WE‐D‐BRC‐01: MR Imaging for Real‐Time Radiotherapy Guidance

k. Butts Pauly, A. Sawant, R. Fahrig, P. Keall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The exquisite soft tissue contrast, 3D imaging capability, and lack of radiation dose brings magnetic resonance imaging into consideration for guiding external beam radiation therapy of thoracic and abdominal tumors which undergo significant intrafraction motion. For example, in the case of lung cancer, which accounts for 13% of radiation therapy recipients, tumors may move on the order of 20 mm at a rate of 10 mm/s. MRI is ideally suited to continuously monitor the geometry of the tumor for real‐time modification to the treatment protocol. However, there are technical challenges to integrating a radiation therapy system into an MRI system. In this talk, we discuss the considerations for the MRI system in MR‐guided radiotherapy. For the MRI system geometry, several MR systems have been proposed that vary in field strength and system geometry. In the evaluation of these geometries, consideration should include system performance and requirements. Deviation from the conventional cylindrical MRI system affects the field strength, gradient performance, and magnetic field homogeneity. Even with a given magnet geometry, there are tradeoffs in the imaging choices that can be made. Since the signal‐to‐noise ratio is proportional to the field strength, the voxel volume, and the square root of the acquisition time, the voxel volume can be traded off for temporal resolution. Different pulse sequences have different inherent contrasts and signal levels. All of these affect the ability to perform the imaging task, but must be considered within the context of the goal to localize the boundary of the tumor target with sufficient temporal and spatial resolution. Other system considerations might include the use of radiation transparent RF coils. Another consideration is the effect on the MRI of other equipment. High magnetic susceptibility metals such as iron, steel, and many stainless steels experience large forces that would pull them into the MRI system. Lower magnetic susceptibility metals such as aluminum and lead can be safely used within the MRI magnetic field, although care must be taken to minimize eddy currents that may be induced in them, as this may affect imaging performance. Learning Objectives: 1. Understand the tradeoffs in imaging capabilities with different MRI system geometries 2. Understand the tradeoffs in MR imaging of tumors for real‐time therapy guidance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2774
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Radiotherapy
Magnetic Fields
Neoplasms
Metals
Radiation
Aptitude
Magnets
Steel
Stainless Steel
Clinical Protocols
Aluminum
Lung Neoplasms
Thorax
Iron
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Learning
Equipment and Supplies
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

WE‐D‐BRC‐01 : MR Imaging for Real‐Time Radiotherapy Guidance. / Pauly, k. Butts; Sawant, A.; Fahrig, R.; Keall, P.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2009, p. 2774.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pauly, KB, Sawant, A, Fahrig, R & Keall, P 2009, 'WE‐D‐BRC‐01: MR Imaging for Real‐Time Radiotherapy Guidance', Medical Physics, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 2774. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3182524
Pauly, k. Butts ; Sawant, A. ; Fahrig, R. ; Keall, P. / WE‐D‐BRC‐01 : MR Imaging for Real‐Time Radiotherapy Guidance. In: Medical Physics. 2009 ; Vol. 36, No. 6. pp. 2774.
@article{1bf8987a124549279c72aebe7bb856a3,
title = "WE‐D‐BRC‐01: MR Imaging for Real‐Time Radiotherapy Guidance",
abstract = "The exquisite soft tissue contrast, 3D imaging capability, and lack of radiation dose brings magnetic resonance imaging into consideration for guiding external beam radiation therapy of thoracic and abdominal tumors which undergo significant intrafraction motion. For example, in the case of lung cancer, which accounts for 13{\%} of radiation therapy recipients, tumors may move on the order of 20 mm at a rate of 10 mm/s. MRI is ideally suited to continuously monitor the geometry of the tumor for real‐time modification to the treatment protocol. However, there are technical challenges to integrating a radiation therapy system into an MRI system. In this talk, we discuss the considerations for the MRI system in MR‐guided radiotherapy. For the MRI system geometry, several MR systems have been proposed that vary in field strength and system geometry. In the evaluation of these geometries, consideration should include system performance and requirements. Deviation from the conventional cylindrical MRI system affects the field strength, gradient performance, and magnetic field homogeneity. Even with a given magnet geometry, there are tradeoffs in the imaging choices that can be made. Since the signal‐to‐noise ratio is proportional to the field strength, the voxel volume, and the square root of the acquisition time, the voxel volume can be traded off for temporal resolution. Different pulse sequences have different inherent contrasts and signal levels. All of these affect the ability to perform the imaging task, but must be considered within the context of the goal to localize the boundary of the tumor target with sufficient temporal and spatial resolution. Other system considerations might include the use of radiation transparent RF coils. Another consideration is the effect on the MRI of other equipment. High magnetic susceptibility metals such as iron, steel, and many stainless steels experience large forces that would pull them into the MRI system. Lower magnetic susceptibility metals such as aluminum and lead can be safely used within the MRI magnetic field, although care must be taken to minimize eddy currents that may be induced in them, as this may affect imaging performance. Learning Objectives: 1. Understand the tradeoffs in imaging capabilities with different MRI system geometries 2. Understand the tradeoffs in MR imaging of tumors for real‐time therapy guidance.",
author = "Pauly, {k. Butts} and A. Sawant and R. Fahrig and P. Keall",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1118/1.3182524",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "2774",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - WE‐D‐BRC‐01

T2 - MR Imaging for Real‐Time Radiotherapy Guidance

AU - Pauly, k. Butts

AU - Sawant, A.

AU - Fahrig, R.

AU - Keall, P.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The exquisite soft tissue contrast, 3D imaging capability, and lack of radiation dose brings magnetic resonance imaging into consideration for guiding external beam radiation therapy of thoracic and abdominal tumors which undergo significant intrafraction motion. For example, in the case of lung cancer, which accounts for 13% of radiation therapy recipients, tumors may move on the order of 20 mm at a rate of 10 mm/s. MRI is ideally suited to continuously monitor the geometry of the tumor for real‐time modification to the treatment protocol. However, there are technical challenges to integrating a radiation therapy system into an MRI system. In this talk, we discuss the considerations for the MRI system in MR‐guided radiotherapy. For the MRI system geometry, several MR systems have been proposed that vary in field strength and system geometry. In the evaluation of these geometries, consideration should include system performance and requirements. Deviation from the conventional cylindrical MRI system affects the field strength, gradient performance, and magnetic field homogeneity. Even with a given magnet geometry, there are tradeoffs in the imaging choices that can be made. Since the signal‐to‐noise ratio is proportional to the field strength, the voxel volume, and the square root of the acquisition time, the voxel volume can be traded off for temporal resolution. Different pulse sequences have different inherent contrasts and signal levels. All of these affect the ability to perform the imaging task, but must be considered within the context of the goal to localize the boundary of the tumor target with sufficient temporal and spatial resolution. Other system considerations might include the use of radiation transparent RF coils. Another consideration is the effect on the MRI of other equipment. High magnetic susceptibility metals such as iron, steel, and many stainless steels experience large forces that would pull them into the MRI system. Lower magnetic susceptibility metals such as aluminum and lead can be safely used within the MRI magnetic field, although care must be taken to minimize eddy currents that may be induced in them, as this may affect imaging performance. Learning Objectives: 1. Understand the tradeoffs in imaging capabilities with different MRI system geometries 2. Understand the tradeoffs in MR imaging of tumors for real‐time therapy guidance.

AB - The exquisite soft tissue contrast, 3D imaging capability, and lack of radiation dose brings magnetic resonance imaging into consideration for guiding external beam radiation therapy of thoracic and abdominal tumors which undergo significant intrafraction motion. For example, in the case of lung cancer, which accounts for 13% of radiation therapy recipients, tumors may move on the order of 20 mm at a rate of 10 mm/s. MRI is ideally suited to continuously monitor the geometry of the tumor for real‐time modification to the treatment protocol. However, there are technical challenges to integrating a radiation therapy system into an MRI system. In this talk, we discuss the considerations for the MRI system in MR‐guided radiotherapy. For the MRI system geometry, several MR systems have been proposed that vary in field strength and system geometry. In the evaluation of these geometries, consideration should include system performance and requirements. Deviation from the conventional cylindrical MRI system affects the field strength, gradient performance, and magnetic field homogeneity. Even with a given magnet geometry, there are tradeoffs in the imaging choices that can be made. Since the signal‐to‐noise ratio is proportional to the field strength, the voxel volume, and the square root of the acquisition time, the voxel volume can be traded off for temporal resolution. Different pulse sequences have different inherent contrasts and signal levels. All of these affect the ability to perform the imaging task, but must be considered within the context of the goal to localize the boundary of the tumor target with sufficient temporal and spatial resolution. Other system considerations might include the use of radiation transparent RF coils. Another consideration is the effect on the MRI of other equipment. High magnetic susceptibility metals such as iron, steel, and many stainless steels experience large forces that would pull them into the MRI system. Lower magnetic susceptibility metals such as aluminum and lead can be safely used within the MRI magnetic field, although care must be taken to minimize eddy currents that may be induced in them, as this may affect imaging performance. Learning Objectives: 1. Understand the tradeoffs in imaging capabilities with different MRI system geometries 2. Understand the tradeoffs in MR imaging of tumors for real‐time therapy guidance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024811279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024811279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3182524

DO - 10.1118/1.3182524

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024811279

VL - 36

SP - 2774

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -