Accuracy of self-reported smoking and secondhand smoke exposure in the US workforce: The national health and nutrition examination surveys

Kristopher L. Arheart, David J. Lee, Lora E. Fleming, William G. LeBlanc, Noella A. Dietz, Kathryn E. McCollister, James D. Wilkinson, John E. Lewis, John D. Clark, Evelyn P. Davila, Frank C. Bandiera, Michael J. Erard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Occupational health studies often rely on self-reported secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. This study examines the accuracy of self-reported tobacco use and SHS exposure. METHODS: Data on serum cotinine, self-reported tobacco use, and SHS exposure for US workers were extracted from three National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (n = 17,011). Serum cotinine levels were used to classify workers into SHS exposure categories. The percent agreement between self-reported tobacco use and SHS exposure with the cotinine categories was calculated. RESULTS: Workers reporting tobacco use were 88% accurate whereas workers reporting work, home, or home+work exposures were 87% to 92% accurate. Workers reporting no SHS exposure were only 28% accurate. CONCLUSIONS: Workers accurately reported their smoking status and workplace-home SHS exposures, but substantial numbers reporting "no exposures" had detectable levels of cotinine in their blood, indicating exposure to SHS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1414-1420
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Volume50
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2008

Fingerprint

Tobacco Smoke Pollution
Nutrition Surveys
Smoking
Cotinine
Tobacco Use
Occupational Health
Serum
Workplace

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Accuracy of self-reported smoking and secondhand smoke exposure in the US workforce : The national health and nutrition examination surveys. / Arheart, Kristopher L.; Lee, David J.; Fleming, Lora E.; LeBlanc, William G.; Dietz, Noella A.; McCollister, Kathryn E.; Wilkinson, James D.; Lewis, John E.; Clark, John D.; Davila, Evelyn P.; Bandiera, Frank C.; Erard, Michael J.

In: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 50, No. 12, 01.12.2008, p. 1414-1420.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Arheart, KL, Lee, DJ, Fleming, LE, LeBlanc, WG, Dietz, NA, McCollister, KE, Wilkinson, JD, Lewis, JE, Clark, JD, Davila, EP, Bandiera, FC & Erard, MJ 2008, 'Accuracy of self-reported smoking and secondhand smoke exposure in the US workforce: The national health and nutrition examination surveys', Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 1414-1420. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318188b90a
Arheart, Kristopher L. ; Lee, David J. ; Fleming, Lora E. ; LeBlanc, William G. ; Dietz, Noella A. ; McCollister, Kathryn E. ; Wilkinson, James D. ; Lewis, John E. ; Clark, John D. ; Davila, Evelyn P. ; Bandiera, Frank C. ; Erard, Michael J. / Accuracy of self-reported smoking and secondhand smoke exposure in the US workforce : The national health and nutrition examination surveys. In: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 50, No. 12. pp. 1414-1420.
@article{ffac68f254664e22855f29038ac0a62a,
title = "Accuracy of self-reported smoking and secondhand smoke exposure in the US workforce: The national health and nutrition examination surveys",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Occupational health studies often rely on self-reported secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. This study examines the accuracy of self-reported tobacco use and SHS exposure. METHODS: Data on serum cotinine, self-reported tobacco use, and SHS exposure for US workers were extracted from three National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (n = 17,011). Serum cotinine levels were used to classify workers into SHS exposure categories. The percent agreement between self-reported tobacco use and SHS exposure with the cotinine categories was calculated. RESULTS: Workers reporting tobacco use were 88{\%} accurate whereas workers reporting work, home, or home+work exposures were 87{\%} to 92{\%} accurate. Workers reporting no SHS exposure were only 28{\%} accurate. CONCLUSIONS: Workers accurately reported their smoking status and workplace-home SHS exposures, but substantial numbers reporting {"}no exposures{"} had detectable levels of cotinine in their blood, indicating exposure to SHS.",
author = "Arheart, {Kristopher L.} and Lee, {David J.} and Fleming, {Lora E.} and LeBlanc, {William G.} and Dietz, {Noella A.} and McCollister, {Kathryn E.} and Wilkinson, {James D.} and Lewis, {John E.} and Clark, {John D.} and Davila, {Evelyn P.} and Bandiera, {Frank C.} and Erard, {Michael J.}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/JOM.0b013e318188b90a",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "1414--1420",
journal = "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine",
issn = "1076-2752",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of self-reported smoking and secondhand smoke exposure in the US workforce

T2 - The national health and nutrition examination surveys

AU - Arheart, Kristopher L.

AU - Lee, David J.

AU - Fleming, Lora E.

AU - LeBlanc, William G.

AU - Dietz, Noella A.

AU - McCollister, Kathryn E.

AU - Wilkinson, James D.

AU - Lewis, John E.

AU - Clark, John D.

AU - Davila, Evelyn P.

AU - Bandiera, Frank C.

AU - Erard, Michael J.

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Occupational health studies often rely on self-reported secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. This study examines the accuracy of self-reported tobacco use and SHS exposure. METHODS: Data on serum cotinine, self-reported tobacco use, and SHS exposure for US workers were extracted from three National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (n = 17,011). Serum cotinine levels were used to classify workers into SHS exposure categories. The percent agreement between self-reported tobacco use and SHS exposure with the cotinine categories was calculated. RESULTS: Workers reporting tobacco use were 88% accurate whereas workers reporting work, home, or home+work exposures were 87% to 92% accurate. Workers reporting no SHS exposure were only 28% accurate. CONCLUSIONS: Workers accurately reported their smoking status and workplace-home SHS exposures, but substantial numbers reporting "no exposures" had detectable levels of cotinine in their blood, indicating exposure to SHS.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Occupational health studies often rely on self-reported secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. This study examines the accuracy of self-reported tobacco use and SHS exposure. METHODS: Data on serum cotinine, self-reported tobacco use, and SHS exposure for US workers were extracted from three National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (n = 17,011). Serum cotinine levels were used to classify workers into SHS exposure categories. The percent agreement between self-reported tobacco use and SHS exposure with the cotinine categories was calculated. RESULTS: Workers reporting tobacco use were 88% accurate whereas workers reporting work, home, or home+work exposures were 87% to 92% accurate. Workers reporting no SHS exposure were only 28% accurate. CONCLUSIONS: Workers accurately reported their smoking status and workplace-home SHS exposures, but substantial numbers reporting "no exposures" had detectable levels of cotinine in their blood, indicating exposure to SHS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65849386277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65849386277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318188b90a

DO - 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318188b90a

M3 - Article

C2 - 19092497

AN - SCOPUS:65849386277

VL - 50

SP - 1414

EP - 1420

JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

SN - 1076-2752

IS - 12

ER -