An update on research and outcomes in surgical management of vaginal mesh complications

Dominic Lee, Philippe E Zimmern

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Introduction: Stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse are major quality of life conditions affecting millions of individuals. Transvaginal mesh materials have been proposed to supplant native tissue repairs. However, these materials have opened a new field, meshology, devoted to the management of mesh complications. Areas covered: This review highlights some of the recent developments in this subspecialty which often requires a multidisciplinary approach. With better imaging, the preoperative assessment of mesh complications has been enhanced. Specialized centers with high volumes are best suited to handle these challenging patients who fear the many risks of mesh removal and the uncertainties of their clinical status after the removal procedure(s). However, despite a better classification system recommended by specialized societies, the multidimensional outcome of these repair procedures will require the adoption of outcome tools which can cover several domains such as urinary incontinence, pelvic pain, dyspareunia, bladder infections, to name a few. Expert opinion: The surgical approach to mesh removal is also evolving with some experts recommending complete removal while others prefer more selective excision. Finally, the long-term outcome of these mesh removal procedures is not yet fully known.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)569-580
Number of pages12
JournalExpert Review of Medical Devices
Volume16
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 3 2019

Fingerprint

Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Dyspareunia
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Stress Urinary Incontinence
Pelvic Pain
Expert Testimony
Urinary Incontinence
Repair
Uncertainty
Fear
Names
Urinary Bladder
Quality of Life
Infection
Tissue
Imaging techniques

Keywords

  • complications
  • FDA notification; mesh litigation
  • Mid-urethral sling
  • prolapse
  • stress urinary incontinence
  • vaginal mesh

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

An update on research and outcomes in surgical management of vaginal mesh complications. / Lee, Dominic; Zimmern, Philippe E.

In: Expert Review of Medical Devices, Vol. 16, No. 7, 03.07.2019, p. 569-580.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{fed2122416854386973a6eddd592db60,
title = "An update on research and outcomes in surgical management of vaginal mesh complications",
abstract = "Introduction: Stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse are major quality of life conditions affecting millions of individuals. Transvaginal mesh materials have been proposed to supplant native tissue repairs. However, these materials have opened a new field, meshology, devoted to the management of mesh complications. Areas covered: This review highlights some of the recent developments in this subspecialty which often requires a multidisciplinary approach. With better imaging, the preoperative assessment of mesh complications has been enhanced. Specialized centers with high volumes are best suited to handle these challenging patients who fear the many risks of mesh removal and the uncertainties of their clinical status after the removal procedure(s). However, despite a better classification system recommended by specialized societies, the multidimensional outcome of these repair procedures will require the adoption of outcome tools which can cover several domains such as urinary incontinence, pelvic pain, dyspareunia, bladder infections, to name a few. Expert opinion: The surgical approach to mesh removal is also evolving with some experts recommending complete removal while others prefer more selective excision. Finally, the long-term outcome of these mesh removal procedures is not yet fully known.",
keywords = "complications, FDA notification; mesh litigation, Mid-urethral sling, prolapse, stress urinary incontinence, vaginal mesh",
author = "Dominic Lee and Zimmern, {Philippe E}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/17434440.2019.1626230",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "569--580",
journal = "Expert Review of Medical Devices",
issn = "1743-4440",
publisher = "Expert Reviews Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An update on research and outcomes in surgical management of vaginal mesh complications

AU - Lee, Dominic

AU - Zimmern, Philippe E

PY - 2019/7/3

Y1 - 2019/7/3

N2 - Introduction: Stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse are major quality of life conditions affecting millions of individuals. Transvaginal mesh materials have been proposed to supplant native tissue repairs. However, these materials have opened a new field, meshology, devoted to the management of mesh complications. Areas covered: This review highlights some of the recent developments in this subspecialty which often requires a multidisciplinary approach. With better imaging, the preoperative assessment of mesh complications has been enhanced. Specialized centers with high volumes are best suited to handle these challenging patients who fear the many risks of mesh removal and the uncertainties of their clinical status after the removal procedure(s). However, despite a better classification system recommended by specialized societies, the multidimensional outcome of these repair procedures will require the adoption of outcome tools which can cover several domains such as urinary incontinence, pelvic pain, dyspareunia, bladder infections, to name a few. Expert opinion: The surgical approach to mesh removal is also evolving with some experts recommending complete removal while others prefer more selective excision. Finally, the long-term outcome of these mesh removal procedures is not yet fully known.

AB - Introduction: Stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse are major quality of life conditions affecting millions of individuals. Transvaginal mesh materials have been proposed to supplant native tissue repairs. However, these materials have opened a new field, meshology, devoted to the management of mesh complications. Areas covered: This review highlights some of the recent developments in this subspecialty which often requires a multidisciplinary approach. With better imaging, the preoperative assessment of mesh complications has been enhanced. Specialized centers with high volumes are best suited to handle these challenging patients who fear the many risks of mesh removal and the uncertainties of their clinical status after the removal procedure(s). However, despite a better classification system recommended by specialized societies, the multidimensional outcome of these repair procedures will require the adoption of outcome tools which can cover several domains such as urinary incontinence, pelvic pain, dyspareunia, bladder infections, to name a few. Expert opinion: The surgical approach to mesh removal is also evolving with some experts recommending complete removal while others prefer more selective excision. Finally, the long-term outcome of these mesh removal procedures is not yet fully known.

KW - complications

KW - FDA notification; mesh litigation

KW - Mid-urethral sling

KW - prolapse

KW - stress urinary incontinence

KW - vaginal mesh

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067795919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067795919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17434440.2019.1626230

DO - 10.1080/17434440.2019.1626230

M3 - Review article

C2 - 31177862

AN - SCOPUS:85067795919

VL - 16

SP - 569

EP - 580

JO - Expert Review of Medical Devices

JF - Expert Review of Medical Devices

SN - 1743-4440

IS - 7

ER -