A comparison of instrument sensitivity to negative symptom change

Stacey L. Eckert, Pamela M. Diamond, Alexander L. Miller, Dawn I. Velligan, Linda G. Funderburg, Janet E. True

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Accurate assessment of negative symptom changes in schizophrenic patients is crucial to determining the efficacy of new treatments. The present study examined the sensitivity to change over the course of hospitalization in negative symptomatology assessed by the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), the Negative Symptom Assessment (NSA), and an expanded version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) in a sample of 60 schizophrenic patients. Symptoms were assessed when the patients were acutely ill and again when they were stabilized. Effect sizes were compared across all three rating scales. The retardation factor of the BPRS had a relatively small effect size (0.32). Effect size for the total NSA was 0.78 and ranged from 0.38 to 0.87 for the SANS. Individual factors had moderate to large effect sizes that ranged from 0.18 to 0.91 for both scales. Separate analyses were performed to calculate effect sizes for a five-factor version of the NSA and to examine only those symptoms specified in DSM-IV (alogia, affective flattening, and avolition). Effect sizes relatively comparable to those found for the entire SANS and NSA scales were found for the separate calculations. Results indicate that the addition of a negative symptom assessment instrument to research protocols increases the ability to detect changes in negative symptoms with substantially fewer subjects than would be required with the BPRS retardation factor alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-75
Number of pages9
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume63
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 26 1996

Fingerprint

Symptom Assessment
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale
Aptitude
Aphasia
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Hospitalization

Keywords

  • Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale
  • Negative Symptom Assessment
  • Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms
  • Schizophrenia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Eckert, S. L., Diamond, P. M., Miller, A. L., Velligan, D. I., Funderburg, L. G., & True, J. E. (1996). A comparison of instrument sensitivity to negative symptom change. Psychiatry Research, 63(1), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(96)02870-3

A comparison of instrument sensitivity to negative symptom change. / Eckert, Stacey L.; Diamond, Pamela M.; Miller, Alexander L.; Velligan, Dawn I.; Funderburg, Linda G.; True, Janet E.

In: Psychiatry Research, Vol. 63, No. 1, 26.06.1996, p. 67-75.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eckert, SL, Diamond, PM, Miller, AL, Velligan, DI, Funderburg, LG & True, JE 1996, 'A comparison of instrument sensitivity to negative symptom change', Psychiatry Research, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(96)02870-3
Eckert SL, Diamond PM, Miller AL, Velligan DI, Funderburg LG, True JE. A comparison of instrument sensitivity to negative symptom change. Psychiatry Research. 1996 Jun 26;63(1):67-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(96)02870-3
Eckert, Stacey L. ; Diamond, Pamela M. ; Miller, Alexander L. ; Velligan, Dawn I. ; Funderburg, Linda G. ; True, Janet E. / A comparison of instrument sensitivity to negative symptom change. In: Psychiatry Research. 1996 ; Vol. 63, No. 1. pp. 67-75.
@article{7fd551011aa84ffda45b7a91cb4d149a,
title = "A comparison of instrument sensitivity to negative symptom change",
abstract = "Accurate assessment of negative symptom changes in schizophrenic patients is crucial to determining the efficacy of new treatments. The present study examined the sensitivity to change over the course of hospitalization in negative symptomatology assessed by the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), the Negative Symptom Assessment (NSA), and an expanded version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) in a sample of 60 schizophrenic patients. Symptoms were assessed when the patients were acutely ill and again when they were stabilized. Effect sizes were compared across all three rating scales. The retardation factor of the BPRS had a relatively small effect size (0.32). Effect size for the total NSA was 0.78 and ranged from 0.38 to 0.87 for the SANS. Individual factors had moderate to large effect sizes that ranged from 0.18 to 0.91 for both scales. Separate analyses were performed to calculate effect sizes for a five-factor version of the NSA and to examine only those symptoms specified in DSM-IV (alogia, affective flattening, and avolition). Effect sizes relatively comparable to those found for the entire SANS and NSA scales were found for the separate calculations. Results indicate that the addition of a negative symptom assessment instrument to research protocols increases the ability to detect changes in negative symptoms with substantially fewer subjects than would be required with the BPRS retardation factor alone.",
keywords = "Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Negative Symptom Assessment, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, Schizophrenia",
author = "Eckert, {Stacey L.} and Diamond, {Pamela M.} and Miller, {Alexander L.} and Velligan, {Dawn I.} and Funderburg, {Linda G.} and True, {Janet E.}",
year = "1996",
month = "6",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1016/0165-1781(96)02870-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "67--75",
journal = "Psychiatry Research",
issn = "0165-1781",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of instrument sensitivity to negative symptom change

AU - Eckert, Stacey L.

AU - Diamond, Pamela M.

AU - Miller, Alexander L.

AU - Velligan, Dawn I.

AU - Funderburg, Linda G.

AU - True, Janet E.

PY - 1996/6/26

Y1 - 1996/6/26

N2 - Accurate assessment of negative symptom changes in schizophrenic patients is crucial to determining the efficacy of new treatments. The present study examined the sensitivity to change over the course of hospitalization in negative symptomatology assessed by the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), the Negative Symptom Assessment (NSA), and an expanded version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) in a sample of 60 schizophrenic patients. Symptoms were assessed when the patients were acutely ill and again when they were stabilized. Effect sizes were compared across all three rating scales. The retardation factor of the BPRS had a relatively small effect size (0.32). Effect size for the total NSA was 0.78 and ranged from 0.38 to 0.87 for the SANS. Individual factors had moderate to large effect sizes that ranged from 0.18 to 0.91 for both scales. Separate analyses were performed to calculate effect sizes for a five-factor version of the NSA and to examine only those symptoms specified in DSM-IV (alogia, affective flattening, and avolition). Effect sizes relatively comparable to those found for the entire SANS and NSA scales were found for the separate calculations. Results indicate that the addition of a negative symptom assessment instrument to research protocols increases the ability to detect changes in negative symptoms with substantially fewer subjects than would be required with the BPRS retardation factor alone.

AB - Accurate assessment of negative symptom changes in schizophrenic patients is crucial to determining the efficacy of new treatments. The present study examined the sensitivity to change over the course of hospitalization in negative symptomatology assessed by the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), the Negative Symptom Assessment (NSA), and an expanded version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) in a sample of 60 schizophrenic patients. Symptoms were assessed when the patients were acutely ill and again when they were stabilized. Effect sizes were compared across all three rating scales. The retardation factor of the BPRS had a relatively small effect size (0.32). Effect size for the total NSA was 0.78 and ranged from 0.38 to 0.87 for the SANS. Individual factors had moderate to large effect sizes that ranged from 0.18 to 0.91 for both scales. Separate analyses were performed to calculate effect sizes for a five-factor version of the NSA and to examine only those symptoms specified in DSM-IV (alogia, affective flattening, and avolition). Effect sizes relatively comparable to those found for the entire SANS and NSA scales were found for the separate calculations. Results indicate that the addition of a negative symptom assessment instrument to research protocols increases the ability to detect changes in negative symptoms with substantially fewer subjects than would be required with the BPRS retardation factor alone.

KW - Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale

KW - Negative Symptom Assessment

KW - Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms

KW - Schizophrenia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030602644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030602644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0165-1781(96)02870-3

DO - 10.1016/0165-1781(96)02870-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 8832775

AN - SCOPUS:0030602644

VL - 63

SP - 67

EP - 75

JO - Psychiatry Research

JF - Psychiatry Research

SN - 0165-1781

IS - 1

ER -