All-advanced life support vs tiered-response ambulance systems

Jack Stout, Paul E. Pepe, Vincent N. Mosesso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this discussion, two principal types of ambulance deployment systems were compared and contrasted: 1) the multipurpose, sole-provider all-advanced life support (all-ALS) ambulance system in which all ambulance-related services (emergent and nonemergent) for a city or region are provided by one fleet of ambulances, each of which is staffed by ALS providers (paramedics); and 2) the tiered ambulance system (tiered) in which some 911 ambulances are staffed by paramedics and others are staffed by basic emergency medical technicians (EMT-Bs) who provide basic life support (BLS) care. When managed with advanced system status management (SSM) techniques, the multipurpose, sole-provider all-ALS ambulance system can significantly reduce response intervals while simultaneously providing both fiscal and operational efficiencies. It can also be used to readily integrate and expand the scope of services for the ambulance provider service, such as interfacility transfers, thus increasing revenues. On the other hand, in large urban centers, the tiered ambulance system can be used to reduce response intervals to critical calls, primarily through the use of sophisticated dispatch triage protocols. This approach requires fewer paramedics in the system and appears, in some systems, to also provide medical care advantages in terms of skills utilization for individual ALS providers as well as a more concentrated focus for medical supervision. Therefore, both of these deployment systems can offer certain advantages depending on local emergency medical services (EMS) system needs as well as the local philosophy of health care delivery. Applicability must therefore be considered in terms of local service demands and other factors that affect the EMS system, including catchment population, statutory and jurisdictional issues, available funding, accessibility of receiving facilities, and medical quality concerns.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume4
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Ambulances
Allied Health Personnel
Life Support Systems
Emergency Medical Services
Emergency Medical Technicians
Life Support Care
Triage
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Advanced life support
  • Ambulance
  • Emergency medical services
  • EMS
  • Paramedics
  • Public safety
  • Tiered-response

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

All-advanced life support vs tiered-response ambulance systems. / Stout, Jack; Pepe, Paul E.; Mosesso, Vincent N.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2000, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stout, Jack ; Pepe, Paul E. ; Mosesso, Vincent N. / All-advanced life support vs tiered-response ambulance systems. In: Prehospital Emergency Care. 2000 ; Vol. 4, No. 1. pp. 1-6.
@article{773a0dfd216141b9b8e990c9ff74b30c,
title = "All-advanced life support vs tiered-response ambulance systems",
abstract = "In this discussion, two principal types of ambulance deployment systems were compared and contrasted: 1) the multipurpose, sole-provider all-advanced life support (all-ALS) ambulance system in which all ambulance-related services (emergent and nonemergent) for a city or region are provided by one fleet of ambulances, each of which is staffed by ALS providers (paramedics); and 2) the tiered ambulance system (tiered) in which some 911 ambulances are staffed by paramedics and others are staffed by basic emergency medical technicians (EMT-Bs) who provide basic life support (BLS) care. When managed with advanced system status management (SSM) techniques, the multipurpose, sole-provider all-ALS ambulance system can significantly reduce response intervals while simultaneously providing both fiscal and operational efficiencies. It can also be used to readily integrate and expand the scope of services for the ambulance provider service, such as interfacility transfers, thus increasing revenues. On the other hand, in large urban centers, the tiered ambulance system can be used to reduce response intervals to critical calls, primarily through the use of sophisticated dispatch triage protocols. This approach requires fewer paramedics in the system and appears, in some systems, to also provide medical care advantages in terms of skills utilization for individual ALS providers as well as a more concentrated focus for medical supervision. Therefore, both of these deployment systems can offer certain advantages depending on local emergency medical services (EMS) system needs as well as the local philosophy of health care delivery. Applicability must therefore be considered in terms of local service demands and other factors that affect the EMS system, including catchment population, statutory and jurisdictional issues, available funding, accessibility of receiving facilities, and medical quality concerns.",
keywords = "Advanced life support, Ambulance, Emergency medical services, EMS, Paramedics, Public safety, Tiered-response",
author = "Jack Stout and Pepe, {Paul E.} and Mosesso, {Vincent N.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - All-advanced life support vs tiered-response ambulance systems

AU - Stout, Jack

AU - Pepe, Paul E.

AU - Mosesso, Vincent N.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - In this discussion, two principal types of ambulance deployment systems were compared and contrasted: 1) the multipurpose, sole-provider all-advanced life support (all-ALS) ambulance system in which all ambulance-related services (emergent and nonemergent) for a city or region are provided by one fleet of ambulances, each of which is staffed by ALS providers (paramedics); and 2) the tiered ambulance system (tiered) in which some 911 ambulances are staffed by paramedics and others are staffed by basic emergency medical technicians (EMT-Bs) who provide basic life support (BLS) care. When managed with advanced system status management (SSM) techniques, the multipurpose, sole-provider all-ALS ambulance system can significantly reduce response intervals while simultaneously providing both fiscal and operational efficiencies. It can also be used to readily integrate and expand the scope of services for the ambulance provider service, such as interfacility transfers, thus increasing revenues. On the other hand, in large urban centers, the tiered ambulance system can be used to reduce response intervals to critical calls, primarily through the use of sophisticated dispatch triage protocols. This approach requires fewer paramedics in the system and appears, in some systems, to also provide medical care advantages in terms of skills utilization for individual ALS providers as well as a more concentrated focus for medical supervision. Therefore, both of these deployment systems can offer certain advantages depending on local emergency medical services (EMS) system needs as well as the local philosophy of health care delivery. Applicability must therefore be considered in terms of local service demands and other factors that affect the EMS system, including catchment population, statutory and jurisdictional issues, available funding, accessibility of receiving facilities, and medical quality concerns.

AB - In this discussion, two principal types of ambulance deployment systems were compared and contrasted: 1) the multipurpose, sole-provider all-advanced life support (all-ALS) ambulance system in which all ambulance-related services (emergent and nonemergent) for a city or region are provided by one fleet of ambulances, each of which is staffed by ALS providers (paramedics); and 2) the tiered ambulance system (tiered) in which some 911 ambulances are staffed by paramedics and others are staffed by basic emergency medical technicians (EMT-Bs) who provide basic life support (BLS) care. When managed with advanced system status management (SSM) techniques, the multipurpose, sole-provider all-ALS ambulance system can significantly reduce response intervals while simultaneously providing both fiscal and operational efficiencies. It can also be used to readily integrate and expand the scope of services for the ambulance provider service, such as interfacility transfers, thus increasing revenues. On the other hand, in large urban centers, the tiered ambulance system can be used to reduce response intervals to critical calls, primarily through the use of sophisticated dispatch triage protocols. This approach requires fewer paramedics in the system and appears, in some systems, to also provide medical care advantages in terms of skills utilization for individual ALS providers as well as a more concentrated focus for medical supervision. Therefore, both of these deployment systems can offer certain advantages depending on local emergency medical services (EMS) system needs as well as the local philosophy of health care delivery. Applicability must therefore be considered in terms of local service demands and other factors that affect the EMS system, including catchment population, statutory and jurisdictional issues, available funding, accessibility of receiving facilities, and medical quality concerns.

KW - Advanced life support

KW - Ambulance

KW - Emergency medical services

KW - EMS

KW - Paramedics

KW - Public safety

KW - Tiered-response

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033962810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033962810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 1

ER -