An intervention to decrease patient identification band errors in a Children's Hospital

P. D. Hain, B. Joers, M. Rush, J. Slayton, P. Throop, S. Hoagg, L. Allen, J. Grantham, J. K. Deshpande

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context Patient misidentification continues to be a quality and safety issue. There is a paucity of US data describing interventions to reduce identification band error rates. Setting Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt. Key measures Percentage of patients with defective identification bands. Strategies for change Web-based surveys were sent, asking hospital personnel to anonymously identify perceived barriers to reaching zero defects with identification bands. Corrective action plans were created and implemented with ideas from leadership, front-line staff and the online survey. Data from unannounced audits of patient identification bands were plotted on statistical process control charts and shared monthly with staff. All hospital personnel were expected to "stop the line" if there were any patient identification questions. Effects of change The first audit showed a defect rate of 20.4%. The original mean defect rate was 6.5%. After interventions and education, the new mean defect rate was 2.6%. Lessons learnt (a) The initial rate of patient identification band errors in the hospital was higher than expected. (b) The action resulting in most significant improvement was staff awareness of the problem, with clear expectations to immediately stop the line if a patient identification error was present. (c) Staff surveys are an excellent source of suggestions for combating patient identification issues. (d) Continued audit and data collection is necessary for sustainable staff focus and continued improvement. (e) Statistical process control charts are both an effective method to track results and an easily understood tool for sharing data with staff.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)244-247
Number of pages4
JournalQuality and Safety in Health Care
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Hospital Personnel
Identification (Psychology)
Information Dissemination
Safety
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

An intervention to decrease patient identification band errors in a Children's Hospital. / Hain, P. D.; Joers, B.; Rush, M.; Slayton, J.; Throop, P.; Hoagg, S.; Allen, L.; Grantham, J.; Deshpande, J. K.

In: Quality and Safety in Health Care, Vol. 19, No. 3, 06.2010, p. 244-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hain, PD, Joers, B, Rush, M, Slayton, J, Throop, P, Hoagg, S, Allen, L, Grantham, J & Deshpande, JK 2010, 'An intervention to decrease patient identification band errors in a Children's Hospital', Quality and Safety in Health Care, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 244-247. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2008.030288
Hain, P. D. ; Joers, B. ; Rush, M. ; Slayton, J. ; Throop, P. ; Hoagg, S. ; Allen, L. ; Grantham, J. ; Deshpande, J. K. / An intervention to decrease patient identification band errors in a Children's Hospital. In: Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2010 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 244-247.
@article{6e87790a90144976a05aab73ee78ee6e,
title = "An intervention to decrease patient identification band errors in a Children's Hospital",
abstract = "Context Patient misidentification continues to be a quality and safety issue. There is a paucity of US data describing interventions to reduce identification band error rates. Setting Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt. Key measures Percentage of patients with defective identification bands. Strategies for change Web-based surveys were sent, asking hospital personnel to anonymously identify perceived barriers to reaching zero defects with identification bands. Corrective action plans were created and implemented with ideas from leadership, front-line staff and the online survey. Data from unannounced audits of patient identification bands were plotted on statistical process control charts and shared monthly with staff. All hospital personnel were expected to {"}stop the line{"} if there were any patient identification questions. Effects of change The first audit showed a defect rate of 20.4{\%}. The original mean defect rate was 6.5{\%}. After interventions and education, the new mean defect rate was 2.6{\%}. Lessons learnt (a) The initial rate of patient identification band errors in the hospital was higher than expected. (b) The action resulting in most significant improvement was staff awareness of the problem, with clear expectations to immediately stop the line if a patient identification error was present. (c) Staff surveys are an excellent source of suggestions for combating patient identification issues. (d) Continued audit and data collection is necessary for sustainable staff focus and continued improvement. (e) Statistical process control charts are both an effective method to track results and an easily understood tool for sharing data with staff.",
author = "Hain, {P. D.} and B. Joers and M. Rush and J. Slayton and P. Throop and S. Hoagg and L. Allen and J. Grantham and Deshpande, {J. K.}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1136/qshc.2008.030288",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "244--247",
journal = "BMJ Quality and Safety",
issn = "2044-5415",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An intervention to decrease patient identification band errors in a Children's Hospital

AU - Hain, P. D.

AU - Joers, B.

AU - Rush, M.

AU - Slayton, J.

AU - Throop, P.

AU - Hoagg, S.

AU - Allen, L.

AU - Grantham, J.

AU - Deshpande, J. K.

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Context Patient misidentification continues to be a quality and safety issue. There is a paucity of US data describing interventions to reduce identification band error rates. Setting Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt. Key measures Percentage of patients with defective identification bands. Strategies for change Web-based surveys were sent, asking hospital personnel to anonymously identify perceived barriers to reaching zero defects with identification bands. Corrective action plans were created and implemented with ideas from leadership, front-line staff and the online survey. Data from unannounced audits of patient identification bands were plotted on statistical process control charts and shared monthly with staff. All hospital personnel were expected to "stop the line" if there were any patient identification questions. Effects of change The first audit showed a defect rate of 20.4%. The original mean defect rate was 6.5%. After interventions and education, the new mean defect rate was 2.6%. Lessons learnt (a) The initial rate of patient identification band errors in the hospital was higher than expected. (b) The action resulting in most significant improvement was staff awareness of the problem, with clear expectations to immediately stop the line if a patient identification error was present. (c) Staff surveys are an excellent source of suggestions for combating patient identification issues. (d) Continued audit and data collection is necessary for sustainable staff focus and continued improvement. (e) Statistical process control charts are both an effective method to track results and an easily understood tool for sharing data with staff.

AB - Context Patient misidentification continues to be a quality and safety issue. There is a paucity of US data describing interventions to reduce identification band error rates. Setting Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt. Key measures Percentage of patients with defective identification bands. Strategies for change Web-based surveys were sent, asking hospital personnel to anonymously identify perceived barriers to reaching zero defects with identification bands. Corrective action plans were created and implemented with ideas from leadership, front-line staff and the online survey. Data from unannounced audits of patient identification bands were plotted on statistical process control charts and shared monthly with staff. All hospital personnel were expected to "stop the line" if there were any patient identification questions. Effects of change The first audit showed a defect rate of 20.4%. The original mean defect rate was 6.5%. After interventions and education, the new mean defect rate was 2.6%. Lessons learnt (a) The initial rate of patient identification band errors in the hospital was higher than expected. (b) The action resulting in most significant improvement was staff awareness of the problem, with clear expectations to immediately stop the line if a patient identification error was present. (c) Staff surveys are an excellent source of suggestions for combating patient identification issues. (d) Continued audit and data collection is necessary for sustainable staff focus and continued improvement. (e) Statistical process control charts are both an effective method to track results and an easily understood tool for sharing data with staff.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953855306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953855306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/qshc.2008.030288

DO - 10.1136/qshc.2008.030288

M3 - Article

C2 - 20364035

AN - SCOPUS:77953855306

VL - 19

SP - 244

EP - 247

JO - BMJ Quality and Safety

JF - BMJ Quality and Safety

SN - 2044-5415

IS - 3

ER -