Yes, I did it, but don't blame me

Perceptions of excuse defenses

Wendy P. Heath, Jeff Stone, John M. Darley, Bruce D. Grannemann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

According to some, it is increasingly common for defendants to admit they committed an offense but to argue that they shouldn't be held legally responsible because they have an excuse. The present study was conducted to investigate views of excuse defenses. Forty-three participants rated 15 different excuse defenses (e.g., steroid use) on a number of characteristics (e.g., persuasiveness of defense). Participants also indicated whether they would be willing to change an assigned sentence (increase or decrease sentence, recommend treatment or probation) in the presence of each excuse defense. Ratings revealed that excuses vary in persuasiveness, with the persuasiveness of an excuse associated with the defendant's perceived amount of responsibility for the act and control over the criminal act and excusing condition. Defendants providing excuses seen as more persuasive tended to receive shorter sentences and more treatment recommendations. Possible factors influencing judgments are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)187-226
Number of pages40
JournalJournal of Psychiatry and Law
Volume31
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 2003

Fingerprint

Steroids
probation
rating
offense
responsibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Heath, W. P., Stone, J., Darley, J. M., & Grannemann, B. D. (2003). Yes, I did it, but don't blame me: Perceptions of excuse defenses. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 31(2), 187-226.

Yes, I did it, but don't blame me : Perceptions of excuse defenses. / Heath, Wendy P.; Stone, Jeff; Darley, John M.; Grannemann, Bruce D.

In: Journal of Psychiatry and Law, Vol. 31, No. 2, 06.2003, p. 187-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Heath, WP, Stone, J, Darley, JM & Grannemann, BD 2003, 'Yes, I did it, but don't blame me: Perceptions of excuse defenses', Journal of Psychiatry and Law, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 187-226.
Heath WP, Stone J, Darley JM, Grannemann BD. Yes, I did it, but don't blame me: Perceptions of excuse defenses. Journal of Psychiatry and Law. 2003 Jun;31(2):187-226.
Heath, Wendy P. ; Stone, Jeff ; Darley, John M. ; Grannemann, Bruce D. / Yes, I did it, but don't blame me : Perceptions of excuse defenses. In: Journal of Psychiatry and Law. 2003 ; Vol. 31, No. 2. pp. 187-226.
@article{ab1c2185465447648d5919a1bfeaf641,
title = "Yes, I did it, but don't blame me: Perceptions of excuse defenses",
abstract = "According to some, it is increasingly common for defendants to admit they committed an offense but to argue that they shouldn't be held legally responsible because they have an excuse. The present study was conducted to investigate views of excuse defenses. Forty-three participants rated 15 different excuse defenses (e.g., steroid use) on a number of characteristics (e.g., persuasiveness of defense). Participants also indicated whether they would be willing to change an assigned sentence (increase or decrease sentence, recommend treatment or probation) in the presence of each excuse defense. Ratings revealed that excuses vary in persuasiveness, with the persuasiveness of an excuse associated with the defendant's perceived amount of responsibility for the act and control over the criminal act and excusing condition. Defendants providing excuses seen as more persuasive tended to receive shorter sentences and more treatment recommendations. Possible factors influencing judgments are discussed.",
author = "Heath, {Wendy P.} and Jeff Stone and Darley, {John M.} and Grannemann, {Bruce D.}",
year = "2003",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "187--226",
journal = "Journal of Psychiatry and Law",
issn = "0093-1853",
publisher = "Federal Legal Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Yes, I did it, but don't blame me

T2 - Perceptions of excuse defenses

AU - Heath, Wendy P.

AU - Stone, Jeff

AU - Darley, John M.

AU - Grannemann, Bruce D.

PY - 2003/6

Y1 - 2003/6

N2 - According to some, it is increasingly common for defendants to admit they committed an offense but to argue that they shouldn't be held legally responsible because they have an excuse. The present study was conducted to investigate views of excuse defenses. Forty-three participants rated 15 different excuse defenses (e.g., steroid use) on a number of characteristics (e.g., persuasiveness of defense). Participants also indicated whether they would be willing to change an assigned sentence (increase or decrease sentence, recommend treatment or probation) in the presence of each excuse defense. Ratings revealed that excuses vary in persuasiveness, with the persuasiveness of an excuse associated with the defendant's perceived amount of responsibility for the act and control over the criminal act and excusing condition. Defendants providing excuses seen as more persuasive tended to receive shorter sentences and more treatment recommendations. Possible factors influencing judgments are discussed.

AB - According to some, it is increasingly common for defendants to admit they committed an offense but to argue that they shouldn't be held legally responsible because they have an excuse. The present study was conducted to investigate views of excuse defenses. Forty-three participants rated 15 different excuse defenses (e.g., steroid use) on a number of characteristics (e.g., persuasiveness of defense). Participants also indicated whether they would be willing to change an assigned sentence (increase or decrease sentence, recommend treatment or probation) in the presence of each excuse defense. Ratings revealed that excuses vary in persuasiveness, with the persuasiveness of an excuse associated with the defendant's perceived amount of responsibility for the act and control over the criminal act and excusing condition. Defendants providing excuses seen as more persuasive tended to receive shorter sentences and more treatment recommendations. Possible factors influencing judgments are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242354016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242354016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 187

EP - 226

JO - Journal of Psychiatry and Law

JF - Journal of Psychiatry and Law

SN - 0093-1853

IS - 2

ER -