Antithrombotic strategy in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network) registry

Renato D. Lopes, Eric D. Peterson, Anita Y. Chen, Matthew T. Roe, Tracy Y. Wang, E. Magnus Ohman, David J. Magid, P. Michael Ho, Stephen D. Wiviott, Benjamin M. Scirica, Karen P. Alexander

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to examine the use of and outcomes associated with antithrombotic strategies in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background A variety of antithrombotic strategies have been tested in clinical trials for NSTEMI patients treated with PCI. Methods Antithrombotic strategies for NSTEMI patients undergoing PCI at 217 ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network) hospitals from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2007, (n = 11,085) were classified into commonly observed antithrombotic groups: heparin alone (Hep alone; low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin), bivalirudin alone (Bival alone), heparin with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (Hep/GPI), and bivalirudin with GPI (Bival/GPI). Baseline characteristics are shown across treatment groups. In addition, unadjusted and adjusted rates of in-hospital major bleeding and death are shown. Results The standard strategy used was Hep/GPI (64%), followed by Hep or Bival alone (28%), and Bival/GPI (8%). Patients who received Hep or Bival alone were older with more comorbidities, higher baseline bleeding and mortality risk, and lower peak troponin. Compared with patients who received Hep/GPI , those who received Hep alone and Bival alone had lower rates of major bleeding (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42 to 0.65; adjusted OR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.60; respectively), yet only patients who received Bival alone had lower mortality (adjusted OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.71). Conclusions NSTEMI patients undergoing PCI are more likely to receive Bival or Hep alone when at higher baseline bleeding risk than when at lower baseline bleeding risk. Despite higher baseline risk, those receiving Bival or Hep alone had less bleeding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)669-677
Number of pages9
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume3
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • antithrombotic therapy
  • in-hospital major bleeding
  • mortality
  • non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
  • percutaneous coronary intervention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Antithrombotic strategy in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network) registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this