Marshall ; Sorace, Anna ; Warram, Jason ; Samuel, Sharon ; Hoyt, Kenneth. / Volumetric contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of renal perfusion. In: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 33, No. 8. pp. 1427-1437.
@article{a9d6574cc4434fde987d226ebe676248,
title = "Volumetric contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of renal perfusion",
abstract = "Objectives-To determine whether volumetric contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) imaging has the potential to monitor changes in renal perfusion after vascular injury. Methods-Volumetric contrast-enhanced US uses a series of planar image acquisitions, capturing the nonlinear second harmonic signal from microbubble contrast agents flowing in the vasculature. Tissue perfusion parameters (peak intensity [IPK], time to peak intensity [TPK], wash-in rate [WIR], and area under the curve [AUC]) were derived from time-intensity curve data collected during in vitro flow phantom studies and in vivo animal studies of healthy and injured kidneys. For the flow phantom studies, either the contrast agent concentration was held constant (10 μL/L) with varying volumetric flow rates (10, 20, and 30 mL/min), or the flow rate was held constant (30 mL/min) with varying contrast agent concentrations (5, 10, and 20 μL/L). Animal studies used healthy rats or those that underwent renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Renal studies were performed with healthy rats while the transducer angle was varied for each volumetric contrast-enhanced US image acquisition (reference or 0°, 45°, and 90°) to determine whether repeated renal perfusion measures were isotropic and independent of transducer position. Blood serum biomarkers and immunohistology were used to confirm acute kidney injury. Results-Flow phantom results revealed a linear relationship between microbubble concentrations injected into the flow system and the IPK, WIR, and AUC (R2 > 0.56; P < .005). Furthermore, there was a linear relationship between volume flow rate changes and the TPK , WIR, and AUC (R2 > 0.77; P < .005). No significant difference was found between the transducer angle during data acquisition and any of the perfusion measures (P > .60). After induction of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat animal model (n = 4), volumetric contrast-enhanced US imaging of the injured kidney revealed an initial reduction in renal perfusion compared to control animals, followed by progressive recovery of vascular function. Conclusions-Volumetric contrast-enhanced US-based renal perfusion imaging may prove clinically feasible for detecting and monitoring acute kidney injury.",
keywords = "Acute kidney injury, Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging, Microbubbles, Renal perfusion, Volumetric imaging",
author = "Marshall Mahoney and Anna Sorace and Jason Warram and Sharon Samuel and Kenneth Hoyt",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7863/ultra.33.8.1427",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "1427--1437",
journal = "Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine",
issn = "0278-4297",
publisher = "American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Volumetric contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of renal perfusion

AU - Mahoney, Marshall

AU - Sorace, Anna

AU - Warram, Jason

AU - Samuel, Sharon

AU - Hoyt, Kenneth

PY - 2014/8/1

Y1 - 2014/8/1

N2 - Objectives-To determine whether volumetric contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) imaging has the potential to monitor changes in renal perfusion after vascular injury. Methods-Volumetric contrast-enhanced US uses a series of planar image acquisitions, capturing the nonlinear second harmonic signal from microbubble contrast agents flowing in the vasculature. Tissue perfusion parameters (peak intensity [IPK], time to peak intensity [TPK], wash-in rate [WIR], and area under the curve [AUC]) were derived from time-intensity curve data collected during in vitro flow phantom studies and in vivo animal studies of healthy and injured kidneys. For the flow phantom studies, either the contrast agent concentration was held constant (10 μL/L) with varying volumetric flow rates (10, 20, and 30 mL/min), or the flow rate was held constant (30 mL/min) with varying contrast agent concentrations (5, 10, and 20 μL/L). Animal studies used healthy rats or those that underwent renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Renal studies were performed with healthy rats while the transducer angle was varied for each volumetric contrast-enhanced US image acquisition (reference or 0°, 45°, and 90°) to determine whether repeated renal perfusion measures were isotropic and independent of transducer position. Blood serum biomarkers and immunohistology were used to confirm acute kidney injury. Results-Flow phantom results revealed a linear relationship between microbubble concentrations injected into the flow system and the IPK, WIR, and AUC (R2 > 0.56; P < .005). Furthermore, there was a linear relationship between volume flow rate changes and the TPK , WIR, and AUC (R2 > 0.77; P < .005). No significant difference was found between the transducer angle during data acquisition and any of the perfusion measures (P > .60). After induction of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat animal model (n = 4), volumetric contrast-enhanced US imaging of the injured kidney revealed an initial reduction in renal perfusion compared to control animals, followed by progressive recovery of vascular function. Conclusions-Volumetric contrast-enhanced US-based renal perfusion imaging may prove clinically feasible for detecting and monitoring acute kidney injury.

AB - Objectives-To determine whether volumetric contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) imaging has the potential to monitor changes in renal perfusion after vascular injury. Methods-Volumetric contrast-enhanced US uses a series of planar image acquisitions, capturing the nonlinear second harmonic signal from microbubble contrast agents flowing in the vasculature. Tissue perfusion parameters (peak intensity [IPK], time to peak intensity [TPK], wash-in rate [WIR], and area under the curve [AUC]) were derived from time-intensity curve data collected during in vitro flow phantom studies and in vivo animal studies of healthy and injured kidneys. For the flow phantom studies, either the contrast agent concentration was held constant (10 μL/L) with varying volumetric flow rates (10, 20, and 30 mL/min), or the flow rate was held constant (30 mL/min) with varying contrast agent concentrations (5, 10, and 20 μL/L). Animal studies used healthy rats or those that underwent renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Renal studies were performed with healthy rats while the transducer angle was varied for each volumetric contrast-enhanced US image acquisition (reference or 0°, 45°, and 90°) to determine whether repeated renal perfusion measures were isotropic and independent of transducer position. Blood serum biomarkers and immunohistology were used to confirm acute kidney injury. Results-Flow phantom results revealed a linear relationship between microbubble concentrations injected into the flow system and the IPK, WIR, and AUC (R2 > 0.56; P < .005). Furthermore, there was a linear relationship between volume flow rate changes and the TPK , WIR, and AUC (R2 > 0.77; P < .005). No significant difference was found between the transducer angle during data acquisition and any of the perfusion measures (P > .60). After induction of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat animal model (n = 4), volumetric contrast-enhanced US imaging of the injured kidney revealed an initial reduction in renal perfusion compared to control animals, followed by progressive recovery of vascular function. Conclusions-Volumetric contrast-enhanced US-based renal perfusion imaging may prove clinically feasible for detecting and monitoring acute kidney injury.

KW - Acute kidney injury

KW - Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging

KW - Microbubbles

KW - Renal perfusion

KW - Volumetric imaging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905754736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905754736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7863/ultra.33.8.1427

DO - 10.7863/ultra.33.8.1427

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 1427

EP - 1437

JO - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

JF - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

SN - 0278-4297

IS - 8

ER -