AGE‐OF‐RECALL EFFECTS ON FAMILY‐OF‐ORIGIN RATINGS

Robert B. Hampson, Timothy L. Hyman, W. Robert Beavers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Family rating scales, particularly those tapping one's view of family of origin, rely heavily on one's summary impressions, perceptions, and recall of the family. Previous research has demonstrated that fairly consistent age, gender, and parent/offspring differences exist in ratings of current family functioning, but little information exists on such differences in rating one's family of origin. The present study had college‐age subjects rate current family, family when they were elementary‐school age, and family when they were 16 years old. Subjects were 141 college students (93 women, 48 men) who completed the self‐Report Family Inventory (SFI) of the Beavers Systems Model of Family Functioning separately for the three specified recall periods (age 10, age 16, and current family). Significant differences were found between age‐of‐recall groups, with recall ratings from age 10 significantly more competent, cohesive, and less conflicted than those from age 16; current family ratings were intermediate. Relatively few gender by age interactions were significant. Implications for the use and interpretation of family ratings and family‐of‐origin scales are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-67
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Marital and Family Therapy
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994

Fingerprint

rating
gender
system model
rating scale
Rodentia
parents
Students
Equipment and Supplies
interpretation
interaction
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

AGE‐OF‐RECALL EFFECTS ON FAMILY‐OF‐ORIGIN RATINGS. / Hampson, Robert B.; Hyman, Timothy L.; Beavers, W. Robert.

In: Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1994, p. 61-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hampson, Robert B. ; Hyman, Timothy L. ; Beavers, W. Robert. / AGE‐OF‐RECALL EFFECTS ON FAMILY‐OF‐ORIGIN RATINGS. In: Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 1994 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 61-67.
@article{54d1621aa3c2416b9d470e292f6ff874,
title = "AGE‐OF‐RECALL EFFECTS ON FAMILY‐OF‐ORIGIN RATINGS",
abstract = "Family rating scales, particularly those tapping one's view of family of origin, rely heavily on one's summary impressions, perceptions, and recall of the family. Previous research has demonstrated that fairly consistent age, gender, and parent/offspring differences exist in ratings of current family functioning, but little information exists on such differences in rating one's family of origin. The present study had college‐age subjects rate current family, family when they were elementary‐school age, and family when they were 16 years old. Subjects were 141 college students (93 women, 48 men) who completed the self‐Report Family Inventory (SFI) of the Beavers Systems Model of Family Functioning separately for the three specified recall periods (age 10, age 16, and current family). Significant differences were found between age‐of‐recall groups, with recall ratings from age 10 significantly more competent, cohesive, and less conflicted than those from age 16; current family ratings were intermediate. Relatively few gender by age interactions were significant. Implications for the use and interpretation of family ratings and family‐of‐origin scales are discussed.",
author = "Hampson, {Robert B.} and Hyman, {Timothy L.} and Beavers, {W. Robert}",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1111/j.1752-0606.1994.tb01012.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "61--67",
journal = "Journal of Marital and Family Therapy",
issn = "0194-472X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - AGE‐OF‐RECALL EFFECTS ON FAMILY‐OF‐ORIGIN RATINGS

AU - Hampson, Robert B.

AU - Hyman, Timothy L.

AU - Beavers, W. Robert

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Family rating scales, particularly those tapping one's view of family of origin, rely heavily on one's summary impressions, perceptions, and recall of the family. Previous research has demonstrated that fairly consistent age, gender, and parent/offspring differences exist in ratings of current family functioning, but little information exists on such differences in rating one's family of origin. The present study had college‐age subjects rate current family, family when they were elementary‐school age, and family when they were 16 years old. Subjects were 141 college students (93 women, 48 men) who completed the self‐Report Family Inventory (SFI) of the Beavers Systems Model of Family Functioning separately for the three specified recall periods (age 10, age 16, and current family). Significant differences were found between age‐of‐recall groups, with recall ratings from age 10 significantly more competent, cohesive, and less conflicted than those from age 16; current family ratings were intermediate. Relatively few gender by age interactions were significant. Implications for the use and interpretation of family ratings and family‐of‐origin scales are discussed.

AB - Family rating scales, particularly those tapping one's view of family of origin, rely heavily on one's summary impressions, perceptions, and recall of the family. Previous research has demonstrated that fairly consistent age, gender, and parent/offspring differences exist in ratings of current family functioning, but little information exists on such differences in rating one's family of origin. The present study had college‐age subjects rate current family, family when they were elementary‐school age, and family when they were 16 years old. Subjects were 141 college students (93 women, 48 men) who completed the self‐Report Family Inventory (SFI) of the Beavers Systems Model of Family Functioning separately for the three specified recall periods (age 10, age 16, and current family). Significant differences were found between age‐of‐recall groups, with recall ratings from age 10 significantly more competent, cohesive, and less conflicted than those from age 16; current family ratings were intermediate. Relatively few gender by age interactions were significant. Implications for the use and interpretation of family ratings and family‐of‐origin scales are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986706457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986706457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1994.tb01012.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1994.tb01012.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84986706457

VL - 20

SP - 61

EP - 67

JO - Journal of Marital and Family Therapy

JF - Journal of Marital and Family Therapy

SN - 0194-472X

IS - 1

ER -