A multicenter, simulation-based skills training collaborative using shared GI mentor II systems: Results from the Texas association of surgical skills laboratories (TASSL) flexible endoscopy curriculum

Kent R. Van Sickle, Lauren Buck, Ross Willis, Alicia Mangram, Michael S. Truitt, Mohsen Shabahang, Scott Thomas, Lee Trombetta, Brian Dunkin, Daniel Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The Texas Association of Surgical Skills Laboratories (TASSL) is a nonprofit consortium of surgical skills training centers for the accredited surgery residency programs in Texas. A training and research collaborative was forged between TASSL members and Simbionix (Cleveland, OH, USA) to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a multicenter, simulation-and Web-based flexible endoscopy training curriculum using shared GI Mentor II systems. Methods Two GI Mentor II flexible endoscopy simulators were provided for the study, and four institutions, namely, the University of Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio (UTHSCSA), Texas A &M University (TAMU), Methodist Hospital (MHD), and Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC), agreed to share them. One additional site, University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW), already owned a device and participated during the study period. Postgraduate years (PGYs) 1 to 4 subjects completed pre-and posttraining questionnaires and one pre-and posttraining trial of Colonoscopy Case Module 1. EndoBubble 1 and 2 tasks with predefined, expert-derived levels were used for training. Pre-and posttesting performance data were recorded on the simulator and by the Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES). All study materials were available through the TASSL Web site. Preand posttest comparisons were made by paired t-test. Results The curriculum was completed successfully by 41 participants from four institutions. The mean number of trials to proficiency was 13 ± 10 for EndoBubble 1 and 23 ± 16 for EndoBubble 2. Significant improvements from pre-to posttraining were seen in cecal intubation time (229 ± 97 vs. 150 ± 57 s; p<0.001), total time (454 ± 147 vs. 320 ± 115 s; p<0.001), screening efficiency (85% ± 12% vs. 91% ± 5%; p<0.002), GAGES scores (15 vs. 19; p<0.001), subjects' endoscopy self-rating scores (1.5 ± 1.0 vs. 2.7 ± 0.6; range, 0-4; p<0.001), and comfort level with flexible endoscopy skills (3.4 ± 3.0 vs. 7.2 ± 1.2; range, 0-8; p<0.001). Conclusions The feasibility of sharing educational and training resources among institutions was demonstrated. Likewise, the concept of "mobile simulation" appears to be useful and effective, with three of the four institutions involved successfully in implementing the training curriculum during a fixed period. Additionally, subjects who completed the training demonstrated both subjective and objective improvements in flexible endoscopy skills.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2980-2986
Number of pages7
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume25
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2011

Fingerprint

Mentors
Curriculum
Endoscopy
Military Hospitals
Colonoscopy
Internship and Residency
Intubation
Equipment and Supplies
Health
Research

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Curriculum
  • Flexible endoscopy
  • Simulation
  • Training
  • Virtual reality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

A multicenter, simulation-based skills training collaborative using shared GI mentor II systems : Results from the Texas association of surgical skills laboratories (TASSL) flexible endoscopy curriculum. / Van Sickle, Kent R.; Buck, Lauren; Willis, Ross; Mangram, Alicia; Truitt, Michael S.; Shabahang, Mohsen; Thomas, Scott; Trombetta, Lee; Dunkin, Brian; Scott, Daniel.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 25, No. 9, 09.2011, p. 2980-2986.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Van Sickle, Kent R. ; Buck, Lauren ; Willis, Ross ; Mangram, Alicia ; Truitt, Michael S. ; Shabahang, Mohsen ; Thomas, Scott ; Trombetta, Lee ; Dunkin, Brian ; Scott, Daniel. / A multicenter, simulation-based skills training collaborative using shared GI mentor II systems : Results from the Texas association of surgical skills laboratories (TASSL) flexible endoscopy curriculum. In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2011 ; Vol. 25, No. 9. pp. 2980-2986.
@article{1636096066d0458b8a56d1b7e8bd4c02,
title = "A multicenter, simulation-based skills training collaborative using shared GI mentor II systems: Results from the Texas association of surgical skills laboratories (TASSL) flexible endoscopy curriculum",
abstract = "Background The Texas Association of Surgical Skills Laboratories (TASSL) is a nonprofit consortium of surgical skills training centers for the accredited surgery residency programs in Texas. A training and research collaborative was forged between TASSL members and Simbionix (Cleveland, OH, USA) to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a multicenter, simulation-and Web-based flexible endoscopy training curriculum using shared GI Mentor II systems. Methods Two GI Mentor II flexible endoscopy simulators were provided for the study, and four institutions, namely, the University of Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio (UTHSCSA), Texas A &M University (TAMU), Methodist Hospital (MHD), and Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC), agreed to share them. One additional site, University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW), already owned a device and participated during the study period. Postgraduate years (PGYs) 1 to 4 subjects completed pre-and posttraining questionnaires and one pre-and posttraining trial of Colonoscopy Case Module 1. EndoBubble 1 and 2 tasks with predefined, expert-derived levels were used for training. Pre-and posttesting performance data were recorded on the simulator and by the Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES). All study materials were available through the TASSL Web site. Preand posttest comparisons were made by paired t-test. Results The curriculum was completed successfully by 41 participants from four institutions. The mean number of trials to proficiency was 13 ± 10 for EndoBubble 1 and 23 ± 16 for EndoBubble 2. Significant improvements from pre-to posttraining were seen in cecal intubation time (229 ± 97 vs. 150 ± 57 s; p<0.001), total time (454 ± 147 vs. 320 ± 115 s; p<0.001), screening efficiency (85{\%} ± 12{\%} vs. 91{\%} ± 5{\%}; p<0.002), GAGES scores (15 vs. 19; p<0.001), subjects' endoscopy self-rating scores (1.5 ± 1.0 vs. 2.7 ± 0.6; range, 0-4; p<0.001), and comfort level with flexible endoscopy skills (3.4 ± 3.0 vs. 7.2 ± 1.2; range, 0-8; p<0.001). Conclusions The feasibility of sharing educational and training resources among institutions was demonstrated. Likewise, the concept of {"}mobile simulation{"} appears to be useful and effective, with three of the four institutions involved successfully in implementing the training curriculum during a fixed period. Additionally, subjects who completed the training demonstrated both subjective and objective improvements in flexible endoscopy skills.",
keywords = "Assessment, Curriculum, Flexible endoscopy, Simulation, Training, Virtual reality",
author = "{Van Sickle}, {Kent R.} and Lauren Buck and Ross Willis and Alicia Mangram and Truitt, {Michael S.} and Mohsen Shabahang and Scott Thomas and Lee Trombetta and Brian Dunkin and Daniel Scott",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-011-1656-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "2980--2986",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multicenter, simulation-based skills training collaborative using shared GI mentor II systems

T2 - Results from the Texas association of surgical skills laboratories (TASSL) flexible endoscopy curriculum

AU - Van Sickle, Kent R.

AU - Buck, Lauren

AU - Willis, Ross

AU - Mangram, Alicia

AU - Truitt, Michael S.

AU - Shabahang, Mohsen

AU - Thomas, Scott

AU - Trombetta, Lee

AU - Dunkin, Brian

AU - Scott, Daniel

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - Background The Texas Association of Surgical Skills Laboratories (TASSL) is a nonprofit consortium of surgical skills training centers for the accredited surgery residency programs in Texas. A training and research collaborative was forged between TASSL members and Simbionix (Cleveland, OH, USA) to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a multicenter, simulation-and Web-based flexible endoscopy training curriculum using shared GI Mentor II systems. Methods Two GI Mentor II flexible endoscopy simulators were provided for the study, and four institutions, namely, the University of Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio (UTHSCSA), Texas A &M University (TAMU), Methodist Hospital (MHD), and Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC), agreed to share them. One additional site, University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW), already owned a device and participated during the study period. Postgraduate years (PGYs) 1 to 4 subjects completed pre-and posttraining questionnaires and one pre-and posttraining trial of Colonoscopy Case Module 1. EndoBubble 1 and 2 tasks with predefined, expert-derived levels were used for training. Pre-and posttesting performance data were recorded on the simulator and by the Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES). All study materials were available through the TASSL Web site. Preand posttest comparisons were made by paired t-test. Results The curriculum was completed successfully by 41 participants from four institutions. The mean number of trials to proficiency was 13 ± 10 for EndoBubble 1 and 23 ± 16 for EndoBubble 2. Significant improvements from pre-to posttraining were seen in cecal intubation time (229 ± 97 vs. 150 ± 57 s; p<0.001), total time (454 ± 147 vs. 320 ± 115 s; p<0.001), screening efficiency (85% ± 12% vs. 91% ± 5%; p<0.002), GAGES scores (15 vs. 19; p<0.001), subjects' endoscopy self-rating scores (1.5 ± 1.0 vs. 2.7 ± 0.6; range, 0-4; p<0.001), and comfort level with flexible endoscopy skills (3.4 ± 3.0 vs. 7.2 ± 1.2; range, 0-8; p<0.001). Conclusions The feasibility of sharing educational and training resources among institutions was demonstrated. Likewise, the concept of "mobile simulation" appears to be useful and effective, with three of the four institutions involved successfully in implementing the training curriculum during a fixed period. Additionally, subjects who completed the training demonstrated both subjective and objective improvements in flexible endoscopy skills.

AB - Background The Texas Association of Surgical Skills Laboratories (TASSL) is a nonprofit consortium of surgical skills training centers for the accredited surgery residency programs in Texas. A training and research collaborative was forged between TASSL members and Simbionix (Cleveland, OH, USA) to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a multicenter, simulation-and Web-based flexible endoscopy training curriculum using shared GI Mentor II systems. Methods Two GI Mentor II flexible endoscopy simulators were provided for the study, and four institutions, namely, the University of Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio (UTHSCSA), Texas A &M University (TAMU), Methodist Hospital (MHD), and Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC), agreed to share them. One additional site, University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW), already owned a device and participated during the study period. Postgraduate years (PGYs) 1 to 4 subjects completed pre-and posttraining questionnaires and one pre-and posttraining trial of Colonoscopy Case Module 1. EndoBubble 1 and 2 tasks with predefined, expert-derived levels were used for training. Pre-and posttesting performance data were recorded on the simulator and by the Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES). All study materials were available through the TASSL Web site. Preand posttest comparisons were made by paired t-test. Results The curriculum was completed successfully by 41 participants from four institutions. The mean number of trials to proficiency was 13 ± 10 for EndoBubble 1 and 23 ± 16 for EndoBubble 2. Significant improvements from pre-to posttraining were seen in cecal intubation time (229 ± 97 vs. 150 ± 57 s; p<0.001), total time (454 ± 147 vs. 320 ± 115 s; p<0.001), screening efficiency (85% ± 12% vs. 91% ± 5%; p<0.002), GAGES scores (15 vs. 19; p<0.001), subjects' endoscopy self-rating scores (1.5 ± 1.0 vs. 2.7 ± 0.6; range, 0-4; p<0.001), and comfort level with flexible endoscopy skills (3.4 ± 3.0 vs. 7.2 ± 1.2; range, 0-8; p<0.001). Conclusions The feasibility of sharing educational and training resources among institutions was demonstrated. Likewise, the concept of "mobile simulation" appears to be useful and effective, with three of the four institutions involved successfully in implementing the training curriculum during a fixed period. Additionally, subjects who completed the training demonstrated both subjective and objective improvements in flexible endoscopy skills.

KW - Assessment

KW - Curriculum

KW - Flexible endoscopy

KW - Simulation

KW - Training

KW - Virtual reality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80055081503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80055081503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-011-1656-7

DO - 10.1007/s00464-011-1656-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 21487880

AN - SCOPUS:80055081503

VL - 25

SP - 2980

EP - 2986

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 9

ER -