A critical overview of the evidence base for the contemporary surgical management of stress incontinence

Yvonne Katherine P Koch, Philippe Zimmern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this article is to evaluate the evidence base for surgical management of stress urinary incontinence in women between July 2006 and December 2007. RECENT FINDINGS: The Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network and Pelvic Floor Diseases Network have contributed level 1 evidence in the management of stress urinary incontinence with multicentric randomized controlled trials. Pubovaginal sling has a higher success rate than the Burch at the expense of a higher morbidity. A prophylactic Burch procedure at the time of an abdominal sacrocolpopexy can reduce secondary stress urinary incontinence and urge urinary incontinence. Suburethral tapes have a higher cure rate for patients with predominant stress urinary incontinence and can safely be placed at the time of concomitant pelvic surgery. The tension-free vaginal tape has a higher rate of lower urinary tract injury and voiding dysfunction when compared with transobturator tape. SUMMARY: The Burch and pubovaginal sling have a high success rate for treating stress urinary incontinence. Prospective randomized trials are needed to assess the long-term results of suburethral slings. There is still no consensus on outcome measures when reporting on surgical management for stress urinary incontinence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)370-376
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Opinion in Urology
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2008

Fingerprint

Stress Urinary Incontinence
Suburethral Slings
Pelvic Floor Disorders
Urge Urinary Incontinence
Urinary Incontinence
Urinary Tract
Randomized Controlled Trials
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Morbidity
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Burch
  • Incontinence and prolapse
  • Sling
  • Stress incontinence
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

A critical overview of the evidence base for the contemporary surgical management of stress incontinence. / Koch, Yvonne Katherine P; Zimmern, Philippe.

In: Current Opinion in Urology, Vol. 18, No. 4, 07.2008, p. 370-376.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{51b2535c7dce4e0e85f6d9915eec6af2,
title = "A critical overview of the evidence base for the contemporary surgical management of stress incontinence",
abstract = "PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this article is to evaluate the evidence base for surgical management of stress urinary incontinence in women between July 2006 and December 2007. RECENT FINDINGS: The Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network and Pelvic Floor Diseases Network have contributed level 1 evidence in the management of stress urinary incontinence with multicentric randomized controlled trials. Pubovaginal sling has a higher success rate than the Burch at the expense of a higher morbidity. A prophylactic Burch procedure at the time of an abdominal sacrocolpopexy can reduce secondary stress urinary incontinence and urge urinary incontinence. Suburethral tapes have a higher cure rate for patients with predominant stress urinary incontinence and can safely be placed at the time of concomitant pelvic surgery. The tension-free vaginal tape has a higher rate of lower urinary tract injury and voiding dysfunction when compared with transobturator tape. SUMMARY: The Burch and pubovaginal sling have a high success rate for treating stress urinary incontinence. Prospective randomized trials are needed to assess the long-term results of suburethral slings. There is still no consensus on outcome measures when reporting on surgical management for stress urinary incontinence.",
keywords = "Burch, Incontinence and prolapse, Sling, Stress incontinence, Surgery",
author = "Koch, {Yvonne Katherine P} and Philippe Zimmern",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282fdf8d5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "370--376",
journal = "Current Opinion in Urology",
issn = "0963-0643",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A critical overview of the evidence base for the contemporary surgical management of stress incontinence

AU - Koch, Yvonne Katherine P

AU - Zimmern, Philippe

PY - 2008/7

Y1 - 2008/7

N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this article is to evaluate the evidence base for surgical management of stress urinary incontinence in women between July 2006 and December 2007. RECENT FINDINGS: The Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network and Pelvic Floor Diseases Network have contributed level 1 evidence in the management of stress urinary incontinence with multicentric randomized controlled trials. Pubovaginal sling has a higher success rate than the Burch at the expense of a higher morbidity. A prophylactic Burch procedure at the time of an abdominal sacrocolpopexy can reduce secondary stress urinary incontinence and urge urinary incontinence. Suburethral tapes have a higher cure rate for patients with predominant stress urinary incontinence and can safely be placed at the time of concomitant pelvic surgery. The tension-free vaginal tape has a higher rate of lower urinary tract injury and voiding dysfunction when compared with transobturator tape. SUMMARY: The Burch and pubovaginal sling have a high success rate for treating stress urinary incontinence. Prospective randomized trials are needed to assess the long-term results of suburethral slings. There is still no consensus on outcome measures when reporting on surgical management for stress urinary incontinence.

AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this article is to evaluate the evidence base for surgical management of stress urinary incontinence in women between July 2006 and December 2007. RECENT FINDINGS: The Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network and Pelvic Floor Diseases Network have contributed level 1 evidence in the management of stress urinary incontinence with multicentric randomized controlled trials. Pubovaginal sling has a higher success rate than the Burch at the expense of a higher morbidity. A prophylactic Burch procedure at the time of an abdominal sacrocolpopexy can reduce secondary stress urinary incontinence and urge urinary incontinence. Suburethral tapes have a higher cure rate for patients with predominant stress urinary incontinence and can safely be placed at the time of concomitant pelvic surgery. The tension-free vaginal tape has a higher rate of lower urinary tract injury and voiding dysfunction when compared with transobturator tape. SUMMARY: The Burch and pubovaginal sling have a high success rate for treating stress urinary incontinence. Prospective randomized trials are needed to assess the long-term results of suburethral slings. There is still no consensus on outcome measures when reporting on surgical management for stress urinary incontinence.

KW - Burch

KW - Incontinence and prolapse

KW - Sling

KW - Stress incontinence

KW - Surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44649127429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44649127429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282fdf8d5

DO - 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282fdf8d5

M3 - Article

C2 - 18520757

AN - SCOPUS:44649127429

VL - 18

SP - 370

EP - 376

JO - Current Opinion in Urology

JF - Current Opinion in Urology

SN - 0963-0643

IS - 4

ER -