A biomechanical comparison of various methods of stabilization of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur

A. F. Tencer, K. D. Johnson, D. W C Johnston, K. Gill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

135 Scopus citations

Abstract

Subtrochanteric femoral fractures with and without bony contact were simulated in cadaver specimens, fixed with one of seven different types of intramedullary or plate implants, and tested biomechanically. The implants used were Enders pins, Zickel nail, compression hip screw, AO angled blade plate, and intramedullary locked nail systems of the Klemm‐Schellman, Brooker‐Wills, and Grosse‐Kempf types. Femur‐implant constructs using intramedullary devices were a maximum of 5% as stiff in torsion as intact cadaveric femora tested in the same manner, while plate‐fixed fractures were nearly 50% as stiff. In bending, all devices except the Enders pins were ∼80% as stiff as intact femora. Loss of bony contact at the fracture site had little effect on stiffness except in the case of the keyless compression hip screw, where the screw rotated freely in the barrel. In combined bending and compression to failure, a test to simulate forces due to body weight, the intramedullary locked rods were found to support between 300 and 400% of body weight while the plate systems failed at loads between 100 and 200% of body weight.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)297-305
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Research
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984

Keywords

  • Implant rigidity comparison
  • Subtrochanteric femoral fracture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A biomechanical comparison of various methods of stabilization of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this