An Evidence-Based Review of the Efficacy of Perioperative Analgesic Techniques for Breast Cancer-Related Surgery

Gloria S. Cheng, Brian M. Ilfeld

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To review the published evidence regarding perioperative analgesic techniques for breast cancer-related surgery.

Design: Topical review.

Methods: Randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) were selected for inclusion in the review. Also included were large prospective series providing estimates of potential risks and technical reports and small case series demonstrating a new technique or approaches of interest to clinicians.

Results: A total of 514 abstracts were reviewed, with 284 studies meeting criteria for full review. The evidence regarding preemptive ketamine, scheduled opioids, perioperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and intravenous lidocaine is mixed and deserves further investigation. There is strong evidence that both pregabalin and gabapentin provide analgesic benefits following breast surgery. There is minimal and conflicting data from high-quality randomized, controlled studies suggesting that directly infiltrating and/or infusing local anesthetic (liposome encapsulated or unencapsulated) into the surgical wound is a reliably effective analgesic. In contrast, there is a plethora of data demonstrating the potent analgesia, opioid sparing, and decreased opioid-related side effects from thoracic epidural infusion and both single-injection and continuous paravertebral nerve blocks (the latter two demonstrating decreased persistent post-surgical pain between 2.5 and 12 months). Techniques with limited-yet promising-data deserving additional investigation include brachial plexus blocks, cervical epidural infusion, interfascial plane blocks, and interpleural blocks.

Conclusions: While there are currently multiple promising analgesic techniques for surgical procedures of the breast that deserve further study, the only modalities demonstrated to provide potent, consistent perioperative pain control are thoracic epidural infusion and paravertebral nerve blocks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1344-1365
Number of pages22
JournalPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)
Volume18
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

Analgesics
Opioid Analgesics
Breast Neoplasms
Nerve Block
Breast
Thorax
Pain
Ketamine
Lidocaine
Local Anesthetics
Liposomes
Analgesia
Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Randomized Controlled Trials
Injections
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • Analgesia
  • Breast Surgery
  • Chronic Postoperative Pain
  • Mastectomy
  • Pain Control
  • Persistent Post-Surgical Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

An Evidence-Based Review of the Efficacy of Perioperative Analgesic Techniques for Breast Cancer-Related Surgery. / Cheng, Gloria S.; Ilfeld, Brian M.

In: Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), Vol. 18, No. 7, 01.07.2017, p. 1344-1365.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{6b6af30ebad443e0ad7d9f33fb0f6df0,
title = "An Evidence-Based Review of the Efficacy of Perioperative Analgesic Techniques for Breast Cancer-Related Surgery",
abstract = "Objective: To review the published evidence regarding perioperative analgesic techniques for breast cancer-related surgery.Design: Topical review.Methods: Randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) were selected for inclusion in the review. Also included were large prospective series providing estimates of potential risks and technical reports and small case series demonstrating a new technique or approaches of interest to clinicians.Results: A total of 514 abstracts were reviewed, with 284 studies meeting criteria for full review. The evidence regarding preemptive ketamine, scheduled opioids, perioperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and intravenous lidocaine is mixed and deserves further investigation. There is strong evidence that both pregabalin and gabapentin provide analgesic benefits following breast surgery. There is minimal and conflicting data from high-quality randomized, controlled studies suggesting that directly infiltrating and/or infusing local anesthetic (liposome encapsulated or unencapsulated) into the surgical wound is a reliably effective analgesic. In contrast, there is a plethora of data demonstrating the potent analgesia, opioid sparing, and decreased opioid-related side effects from thoracic epidural infusion and both single-injection and continuous paravertebral nerve blocks (the latter two demonstrating decreased persistent post-surgical pain between 2.5 and 12 months). Techniques with limited-yet promising-data deserving additional investigation include brachial plexus blocks, cervical epidural infusion, interfascial plane blocks, and interpleural blocks.Conclusions: While there are currently multiple promising analgesic techniques for surgical procedures of the breast that deserve further study, the only modalities demonstrated to provide potent, consistent perioperative pain control are thoracic epidural infusion and paravertebral nerve blocks.",
keywords = "Analgesia, Breast Surgery, Chronic Postoperative Pain, Mastectomy, Pain Control, Persistent Post-Surgical Pain",
author = "Cheng, {Gloria S.} and Ilfeld, {Brian M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/pm/pnw172",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "1344--1365",
journal = "Pain Medicine",
issn = "1526-2375",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Evidence-Based Review of the Efficacy of Perioperative Analgesic Techniques for Breast Cancer-Related Surgery

AU - Cheng, Gloria S.

AU - Ilfeld, Brian M.

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Objective: To review the published evidence regarding perioperative analgesic techniques for breast cancer-related surgery.Design: Topical review.Methods: Randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) were selected for inclusion in the review. Also included were large prospective series providing estimates of potential risks and technical reports and small case series demonstrating a new technique or approaches of interest to clinicians.Results: A total of 514 abstracts were reviewed, with 284 studies meeting criteria for full review. The evidence regarding preemptive ketamine, scheduled opioids, perioperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and intravenous lidocaine is mixed and deserves further investigation. There is strong evidence that both pregabalin and gabapentin provide analgesic benefits following breast surgery. There is minimal and conflicting data from high-quality randomized, controlled studies suggesting that directly infiltrating and/or infusing local anesthetic (liposome encapsulated or unencapsulated) into the surgical wound is a reliably effective analgesic. In contrast, there is a plethora of data demonstrating the potent analgesia, opioid sparing, and decreased opioid-related side effects from thoracic epidural infusion and both single-injection and continuous paravertebral nerve blocks (the latter two demonstrating decreased persistent post-surgical pain between 2.5 and 12 months). Techniques with limited-yet promising-data deserving additional investigation include brachial plexus blocks, cervical epidural infusion, interfascial plane blocks, and interpleural blocks.Conclusions: While there are currently multiple promising analgesic techniques for surgical procedures of the breast that deserve further study, the only modalities demonstrated to provide potent, consistent perioperative pain control are thoracic epidural infusion and paravertebral nerve blocks.

AB - Objective: To review the published evidence regarding perioperative analgesic techniques for breast cancer-related surgery.Design: Topical review.Methods: Randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) were selected for inclusion in the review. Also included were large prospective series providing estimates of potential risks and technical reports and small case series demonstrating a new technique or approaches of interest to clinicians.Results: A total of 514 abstracts were reviewed, with 284 studies meeting criteria for full review. The evidence regarding preemptive ketamine, scheduled opioids, perioperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and intravenous lidocaine is mixed and deserves further investigation. There is strong evidence that both pregabalin and gabapentin provide analgesic benefits following breast surgery. There is minimal and conflicting data from high-quality randomized, controlled studies suggesting that directly infiltrating and/or infusing local anesthetic (liposome encapsulated or unencapsulated) into the surgical wound is a reliably effective analgesic. In contrast, there is a plethora of data demonstrating the potent analgesia, opioid sparing, and decreased opioid-related side effects from thoracic epidural infusion and both single-injection and continuous paravertebral nerve blocks (the latter two demonstrating decreased persistent post-surgical pain between 2.5 and 12 months). Techniques with limited-yet promising-data deserving additional investigation include brachial plexus blocks, cervical epidural infusion, interfascial plane blocks, and interpleural blocks.Conclusions: While there are currently multiple promising analgesic techniques for surgical procedures of the breast that deserve further study, the only modalities demonstrated to provide potent, consistent perioperative pain control are thoracic epidural infusion and paravertebral nerve blocks.

KW - Analgesia

KW - Breast Surgery

KW - Chronic Postoperative Pain

KW - Mastectomy

KW - Pain Control

KW - Persistent Post-Surgical Pain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008355134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008355134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/pm/pnw172

DO - 10.1093/pm/pnw172

M3 - Review article

VL - 18

SP - 1344

EP - 1365

JO - Pain Medicine

JF - Pain Medicine

SN - 1526-2375

IS - 7

ER -