A comparison of physiologic modulators of fMRI signals

Peiying Liu, Andrew C. Hebrank, Karen M. Rodrigue, Kristen M. Kennedy, Denise C. Park, Hanzhang Lu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One of the main obstacles in quantitative interpretation of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal is that this signal is influenced by non-neural factors such as vascular properties of the brain, which effectively increases signal variability. One approach to account for non-neural components is to identify and measure these confounding factors and to include them as covariates in data analysis or interpretation. Previously, several research groups have independently identified four potential physiologic modulators of fMRI signals, including baseline venous oxygenation (Yv), cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), resting state BOLD fluctuation amplitude (RSFA), and baseline cerebral blood flow (CBF). This study sought to directly compare the modulation effects of these indices in the same fMRI session. The physiologic parameters were measured with techniques comparable with those used in the previous studies except for CBF, which was determined globally with a velocity-based phase-contrast MRI (instead of arterial-spin-labeling MRI). Using an event-related, scene-categorization fMRI task, we showed that the fMRI signal amplitude was positively correlated with CVR (P < 0.0001) and RSFA (P = 0.002), while negatively correlated with baseline Yv (P < 0.0001). The fMRI-CBF correlation did not reach significance, although the (negative) sign of the correlation was consistent with the earlier study. Furthermore, among the physiologic modulators themselves, significant correlations were observed between baseline Yv and baseline CBF (P = 0.01), and between CVR and RSFA (P = 0.05), suggesting that some of the modulators may partly be of similar physiologic origins. These observations as well as findings in recent literature suggest that additional measurement of physiologic modulator(s) in an fMRI session may provide a practical approach to control for inter-subject variations and to improve the ability of fMRI in detecting disease or medication related differences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2078-2088
Number of pages11
JournalHuman Brain Mapping
Volume34
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Cerebrovascular Circulation
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Blood Vessels
Brain
Research

Keywords

  • BOLD fMRI
  • Cerebral blood flow
  • Cerebrovascular reactivity
  • Normalization
  • Resting state BOLD fluctuation
  • Venous oxygenation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anatomy
  • Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Liu, P., Hebrank, A. C., Rodrigue, K. M., Kennedy, K. M., Park, D. C., & Lu, H. (2013). A comparison of physiologic modulators of fMRI signals. Human Brain Mapping, 34(9), 2078-2088. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22053

A comparison of physiologic modulators of fMRI signals. / Liu, Peiying; Hebrank, Andrew C.; Rodrigue, Karen M.; Kennedy, Kristen M.; Park, Denise C.; Lu, Hanzhang.

In: Human Brain Mapping, Vol. 34, No. 9, 09.2013, p. 2078-2088.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Liu, P, Hebrank, AC, Rodrigue, KM, Kennedy, KM, Park, DC & Lu, H 2013, 'A comparison of physiologic modulators of fMRI signals', Human Brain Mapping, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 2078-2088. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22053
Liu P, Hebrank AC, Rodrigue KM, Kennedy KM, Park DC, Lu H. A comparison of physiologic modulators of fMRI signals. Human Brain Mapping. 2013 Sep;34(9):2078-2088. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22053
Liu, Peiying ; Hebrank, Andrew C. ; Rodrigue, Karen M. ; Kennedy, Kristen M. ; Park, Denise C. ; Lu, Hanzhang. / A comparison of physiologic modulators of fMRI signals. In: Human Brain Mapping. 2013 ; Vol. 34, No. 9. pp. 2078-2088.
@article{1d0ec1909a854f10b1894270612e677e,
title = "A comparison of physiologic modulators of fMRI signals",
abstract = "One of the main obstacles in quantitative interpretation of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal is that this signal is influenced by non-neural factors such as vascular properties of the brain, which effectively increases signal variability. One approach to account for non-neural components is to identify and measure these confounding factors and to include them as covariates in data analysis or interpretation. Previously, several research groups have independently identified four potential physiologic modulators of fMRI signals, including baseline venous oxygenation (Yv), cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), resting state BOLD fluctuation amplitude (RSFA), and baseline cerebral blood flow (CBF). This study sought to directly compare the modulation effects of these indices in the same fMRI session. The physiologic parameters were measured with techniques comparable with those used in the previous studies except for CBF, which was determined globally with a velocity-based phase-contrast MRI (instead of arterial-spin-labeling MRI). Using an event-related, scene-categorization fMRI task, we showed that the fMRI signal amplitude was positively correlated with CVR (P < 0.0001) and RSFA (P = 0.002), while negatively correlated with baseline Yv (P < 0.0001). The fMRI-CBF correlation did not reach significance, although the (negative) sign of the correlation was consistent with the earlier study. Furthermore, among the physiologic modulators themselves, significant correlations were observed between baseline Yv and baseline CBF (P = 0.01), and between CVR and RSFA (P = 0.05), suggesting that some of the modulators may partly be of similar physiologic origins. These observations as well as findings in recent literature suggest that additional measurement of physiologic modulator(s) in an fMRI session may provide a practical approach to control for inter-subject variations and to improve the ability of fMRI in detecting disease or medication related differences.",
keywords = "BOLD fMRI, Cerebral blood flow, Cerebrovascular reactivity, Normalization, Resting state BOLD fluctuation, Venous oxygenation",
author = "Peiying Liu and Hebrank, {Andrew C.} and Rodrigue, {Karen M.} and Kennedy, {Kristen M.} and Park, {Denise C.} and Hanzhang Lu",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1002/hbm.22053",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "2078--2088",
journal = "Human Brain Mapping",
issn = "1065-9471",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of physiologic modulators of fMRI signals

AU - Liu, Peiying

AU - Hebrank, Andrew C.

AU - Rodrigue, Karen M.

AU - Kennedy, Kristen M.

AU - Park, Denise C.

AU - Lu, Hanzhang

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - One of the main obstacles in quantitative interpretation of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal is that this signal is influenced by non-neural factors such as vascular properties of the brain, which effectively increases signal variability. One approach to account for non-neural components is to identify and measure these confounding factors and to include them as covariates in data analysis or interpretation. Previously, several research groups have independently identified four potential physiologic modulators of fMRI signals, including baseline venous oxygenation (Yv), cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), resting state BOLD fluctuation amplitude (RSFA), and baseline cerebral blood flow (CBF). This study sought to directly compare the modulation effects of these indices in the same fMRI session. The physiologic parameters were measured with techniques comparable with those used in the previous studies except for CBF, which was determined globally with a velocity-based phase-contrast MRI (instead of arterial-spin-labeling MRI). Using an event-related, scene-categorization fMRI task, we showed that the fMRI signal amplitude was positively correlated with CVR (P < 0.0001) and RSFA (P = 0.002), while negatively correlated with baseline Yv (P < 0.0001). The fMRI-CBF correlation did not reach significance, although the (negative) sign of the correlation was consistent with the earlier study. Furthermore, among the physiologic modulators themselves, significant correlations were observed between baseline Yv and baseline CBF (P = 0.01), and between CVR and RSFA (P = 0.05), suggesting that some of the modulators may partly be of similar physiologic origins. These observations as well as findings in recent literature suggest that additional measurement of physiologic modulator(s) in an fMRI session may provide a practical approach to control for inter-subject variations and to improve the ability of fMRI in detecting disease or medication related differences.

AB - One of the main obstacles in quantitative interpretation of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal is that this signal is influenced by non-neural factors such as vascular properties of the brain, which effectively increases signal variability. One approach to account for non-neural components is to identify and measure these confounding factors and to include them as covariates in data analysis or interpretation. Previously, several research groups have independently identified four potential physiologic modulators of fMRI signals, including baseline venous oxygenation (Yv), cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), resting state BOLD fluctuation amplitude (RSFA), and baseline cerebral blood flow (CBF). This study sought to directly compare the modulation effects of these indices in the same fMRI session. The physiologic parameters were measured with techniques comparable with those used in the previous studies except for CBF, which was determined globally with a velocity-based phase-contrast MRI (instead of arterial-spin-labeling MRI). Using an event-related, scene-categorization fMRI task, we showed that the fMRI signal amplitude was positively correlated with CVR (P < 0.0001) and RSFA (P = 0.002), while negatively correlated with baseline Yv (P < 0.0001). The fMRI-CBF correlation did not reach significance, although the (negative) sign of the correlation was consistent with the earlier study. Furthermore, among the physiologic modulators themselves, significant correlations were observed between baseline Yv and baseline CBF (P = 0.01), and between CVR and RSFA (P = 0.05), suggesting that some of the modulators may partly be of similar physiologic origins. These observations as well as findings in recent literature suggest that additional measurement of physiologic modulator(s) in an fMRI session may provide a practical approach to control for inter-subject variations and to improve the ability of fMRI in detecting disease or medication related differences.

KW - BOLD fMRI

KW - Cerebral blood flow

KW - Cerebrovascular reactivity

KW - Normalization

KW - Resting state BOLD fluctuation

KW - Venous oxygenation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882701943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882701943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hbm.22053

DO - 10.1002/hbm.22053

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 2078

EP - 2088

JO - Human Brain Mapping

JF - Human Brain Mapping

SN - 1065-9471

IS - 9

ER -