What do residents need to be competent laparoscopic and endoscopic surgeons?

Aimee K. Gardner, Ross E. Willis, Brian J. Dunkin, Kent R. van Sickle, Kimberly M. Brown, Michael S. Truitt, John M. Uecker, Lonnie Gentry, Daniel J. Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Despite numerous efforts to ensure that surgery residents are adequately trained in the areas of laparoscopy and flexible endoscopy, there remain significant concerns that graduates are not comfortable performing many of these procedures. Methods: Online surveys were sent to surgery residents (98 items, PGY1-5 Categorical) and faculty (78 items, general surgery, and gastrointestinal specialties) at seven institutions. De-identified data were analyzed under an IRB-approved protocol. Results: Ninety-five faculty and 121 residents responded, with response rates of 65 and 52 %, respectively. Seventy-three percent of faculty indicated that competency of their graduating residents were dramatically or slightly worse than previous graduates. Only 29 % of graduating residents felt very comfortable performing advanced laparoscopic (AL) cases and 5 % performing therapeutic endoscopy (TE) cases immediately after graduation. Over half of interns expressed a need for fellowship to feel comfortable performing AL and TE procedures, and this need did not decrease as residents neared graduation. For these procedures, residents receive only “little to some” autonomy, as reported by both faculty and PGY5s. Residents reported that current curricula for laparoscopy and endoscopy consist primarily of clinical experience. Both residents and faculty, though, reported considerable value in other training modalities, including simulations, live animal laboratories, cadavers, and additional didactics. Conclusions: These data indicate that both residents and faculty perceive significant competency gaps for both laparoscopy and flexible endoscopy, with the most notable shortcomings for advanced and therapeutic cases, respectively. Improvement in resident training methods in these areas is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Oct 20 2015

Fingerprint

Endoscopy
Laparoscopy
Research Ethics Committees
Laboratory Animals
Cadaver
Curriculum
Surgeons
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Competency
  • Education
  • Endoscopy
  • Laparoscopy
  • Residents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

What do residents need to be competent laparoscopic and endoscopic surgeons? / Gardner, Aimee K.; Willis, Ross E.; Dunkin, Brian J.; van Sickle, Kent R.; Brown, Kimberly M.; Truitt, Michael S.; Uecker, John M.; Gentry, Lonnie; Scott, Daniel J.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 20.10.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gardner, Aimee K. ; Willis, Ross E. ; Dunkin, Brian J. ; van Sickle, Kent R. ; Brown, Kimberly M. ; Truitt, Michael S. ; Uecker, John M. ; Gentry, Lonnie ; Scott, Daniel J. / What do residents need to be competent laparoscopic and endoscopic surgeons?. In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2015.
@article{67f8f3d2cfc64db380cb92d33c80f8ab,
title = "What do residents need to be competent laparoscopic and endoscopic surgeons?",
abstract = "Background: Despite numerous efforts to ensure that surgery residents are adequately trained in the areas of laparoscopy and flexible endoscopy, there remain significant concerns that graduates are not comfortable performing many of these procedures. Methods: Online surveys were sent to surgery residents (98 items, PGY1-5 Categorical) and faculty (78 items, general surgery, and gastrointestinal specialties) at seven institutions. De-identified data were analyzed under an IRB-approved protocol. Results: Ninety-five faculty and 121 residents responded, with response rates of 65 and 52 {\%}, respectively. Seventy-three percent of faculty indicated that competency of their graduating residents were dramatically or slightly worse than previous graduates. Only 29 {\%} of graduating residents felt very comfortable performing advanced laparoscopic (AL) cases and 5 {\%} performing therapeutic endoscopy (TE) cases immediately after graduation. Over half of interns expressed a need for fellowship to feel comfortable performing AL and TE procedures, and this need did not decrease as residents neared graduation. For these procedures, residents receive only “little to some” autonomy, as reported by both faculty and PGY5s. Residents reported that current curricula for laparoscopy and endoscopy consist primarily of clinical experience. Both residents and faculty, though, reported considerable value in other training modalities, including simulations, live animal laboratories, cadavers, and additional didactics. Conclusions: These data indicate that both residents and faculty perceive significant competency gaps for both laparoscopy and flexible endoscopy, with the most notable shortcomings for advanced and therapeutic cases, respectively. Improvement in resident training methods in these areas is warranted.",
keywords = "Competency, Education, Endoscopy, Laparoscopy, Residents",
author = "Gardner, {Aimee K.} and Willis, {Ross E.} and Dunkin, {Brian J.} and {van Sickle}, {Kent R.} and Brown, {Kimberly M.} and Truitt, {Michael S.} and Uecker, {John M.} and Lonnie Gentry and Scott, {Daniel J.}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-015-4597-8",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What do residents need to be competent laparoscopic and endoscopic surgeons?

AU - Gardner, Aimee K.

AU - Willis, Ross E.

AU - Dunkin, Brian J.

AU - van Sickle, Kent R.

AU - Brown, Kimberly M.

AU - Truitt, Michael S.

AU - Uecker, John M.

AU - Gentry, Lonnie

AU - Scott, Daniel J.

PY - 2015/10/20

Y1 - 2015/10/20

N2 - Background: Despite numerous efforts to ensure that surgery residents are adequately trained in the areas of laparoscopy and flexible endoscopy, there remain significant concerns that graduates are not comfortable performing many of these procedures. Methods: Online surveys were sent to surgery residents (98 items, PGY1-5 Categorical) and faculty (78 items, general surgery, and gastrointestinal specialties) at seven institutions. De-identified data were analyzed under an IRB-approved protocol. Results: Ninety-five faculty and 121 residents responded, with response rates of 65 and 52 %, respectively. Seventy-three percent of faculty indicated that competency of their graduating residents were dramatically or slightly worse than previous graduates. Only 29 % of graduating residents felt very comfortable performing advanced laparoscopic (AL) cases and 5 % performing therapeutic endoscopy (TE) cases immediately after graduation. Over half of interns expressed a need for fellowship to feel comfortable performing AL and TE procedures, and this need did not decrease as residents neared graduation. For these procedures, residents receive only “little to some” autonomy, as reported by both faculty and PGY5s. Residents reported that current curricula for laparoscopy and endoscopy consist primarily of clinical experience. Both residents and faculty, though, reported considerable value in other training modalities, including simulations, live animal laboratories, cadavers, and additional didactics. Conclusions: These data indicate that both residents and faculty perceive significant competency gaps for both laparoscopy and flexible endoscopy, with the most notable shortcomings for advanced and therapeutic cases, respectively. Improvement in resident training methods in these areas is warranted.

AB - Background: Despite numerous efforts to ensure that surgery residents are adequately trained in the areas of laparoscopy and flexible endoscopy, there remain significant concerns that graduates are not comfortable performing many of these procedures. Methods: Online surveys were sent to surgery residents (98 items, PGY1-5 Categorical) and faculty (78 items, general surgery, and gastrointestinal specialties) at seven institutions. De-identified data were analyzed under an IRB-approved protocol. Results: Ninety-five faculty and 121 residents responded, with response rates of 65 and 52 %, respectively. Seventy-three percent of faculty indicated that competency of their graduating residents were dramatically or slightly worse than previous graduates. Only 29 % of graduating residents felt very comfortable performing advanced laparoscopic (AL) cases and 5 % performing therapeutic endoscopy (TE) cases immediately after graduation. Over half of interns expressed a need for fellowship to feel comfortable performing AL and TE procedures, and this need did not decrease as residents neared graduation. For these procedures, residents receive only “little to some” autonomy, as reported by both faculty and PGY5s. Residents reported that current curricula for laparoscopy and endoscopy consist primarily of clinical experience. Both residents and faculty, though, reported considerable value in other training modalities, including simulations, live animal laboratories, cadavers, and additional didactics. Conclusions: These data indicate that both residents and faculty perceive significant competency gaps for both laparoscopy and flexible endoscopy, with the most notable shortcomings for advanced and therapeutic cases, respectively. Improvement in resident training methods in these areas is warranted.

KW - Competency

KW - Education

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Residents

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944930837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944930837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-015-4597-8

DO - 10.1007/s00464-015-4597-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 26487226

AN - SCOPUS:84944930837

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

ER -