Wound-healing outcomes using standardized assessment and care in clinical practice.

Laura Bolton, Patrick McNees, Lia van Rijswijk, Jean de Leon, Courtney Lyder, Laura Kobza, Kelly Edman, Anne Scheurich, Ron Shannon, Michelle Toth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Wound-healing outcomes applying standardized protocols have typically been measured within controlled clinical trials, not natural settings. Standardized protocols of wound care have been validated for clinical use, creating an opportunity to measure the resulting outcomes. PURPOSE: Wound-healing outcomes were explored during clinical use of standardized validated protocols of care based on patient and wound assessments. DESIGN: This was a prospective multicenter study of wound-healing outcomes management in real-world clinical practice. METHOD: Healing outcomes from March 26 to October 31, 2001, were recorded on patients in 3 long-term care facilities, 1 long-term acute care hospital, and 12 home care agencies for wounds selected by staff to receive care based on computer-generated validated wound care algorithms. After diagnosis, wound dimensions and status were assessed using a tool adapted from the Pressure Sore Status Toolfor use on all wounds. Wound, ostomy, and continence nursing professionals accessed consistent protocols of care, via telemedicine in home care or paper forms in long-term care. A physician entered assessments into a desktop computer in the wound clinic. Based on evidence that healing proceeds faster with fewer infections in environments without gauze, the protocols generally avoided gauze dressings. RESULTS: Most of the 767 wounds selected to receive the standardized-protocols of care were stage III-IV pressure ulcers (n = 373; mean healing time 62 days) or full-thickness venous ulcers (n = 124; mean healing time 57 days). Partial-thickness wounds healed faster than same-etiology full-thickness wounds. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide benchmarks for natural-setting healing outcomes and help to define and address wound care challenges. Outcomes primarily using nongauze protocols of care matched or surpassed best previously published results on similar wounds using gauze-based protocols of care, including protocols applying gauze impregnated with growth factors or other agents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-71
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society / WOCN
Volume31
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2004

Fingerprint

Wound Healing
Wounds and Injuries
Long-Term Care
Pressure Ulcer
Ostomy
Home Care Agencies
Benchmarking
Varicose Ulcer
Telemedicine
Controlled Clinical Trials
Bandages
Home Care Services
Multicenter Studies
Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
Nursing
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Prospective Studies
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Wound-healing outcomes using standardized assessment and care in clinical practice. / Bolton, Laura; McNees, Patrick; van Rijswijk, Lia; de Leon, Jean; Lyder, Courtney; Kobza, Laura; Edman, Kelly; Scheurich, Anne; Shannon, Ron; Toth, Michelle.

In: Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society / WOCN, Vol. 31, No. 2, 03.2004, p. 65-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bolton, Laura ; McNees, Patrick ; van Rijswijk, Lia ; de Leon, Jean ; Lyder, Courtney ; Kobza, Laura ; Edman, Kelly ; Scheurich, Anne ; Shannon, Ron ; Toth, Michelle. / Wound-healing outcomes using standardized assessment and care in clinical practice. In: Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society / WOCN. 2004 ; Vol. 31, No. 2. pp. 65-71.
@article{55d1397b598648ef97b4cdb66a1d86b1,
title = "Wound-healing outcomes using standardized assessment and care in clinical practice.",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Wound-healing outcomes applying standardized protocols have typically been measured within controlled clinical trials, not natural settings. Standardized protocols of wound care have been validated for clinical use, creating an opportunity to measure the resulting outcomes. PURPOSE: Wound-healing outcomes were explored during clinical use of standardized validated protocols of care based on patient and wound assessments. DESIGN: This was a prospective multicenter study of wound-healing outcomes management in real-world clinical practice. METHOD: Healing outcomes from March 26 to October 31, 2001, were recorded on patients in 3 long-term care facilities, 1 long-term acute care hospital, and 12 home care agencies for wounds selected by staff to receive care based on computer-generated validated wound care algorithms. After diagnosis, wound dimensions and status were assessed using a tool adapted from the Pressure Sore Status Toolfor use on all wounds. Wound, ostomy, and continence nursing professionals accessed consistent protocols of care, via telemedicine in home care or paper forms in long-term care. A physician entered assessments into a desktop computer in the wound clinic. Based on evidence that healing proceeds faster with fewer infections in environments without gauze, the protocols generally avoided gauze dressings. RESULTS: Most of the 767 wounds selected to receive the standardized-protocols of care were stage III-IV pressure ulcers (n = 373; mean healing time 62 days) or full-thickness venous ulcers (n = 124; mean healing time 57 days). Partial-thickness wounds healed faster than same-etiology full-thickness wounds. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide benchmarks for natural-setting healing outcomes and help to define and address wound care challenges. Outcomes primarily using nongauze protocols of care matched or surpassed best previously published results on similar wounds using gauze-based protocols of care, including protocols applying gauze impregnated with growth factors or other agents.",
author = "Laura Bolton and Patrick McNees and {van Rijswijk}, Lia and {de Leon}, Jean and Courtney Lyder and Laura Kobza and Kelly Edman and Anne Scheurich and Ron Shannon and Michelle Toth",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "65--71",
journal = "Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing",
issn = "1071-5754",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wound-healing outcomes using standardized assessment and care in clinical practice.

AU - Bolton, Laura

AU - McNees, Patrick

AU - van Rijswijk, Lia

AU - de Leon, Jean

AU - Lyder, Courtney

AU - Kobza, Laura

AU - Edman, Kelly

AU - Scheurich, Anne

AU - Shannon, Ron

AU - Toth, Michelle

PY - 2004/3

Y1 - 2004/3

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Wound-healing outcomes applying standardized protocols have typically been measured within controlled clinical trials, not natural settings. Standardized protocols of wound care have been validated for clinical use, creating an opportunity to measure the resulting outcomes. PURPOSE: Wound-healing outcomes were explored during clinical use of standardized validated protocols of care based on patient and wound assessments. DESIGN: This was a prospective multicenter study of wound-healing outcomes management in real-world clinical practice. METHOD: Healing outcomes from March 26 to October 31, 2001, were recorded on patients in 3 long-term care facilities, 1 long-term acute care hospital, and 12 home care agencies for wounds selected by staff to receive care based on computer-generated validated wound care algorithms. After diagnosis, wound dimensions and status were assessed using a tool adapted from the Pressure Sore Status Toolfor use on all wounds. Wound, ostomy, and continence nursing professionals accessed consistent protocols of care, via telemedicine in home care or paper forms in long-term care. A physician entered assessments into a desktop computer in the wound clinic. Based on evidence that healing proceeds faster with fewer infections in environments without gauze, the protocols generally avoided gauze dressings. RESULTS: Most of the 767 wounds selected to receive the standardized-protocols of care were stage III-IV pressure ulcers (n = 373; mean healing time 62 days) or full-thickness venous ulcers (n = 124; mean healing time 57 days). Partial-thickness wounds healed faster than same-etiology full-thickness wounds. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide benchmarks for natural-setting healing outcomes and help to define and address wound care challenges. Outcomes primarily using nongauze protocols of care matched or surpassed best previously published results on similar wounds using gauze-based protocols of care, including protocols applying gauze impregnated with growth factors or other agents.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Wound-healing outcomes applying standardized protocols have typically been measured within controlled clinical trials, not natural settings. Standardized protocols of wound care have been validated for clinical use, creating an opportunity to measure the resulting outcomes. PURPOSE: Wound-healing outcomes were explored during clinical use of standardized validated protocols of care based on patient and wound assessments. DESIGN: This was a prospective multicenter study of wound-healing outcomes management in real-world clinical practice. METHOD: Healing outcomes from March 26 to October 31, 2001, were recorded on patients in 3 long-term care facilities, 1 long-term acute care hospital, and 12 home care agencies for wounds selected by staff to receive care based on computer-generated validated wound care algorithms. After diagnosis, wound dimensions and status were assessed using a tool adapted from the Pressure Sore Status Toolfor use on all wounds. Wound, ostomy, and continence nursing professionals accessed consistent protocols of care, via telemedicine in home care or paper forms in long-term care. A physician entered assessments into a desktop computer in the wound clinic. Based on evidence that healing proceeds faster with fewer infections in environments without gauze, the protocols generally avoided gauze dressings. RESULTS: Most of the 767 wounds selected to receive the standardized-protocols of care were stage III-IV pressure ulcers (n = 373; mean healing time 62 days) or full-thickness venous ulcers (n = 124; mean healing time 57 days). Partial-thickness wounds healed faster than same-etiology full-thickness wounds. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide benchmarks for natural-setting healing outcomes and help to define and address wound care challenges. Outcomes primarily using nongauze protocols of care matched or surpassed best previously published results on similar wounds using gauze-based protocols of care, including protocols applying gauze impregnated with growth factors or other agents.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3042725350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3042725350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15209428

AN - SCOPUS:3042725350

VL - 31

SP - 65

EP - 71

JO - Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing

JF - Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing

SN - 1071-5754

IS - 2

ER -