Zoom imaging for rapid aortic vessel wall imaging and cardiovascular risk assessment

Tarique Hussain, Rachel E. Clough, Marina Cecelja, Marcus Makowski, Sarah Peel, Philip Chowienczyk, Tobias Schaeffter, Gerald Greil, Rene Botnar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To demonstrate the utility of a "reduced field-of-view" (zoom imaging) technique to accelerate free-breathing, ECG-triggered, turbo-spin-echo black-blood sequences, which have been previously described to detect subclinical aortic atherosclerosis. Materials and Methods: Fifteen healthy volunteers underwent MRI of the thoracic and abdominal aorta. Imaging with the conventional full field-of-view sequence was compared with zoom imaging. Total scan time, image quality (i.e., contrast-to-noise ratio and vessel wall sharpness) and vessel wall thickness were analyzed. A subgroup of 10 volunteers also underwent acceleration of imaging using sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for comparison. Results: Zoom imaging significantly reduced imaging time from a mean of 41 ± 9 min (conventional imaging) to 15 ± 0.5 min (P < 0.01). There was no difference in image quality between conventional and zoom imaging with respect to CNR (10.1 ± 6 versus 10.1 ± 6) or vessel wall sharpness (38 ± 4% versus 39 ± 4%). Furthermore, Bland Altman plots showed excellent agreement in vessel wall thickness measurements using the two methods. In comparison, SENSE not only reduced CNR but also resulted in underestimation of vessel wall thickness compared with the conventional sequence. Conclusion: Zoom imaging allows accurate and time-efficient imaging of the abdominal and thoracic aorta for cardiovascular risk prediction. In this application, it is preferable to SENSE.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)279-285
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2011

Fingerprint

Abdominal Aorta
Thoracic Aorta
Noise
Volunteers
Atherosclerosis
Healthy Volunteers
Electrocardiography
Respiration

Keywords

  • aorta
  • atherosclerosis
  • cardiovascular system
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • risk factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Hussain, T., Clough, R. E., Cecelja, M., Makowski, M., Peel, S., Chowienczyk, P., ... Botnar, R. (2011). Zoom imaging for rapid aortic vessel wall imaging and cardiovascular risk assessment. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 34(2), 279-285. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22617

Zoom imaging for rapid aortic vessel wall imaging and cardiovascular risk assessment. / Hussain, Tarique; Clough, Rachel E.; Cecelja, Marina; Makowski, Marcus; Peel, Sarah; Chowienczyk, Philip; Schaeffter, Tobias; Greil, Gerald; Botnar, Rene.

In: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 34, No. 2, 01.08.2011, p. 279-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hussain, T, Clough, RE, Cecelja, M, Makowski, M, Peel, S, Chowienczyk, P, Schaeffter, T, Greil, G & Botnar, R 2011, 'Zoom imaging for rapid aortic vessel wall imaging and cardiovascular risk assessment', Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 279-285. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22617
Hussain, Tarique ; Clough, Rachel E. ; Cecelja, Marina ; Makowski, Marcus ; Peel, Sarah ; Chowienczyk, Philip ; Schaeffter, Tobias ; Greil, Gerald ; Botnar, Rene. / Zoom imaging for rapid aortic vessel wall imaging and cardiovascular risk assessment. In: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2011 ; Vol. 34, No. 2. pp. 279-285.
@article{b96c6d615d9641d69569abdad29087ff,
title = "Zoom imaging for rapid aortic vessel wall imaging and cardiovascular risk assessment",
abstract = "Purpose: To demonstrate the utility of a {"}reduced field-of-view{"} (zoom imaging) technique to accelerate free-breathing, ECG-triggered, turbo-spin-echo black-blood sequences, which have been previously described to detect subclinical aortic atherosclerosis. Materials and Methods: Fifteen healthy volunteers underwent MRI of the thoracic and abdominal aorta. Imaging with the conventional full field-of-view sequence was compared with zoom imaging. Total scan time, image quality (i.e., contrast-to-noise ratio and vessel wall sharpness) and vessel wall thickness were analyzed. A subgroup of 10 volunteers also underwent acceleration of imaging using sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for comparison. Results: Zoom imaging significantly reduced imaging time from a mean of 41 ± 9 min (conventional imaging) to 15 ± 0.5 min (P < 0.01). There was no difference in image quality between conventional and zoom imaging with respect to CNR (10.1 ± 6 versus 10.1 ± 6) or vessel wall sharpness (38 ± 4{\%} versus 39 ± 4{\%}). Furthermore, Bland Altman plots showed excellent agreement in vessel wall thickness measurements using the two methods. In comparison, SENSE not only reduced CNR but also resulted in underestimation of vessel wall thickness compared with the conventional sequence. Conclusion: Zoom imaging allows accurate and time-efficient imaging of the abdominal and thoracic aorta for cardiovascular risk prediction. In this application, it is preferable to SENSE.",
keywords = "aorta, atherosclerosis, cardiovascular system, magnetic resonance imaging, risk factors",
author = "Tarique Hussain and Clough, {Rachel E.} and Marina Cecelja and Marcus Makowski and Sarah Peel and Philip Chowienczyk and Tobias Schaeffter and Gerald Greil and Rene Botnar",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jmri.22617",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "279--285",
journal = "Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging",
issn = "1053-1807",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Zoom imaging for rapid aortic vessel wall imaging and cardiovascular risk assessment

AU - Hussain, Tarique

AU - Clough, Rachel E.

AU - Cecelja, Marina

AU - Makowski, Marcus

AU - Peel, Sarah

AU - Chowienczyk, Philip

AU - Schaeffter, Tobias

AU - Greil, Gerald

AU - Botnar, Rene

PY - 2011/8/1

Y1 - 2011/8/1

N2 - Purpose: To demonstrate the utility of a "reduced field-of-view" (zoom imaging) technique to accelerate free-breathing, ECG-triggered, turbo-spin-echo black-blood sequences, which have been previously described to detect subclinical aortic atherosclerosis. Materials and Methods: Fifteen healthy volunteers underwent MRI of the thoracic and abdominal aorta. Imaging with the conventional full field-of-view sequence was compared with zoom imaging. Total scan time, image quality (i.e., contrast-to-noise ratio and vessel wall sharpness) and vessel wall thickness were analyzed. A subgroup of 10 volunteers also underwent acceleration of imaging using sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for comparison. Results: Zoom imaging significantly reduced imaging time from a mean of 41 ± 9 min (conventional imaging) to 15 ± 0.5 min (P < 0.01). There was no difference in image quality between conventional and zoom imaging with respect to CNR (10.1 ± 6 versus 10.1 ± 6) or vessel wall sharpness (38 ± 4% versus 39 ± 4%). Furthermore, Bland Altman plots showed excellent agreement in vessel wall thickness measurements using the two methods. In comparison, SENSE not only reduced CNR but also resulted in underestimation of vessel wall thickness compared with the conventional sequence. Conclusion: Zoom imaging allows accurate and time-efficient imaging of the abdominal and thoracic aorta for cardiovascular risk prediction. In this application, it is preferable to SENSE.

AB - Purpose: To demonstrate the utility of a "reduced field-of-view" (zoom imaging) technique to accelerate free-breathing, ECG-triggered, turbo-spin-echo black-blood sequences, which have been previously described to detect subclinical aortic atherosclerosis. Materials and Methods: Fifteen healthy volunteers underwent MRI of the thoracic and abdominal aorta. Imaging with the conventional full field-of-view sequence was compared with zoom imaging. Total scan time, image quality (i.e., contrast-to-noise ratio and vessel wall sharpness) and vessel wall thickness were analyzed. A subgroup of 10 volunteers also underwent acceleration of imaging using sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for comparison. Results: Zoom imaging significantly reduced imaging time from a mean of 41 ± 9 min (conventional imaging) to 15 ± 0.5 min (P < 0.01). There was no difference in image quality between conventional and zoom imaging with respect to CNR (10.1 ± 6 versus 10.1 ± 6) or vessel wall sharpness (38 ± 4% versus 39 ± 4%). Furthermore, Bland Altman plots showed excellent agreement in vessel wall thickness measurements using the two methods. In comparison, SENSE not only reduced CNR but also resulted in underestimation of vessel wall thickness compared with the conventional sequence. Conclusion: Zoom imaging allows accurate and time-efficient imaging of the abdominal and thoracic aorta for cardiovascular risk prediction. In this application, it is preferable to SENSE.

KW - aorta

KW - atherosclerosis

KW - cardiovascular system

KW - magnetic resonance imaging

KW - risk factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960612652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960612652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jmri.22617

DO - 10.1002/jmri.22617

M3 - Article

C2 - 21780223

AN - SCOPUS:79960612652

VL - 34

SP - 279

EP - 285

JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

SN - 1053-1807

IS - 2

ER -