What Is the Optimal Management of Late-Presenting Survivors of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection?

Ryan R Davies, Marcus P. Coe, Divakar Mandapati, Amy Gallo, Donald M. Botta, John A. Elefteriades, Michael A. Coady

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although type A aortic dissections represent a surgical emergency, some patients present late after the onset of symptoms. Optimal management of this cohort has not been defined. Methods: Data on 195 patients with type A dissections followed up at a single institution between 1985 and 2005 were collected prospectively. Of these, 93 patients (47.2%) presented 48 hours or later after the initial onset of pain (group A), and the remaining 102 patients underwent immediate operative repair (group B). Median follow-up was 41.8 months (range, 0 to 386 months). Results: Patients in group A were older (68.8 versus 59.3 years, p = 0.0005) and had a higher incidence of coronary artery disease (42.5% versus 14.6%, p < 0.0001), pulmonary disease (26.6% versus 8.4%, p = 0.0023), and congestive heart failure (14.1% versus 1.0%, p = 0.0004). Long-term survival was similar, although group B showed a trend toward improved 30-day mortality (16.5% versus 8.7%, p = 0.1035). Of the 92 patients in group A, 53 (57.6%) eventually underwent operative repair a median of 8.2 days after symptom onset. There was a trend toward improved long-term survival among patients undergoing repair (p = 0.1031). Conclusions: Initial medical management with interval operative repair of selected patients referred greater than 2 days following an acute type A dissection is a viable option. Delayed repair after optimization of the clinical condition and detailed evaluation of concomitant diseases results in excellent long-term results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1593-1602
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of Thoracic Surgery
Volume83
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2007

Fingerprint

Survivors
Dissection
Survival
Lung Diseases
Coronary Artery Disease
Emergencies
Heart Failure
Pain
Mortality
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

What Is the Optimal Management of Late-Presenting Survivors of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection? / Davies, Ryan R; Coe, Marcus P.; Mandapati, Divakar; Gallo, Amy; Botta, Donald M.; Elefteriades, John A.; Coady, Michael A.

In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 83, No. 5, 01.05.2007, p. 1593-1602.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davies, Ryan R ; Coe, Marcus P. ; Mandapati, Divakar ; Gallo, Amy ; Botta, Donald M. ; Elefteriades, John A. ; Coady, Michael A. / What Is the Optimal Management of Late-Presenting Survivors of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection?. In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2007 ; Vol. 83, No. 5. pp. 1593-1602.
@article{e1188bf8ba1c4c73b30fbc3afa522753,
title = "What Is the Optimal Management of Late-Presenting Survivors of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection?",
abstract = "Background: Although type A aortic dissections represent a surgical emergency, some patients present late after the onset of symptoms. Optimal management of this cohort has not been defined. Methods: Data on 195 patients with type A dissections followed up at a single institution between 1985 and 2005 were collected prospectively. Of these, 93 patients (47.2{\%}) presented 48 hours or later after the initial onset of pain (group A), and the remaining 102 patients underwent immediate operative repair (group B). Median follow-up was 41.8 months (range, 0 to 386 months). Results: Patients in group A were older (68.8 versus 59.3 years, p = 0.0005) and had a higher incidence of coronary artery disease (42.5{\%} versus 14.6{\%}, p < 0.0001), pulmonary disease (26.6{\%} versus 8.4{\%}, p = 0.0023), and congestive heart failure (14.1{\%} versus 1.0{\%}, p = 0.0004). Long-term survival was similar, although group B showed a trend toward improved 30-day mortality (16.5{\%} versus 8.7{\%}, p = 0.1035). Of the 92 patients in group A, 53 (57.6{\%}) eventually underwent operative repair a median of 8.2 days after symptom onset. There was a trend toward improved long-term survival among patients undergoing repair (p = 0.1031). Conclusions: Initial medical management with interval operative repair of selected patients referred greater than 2 days following an acute type A dissection is a viable option. Delayed repair after optimization of the clinical condition and detailed evaluation of concomitant diseases results in excellent long-term results.",
author = "Davies, {Ryan R} and Coe, {Marcus P.} and Divakar Mandapati and Amy Gallo and Botta, {Donald M.} and Elefteriades, {John A.} and Coady, {Michael A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.12.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "1593--1602",
journal = "Annals of Thoracic Surgery",
issn = "0003-4975",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Is the Optimal Management of Late-Presenting Survivors of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection?

AU - Davies, Ryan R

AU - Coe, Marcus P.

AU - Mandapati, Divakar

AU - Gallo, Amy

AU - Botta, Donald M.

AU - Elefteriades, John A.

AU - Coady, Michael A.

PY - 2007/5/1

Y1 - 2007/5/1

N2 - Background: Although type A aortic dissections represent a surgical emergency, some patients present late after the onset of symptoms. Optimal management of this cohort has not been defined. Methods: Data on 195 patients with type A dissections followed up at a single institution between 1985 and 2005 were collected prospectively. Of these, 93 patients (47.2%) presented 48 hours or later after the initial onset of pain (group A), and the remaining 102 patients underwent immediate operative repair (group B). Median follow-up was 41.8 months (range, 0 to 386 months). Results: Patients in group A were older (68.8 versus 59.3 years, p = 0.0005) and had a higher incidence of coronary artery disease (42.5% versus 14.6%, p < 0.0001), pulmonary disease (26.6% versus 8.4%, p = 0.0023), and congestive heart failure (14.1% versus 1.0%, p = 0.0004). Long-term survival was similar, although group B showed a trend toward improved 30-day mortality (16.5% versus 8.7%, p = 0.1035). Of the 92 patients in group A, 53 (57.6%) eventually underwent operative repair a median of 8.2 days after symptom onset. There was a trend toward improved long-term survival among patients undergoing repair (p = 0.1031). Conclusions: Initial medical management with interval operative repair of selected patients referred greater than 2 days following an acute type A dissection is a viable option. Delayed repair after optimization of the clinical condition and detailed evaluation of concomitant diseases results in excellent long-term results.

AB - Background: Although type A aortic dissections represent a surgical emergency, some patients present late after the onset of symptoms. Optimal management of this cohort has not been defined. Methods: Data on 195 patients with type A dissections followed up at a single institution between 1985 and 2005 were collected prospectively. Of these, 93 patients (47.2%) presented 48 hours or later after the initial onset of pain (group A), and the remaining 102 patients underwent immediate operative repair (group B). Median follow-up was 41.8 months (range, 0 to 386 months). Results: Patients in group A were older (68.8 versus 59.3 years, p = 0.0005) and had a higher incidence of coronary artery disease (42.5% versus 14.6%, p < 0.0001), pulmonary disease (26.6% versus 8.4%, p = 0.0023), and congestive heart failure (14.1% versus 1.0%, p = 0.0004). Long-term survival was similar, although group B showed a trend toward improved 30-day mortality (16.5% versus 8.7%, p = 0.1035). Of the 92 patients in group A, 53 (57.6%) eventually underwent operative repair a median of 8.2 days after symptom onset. There was a trend toward improved long-term survival among patients undergoing repair (p = 0.1031). Conclusions: Initial medical management with interval operative repair of selected patients referred greater than 2 days following an acute type A dissection is a viable option. Delayed repair after optimization of the clinical condition and detailed evaluation of concomitant diseases results in excellent long-term results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247224233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247224233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.12.018

DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.12.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 17462364

AN - SCOPUS:34247224233

VL - 83

SP - 1593

EP - 1602

JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

SN - 0003-4975

IS - 5

ER -