What do 1281 distress screeners tell us about cancer patients in a community cancer center?

Jeff Kendall, Kelly Glaze, Shari Oakland, Jeanice Hansen, Carla Parry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The 2008 Institute of Medicine's Report, Cancer Care for the Whole Patient (IOM, 2008), recommends screening cancer patients for distress. Cancer programs throughout the United States are struggling to achieve this standard. The IOM report indicates that only 14% of 1000 randomly selected American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) members and eight of 15 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) centers reported screening for distress in at least some of their patients [J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 2007;5:99-103]. Without adequate screening, distress often goes unnoticed by cancer professionals and there is little information about the prevalence of distress. The main objective of this article is to present data from 1281 distress screenings completed by patients treated within a community cancer center. Specifically, this article reports the intensity of distress, frequency of problem endorsement, and requests for specific psychosocial providers by cancer patients. Method: Medical and radiation oncology patients completed a distress screener before their first physician appointment. The screening instrument included the Distress Thermometer, a symptom checklist, and a list of psychosocial providers that the patient could request to meet. Results: Thirty-two percent of this sample rated distress above the threshold level. Worry was the most common problem endorsed followed by financial issues. Emotional concerns were endorsed by 59% of the sample. The cancer dietitian was the psychosocial professional most frequently requested by patients. Conclusion: Distress screening can be accomplished within a community cancer center but the provision of psychosocial services is difficult given the high volume of need.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)594-600
Number of pages7
JournalPsycho-Oncology
Volume20
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Neoplasms
Thermometers
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Health and Medicine Division
Radiation Oncology
Medical Oncology
Nutritionists
Checklist
Early Detection of Cancer
Patient Care
Appointments and Schedules
Physicians

Keywords

  • cancer
  • distress
  • distress screening
  • oncology
  • psychosocial oncology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

What do 1281 distress screeners tell us about cancer patients in a community cancer center? / Kendall, Jeff; Glaze, Kelly; Oakland, Shari; Hansen, Jeanice; Parry, Carla.

In: Psycho-Oncology, Vol. 20, No. 6, 06.2011, p. 594-600.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kendall, Jeff ; Glaze, Kelly ; Oakland, Shari ; Hansen, Jeanice ; Parry, Carla. / What do 1281 distress screeners tell us about cancer patients in a community cancer center?. In: Psycho-Oncology. 2011 ; Vol. 20, No. 6. pp. 594-600.
@article{600fb2f73dd9411e8c2cc4c4940e3e47,
title = "What do 1281 distress screeners tell us about cancer patients in a community cancer center?",
abstract = "Objective: The 2008 Institute of Medicine's Report, Cancer Care for the Whole Patient (IOM, 2008), recommends screening cancer patients for distress. Cancer programs throughout the United States are struggling to achieve this standard. The IOM report indicates that only 14{\%} of 1000 randomly selected American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) members and eight of 15 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) centers reported screening for distress in at least some of their patients [J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 2007;5:99-103]. Without adequate screening, distress often goes unnoticed by cancer professionals and there is little information about the prevalence of distress. The main objective of this article is to present data from 1281 distress screenings completed by patients treated within a community cancer center. Specifically, this article reports the intensity of distress, frequency of problem endorsement, and requests for specific psychosocial providers by cancer patients. Method: Medical and radiation oncology patients completed a distress screener before their first physician appointment. The screening instrument included the Distress Thermometer, a symptom checklist, and a list of psychosocial providers that the patient could request to meet. Results: Thirty-two percent of this sample rated distress above the threshold level. Worry was the most common problem endorsed followed by financial issues. Emotional concerns were endorsed by 59{\%} of the sample. The cancer dietitian was the psychosocial professional most frequently requested by patients. Conclusion: Distress screening can be accomplished within a community cancer center but the provision of psychosocial services is difficult given the high volume of need.",
keywords = "cancer, distress, distress screening, oncology, psychosocial oncology",
author = "Jeff Kendall and Kelly Glaze and Shari Oakland and Jeanice Hansen and Carla Parry",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1002/pon.1907",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "594--600",
journal = "Psycho-Oncology",
issn = "1057-9249",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What do 1281 distress screeners tell us about cancer patients in a community cancer center?

AU - Kendall, Jeff

AU - Glaze, Kelly

AU - Oakland, Shari

AU - Hansen, Jeanice

AU - Parry, Carla

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Objective: The 2008 Institute of Medicine's Report, Cancer Care for the Whole Patient (IOM, 2008), recommends screening cancer patients for distress. Cancer programs throughout the United States are struggling to achieve this standard. The IOM report indicates that only 14% of 1000 randomly selected American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) members and eight of 15 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) centers reported screening for distress in at least some of their patients [J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 2007;5:99-103]. Without adequate screening, distress often goes unnoticed by cancer professionals and there is little information about the prevalence of distress. The main objective of this article is to present data from 1281 distress screenings completed by patients treated within a community cancer center. Specifically, this article reports the intensity of distress, frequency of problem endorsement, and requests for specific psychosocial providers by cancer patients. Method: Medical and radiation oncology patients completed a distress screener before their first physician appointment. The screening instrument included the Distress Thermometer, a symptom checklist, and a list of psychosocial providers that the patient could request to meet. Results: Thirty-two percent of this sample rated distress above the threshold level. Worry was the most common problem endorsed followed by financial issues. Emotional concerns were endorsed by 59% of the sample. The cancer dietitian was the psychosocial professional most frequently requested by patients. Conclusion: Distress screening can be accomplished within a community cancer center but the provision of psychosocial services is difficult given the high volume of need.

AB - Objective: The 2008 Institute of Medicine's Report, Cancer Care for the Whole Patient (IOM, 2008), recommends screening cancer patients for distress. Cancer programs throughout the United States are struggling to achieve this standard. The IOM report indicates that only 14% of 1000 randomly selected American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) members and eight of 15 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) centers reported screening for distress in at least some of their patients [J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 2007;5:99-103]. Without adequate screening, distress often goes unnoticed by cancer professionals and there is little information about the prevalence of distress. The main objective of this article is to present data from 1281 distress screenings completed by patients treated within a community cancer center. Specifically, this article reports the intensity of distress, frequency of problem endorsement, and requests for specific psychosocial providers by cancer patients. Method: Medical and radiation oncology patients completed a distress screener before their first physician appointment. The screening instrument included the Distress Thermometer, a symptom checklist, and a list of psychosocial providers that the patient could request to meet. Results: Thirty-two percent of this sample rated distress above the threshold level. Worry was the most common problem endorsed followed by financial issues. Emotional concerns were endorsed by 59% of the sample. The cancer dietitian was the psychosocial professional most frequently requested by patients. Conclusion: Distress screening can be accomplished within a community cancer center but the provision of psychosocial services is difficult given the high volume of need.

KW - cancer

KW - distress

KW - distress screening

KW - oncology

KW - psychosocial oncology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957797248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957797248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pon.1907

DO - 10.1002/pon.1907

M3 - Article

C2 - 21305646

AN - SCOPUS:79957797248

VL - 20

SP - 594

EP - 600

JO - Psycho-Oncology

JF - Psycho-Oncology

SN - 1057-9249

IS - 6

ER -