Why adolescents fight: A qualitative study of youth perspectives on fighting and its prevention

Rashmi Shetgiri, Simon C. Lee, John Tillitski, Connie Wilson, Glenn Flores

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for fighting, factors that protect against fighting, and strategies to prevent fighting, among adolescents who fight and those uninvolved in fighting. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with middle and high school students, stratified by fighting (fighter/nonfighter) status, race/ethnicity, and gender. Groups were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using margin coding and thematic content analysis. Themes were independently identified by 3 coders; disagreements were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: The 65 participants in the 12 focus groups were 13 to 17 years old. Reasons for fighting include self-defense, to gain/maintain respect, or anger; having goals for the future is protective. Nonfighters state that their parents condone fighting only when physically attacked and that they teach adolescents strategies to avoid fighting. Fighters describe mixed messages from parents, and pro-fighting attitudes and modeling of aggressive behavior among some family members. Nonfighters avoid fighting by ignoring insults or walking away. Fighters feel unable to use nonviolent conflict-resolution methods effectively. Peers may instigate or encourage fights. Suggested prevention strategies include anger-management and conflict-resolution programs, relationships with caring adults, and physicians counseling youth about the consequences of fighting. CONCLUSIONS: Nonfighters use various strategies to avoid fighting, whereas fighters are aware of few alternatives to fighting. Conflicting parental messages about fighting may enhance the likelihood of fighting. Physicians can counsel youth about the negative consequences of fighting. Interventions that teach anger management and conflict resolution, promote adolescent self-efficacy for using nonviolent strategies, and address parental attitudes about fighting may be effective in preventing fighting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-110
Number of pages8
JournalAcademic Pediatrics
Volume15
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Negotiating
Focus Groups
Parents
Physicians
Anger
Self Efficacy
Walking
Counseling
Consensus
Students
Anger Management Therapy

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Aggression
  • Anger
  • Parents
  • Peer group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Why adolescents fight : A qualitative study of youth perspectives on fighting and its prevention. / Shetgiri, Rashmi; Lee, Simon C.; Tillitski, John; Wilson, Connie; Flores, Glenn.

In: Academic Pediatrics, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2015, p. 103-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shetgiri, R, Lee, SC, Tillitski, J, Wilson, C & Flores, G 2015, 'Why adolescents fight: A qualitative study of youth perspectives on fighting and its prevention', Academic Pediatrics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 103-110.
Shetgiri, Rashmi ; Lee, Simon C. ; Tillitski, John ; Wilson, Connie ; Flores, Glenn. / Why adolescents fight : A qualitative study of youth perspectives on fighting and its prevention. In: Academic Pediatrics. 2015 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 103-110.
@article{94a59846f8124414bde0ff78d7474e3b,
title = "Why adolescents fight: A qualitative study of youth perspectives on fighting and its prevention",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for fighting, factors that protect against fighting, and strategies to prevent fighting, among adolescents who fight and those uninvolved in fighting. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with middle and high school students, stratified by fighting (fighter/nonfighter) status, race/ethnicity, and gender. Groups were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using margin coding and thematic content analysis. Themes were independently identified by 3 coders; disagreements were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: The 65 participants in the 12 focus groups were 13 to 17 years old. Reasons for fighting include self-defense, to gain/maintain respect, or anger; having goals for the future is protective. Nonfighters state that their parents condone fighting only when physically attacked and that they teach adolescents strategies to avoid fighting. Fighters describe mixed messages from parents, and pro-fighting attitudes and modeling of aggressive behavior among some family members. Nonfighters avoid fighting by ignoring insults or walking away. Fighters feel unable to use nonviolent conflict-resolution methods effectively. Peers may instigate or encourage fights. Suggested prevention strategies include anger-management and conflict-resolution programs, relationships with caring adults, and physicians counseling youth about the consequences of fighting. CONCLUSIONS: Nonfighters use various strategies to avoid fighting, whereas fighters are aware of few alternatives to fighting. Conflicting parental messages about fighting may enhance the likelihood of fighting. Physicians can counsel youth about the negative consequences of fighting. Interventions that teach anger management and conflict resolution, promote adolescent self-efficacy for using nonviolent strategies, and address parental attitudes about fighting may be effective in preventing fighting.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Aggression, Anger, Parents, Peer group",
author = "Rashmi Shetgiri and Lee, {Simon C.} and John Tillitski and Connie Wilson and Glenn Flores",
year = "2015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "103--110",
journal = "Academic Pediatrics",
issn = "1876-2859",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why adolescents fight

T2 - A qualitative study of youth perspectives on fighting and its prevention

AU - Shetgiri, Rashmi

AU - Lee, Simon C.

AU - Tillitski, John

AU - Wilson, Connie

AU - Flores, Glenn

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for fighting, factors that protect against fighting, and strategies to prevent fighting, among adolescents who fight and those uninvolved in fighting. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with middle and high school students, stratified by fighting (fighter/nonfighter) status, race/ethnicity, and gender. Groups were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using margin coding and thematic content analysis. Themes were independently identified by 3 coders; disagreements were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: The 65 participants in the 12 focus groups were 13 to 17 years old. Reasons for fighting include self-defense, to gain/maintain respect, or anger; having goals for the future is protective. Nonfighters state that their parents condone fighting only when physically attacked and that they teach adolescents strategies to avoid fighting. Fighters describe mixed messages from parents, and pro-fighting attitudes and modeling of aggressive behavior among some family members. Nonfighters avoid fighting by ignoring insults or walking away. Fighters feel unable to use nonviolent conflict-resolution methods effectively. Peers may instigate or encourage fights. Suggested prevention strategies include anger-management and conflict-resolution programs, relationships with caring adults, and physicians counseling youth about the consequences of fighting. CONCLUSIONS: Nonfighters use various strategies to avoid fighting, whereas fighters are aware of few alternatives to fighting. Conflicting parental messages about fighting may enhance the likelihood of fighting. Physicians can counsel youth about the negative consequences of fighting. Interventions that teach anger management and conflict resolution, promote adolescent self-efficacy for using nonviolent strategies, and address parental attitudes about fighting may be effective in preventing fighting.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for fighting, factors that protect against fighting, and strategies to prevent fighting, among adolescents who fight and those uninvolved in fighting. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with middle and high school students, stratified by fighting (fighter/nonfighter) status, race/ethnicity, and gender. Groups were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using margin coding and thematic content analysis. Themes were independently identified by 3 coders; disagreements were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: The 65 participants in the 12 focus groups were 13 to 17 years old. Reasons for fighting include self-defense, to gain/maintain respect, or anger; having goals for the future is protective. Nonfighters state that their parents condone fighting only when physically attacked and that they teach adolescents strategies to avoid fighting. Fighters describe mixed messages from parents, and pro-fighting attitudes and modeling of aggressive behavior among some family members. Nonfighters avoid fighting by ignoring insults or walking away. Fighters feel unable to use nonviolent conflict-resolution methods effectively. Peers may instigate or encourage fights. Suggested prevention strategies include anger-management and conflict-resolution programs, relationships with caring adults, and physicians counseling youth about the consequences of fighting. CONCLUSIONS: Nonfighters use various strategies to avoid fighting, whereas fighters are aware of few alternatives to fighting. Conflicting parental messages about fighting may enhance the likelihood of fighting. Physicians can counsel youth about the negative consequences of fighting. Interventions that teach anger management and conflict resolution, promote adolescent self-efficacy for using nonviolent strategies, and address parental attitudes about fighting may be effective in preventing fighting.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Aggression

KW - Anger

KW - Parents

KW - Peer group

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927606187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927606187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 25528128

AN - SCOPUS:84927606187

VL - 15

SP - 103

EP - 110

JO - Academic Pediatrics

JF - Academic Pediatrics

SN - 1876-2859

IS - 1

ER -