Appropriateness and utilization of cardiac CT: Implications for development of future criteria

Meagan K. Murphy, Thomas J. Brady, Khurram Nasir, G. Scott Gazelle, Fabian Bamberg, Quynh A. Truong, Wilfred S. Mamuya, Suhny Abbara, Thomas H. Lee, Ron Blankstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The cardiac CT (CCT) appropriateness criteria (AC) were jointly published by multiple societies to ensure effective utilization of CCT. We sought to determine how these criteria apply to CCT scans performed at a tertiary-care hospital. Methods and Results: Data were collected from medical records and interviews of 267 consecutive patients referred for CCT. Two physicians designated exam indication as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain as per AC, or "not known" if not listed in AC. CCT exam indication was appropriate in 47%, inappropriate in 9%, uncertain in 15%, and not known in 29%. The most common appropriate indication was evaluation of CAD in symptomatic patients with equivocal stress test, whereas the most common inappropriate referral was evaluation of asymptomatic patients with low pretest probability of CAD. Most exams (69%) were for evaluation of CAD, with the remaining exams performed to evaluate other elements of cardiac structure or function. Exams for these non-CAD indications were more likely to be appropriate and less likely to have an undetermined (uncertain or not known) level of appropriateness than those for CAD indications. There was no difference in exam appropriateness whether ordered by cardiologists or internists, but providers who completed training >25 years ago ordered fewer appropriate and more inappropriate exams than younger providers. Conclusions: In applying the AC to a large academic medical center, few CCT exams were inappropriate; however, many patients referred for CCT, particularly for evaluation of CAD, had an indication for which the level of appropriateness remained undetermined. Given the rapid adoption of CCT, these results emphasize the need to refine current criteria for appropriate utilization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)881-889
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Nuclear Cardiology
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2010

Fingerprint

Tertiary Healthcare
Exercise Test
Tertiary Care Centers
Medical Records
Referral and Consultation
Interviews
Physicians
Cardiologists

Keywords

  • Computed tomography (CT)
  • coronary artery disease
  • diagnostic
  • prognostic application

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Murphy, M. K., Brady, T. J., Nasir, K., Gazelle, G. S., Bamberg, F., Truong, Q. A., ... Blankstein, R. (2010). Appropriateness and utilization of cardiac CT: Implications for development of future criteria. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 17(5), 881-889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9252-0

Appropriateness and utilization of cardiac CT : Implications for development of future criteria. / Murphy, Meagan K.; Brady, Thomas J.; Nasir, Khurram; Gazelle, G. Scott; Bamberg, Fabian; Truong, Quynh A.; Mamuya, Wilfred S.; Abbara, Suhny; Lee, Thomas H.; Blankstein, Ron.

In: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, Vol. 17, No. 5, 10.2010, p. 881-889.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Murphy, MK, Brady, TJ, Nasir, K, Gazelle, GS, Bamberg, F, Truong, QA, Mamuya, WS, Abbara, S, Lee, TH & Blankstein, R 2010, 'Appropriateness and utilization of cardiac CT: Implications for development of future criteria', Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 881-889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9252-0
Murphy, Meagan K. ; Brady, Thomas J. ; Nasir, Khurram ; Gazelle, G. Scott ; Bamberg, Fabian ; Truong, Quynh A. ; Mamuya, Wilfred S. ; Abbara, Suhny ; Lee, Thomas H. ; Blankstein, Ron. / Appropriateness and utilization of cardiac CT : Implications for development of future criteria. In: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. 2010 ; Vol. 17, No. 5. pp. 881-889.
@article{9ded14ad10494d789f98ce95c5072ece,
title = "Appropriateness and utilization of cardiac CT: Implications for development of future criteria",
abstract = "Background: The cardiac CT (CCT) appropriateness criteria (AC) were jointly published by multiple societies to ensure effective utilization of CCT. We sought to determine how these criteria apply to CCT scans performed at a tertiary-care hospital. Methods and Results: Data were collected from medical records and interviews of 267 consecutive patients referred for CCT. Two physicians designated exam indication as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain as per AC, or {"}not known{"} if not listed in AC. CCT exam indication was appropriate in 47{\%}, inappropriate in 9{\%}, uncertain in 15{\%}, and not known in 29{\%}. The most common appropriate indication was evaluation of CAD in symptomatic patients with equivocal stress test, whereas the most common inappropriate referral was evaluation of asymptomatic patients with low pretest probability of CAD. Most exams (69{\%}) were for evaluation of CAD, with the remaining exams performed to evaluate other elements of cardiac structure or function. Exams for these non-CAD indications were more likely to be appropriate and less likely to have an undetermined (uncertain or not known) level of appropriateness than those for CAD indications. There was no difference in exam appropriateness whether ordered by cardiologists or internists, but providers who completed training >25 years ago ordered fewer appropriate and more inappropriate exams than younger providers. Conclusions: In applying the AC to a large academic medical center, few CCT exams were inappropriate; however, many patients referred for CCT, particularly for evaluation of CAD, had an indication for which the level of appropriateness remained undetermined. Given the rapid adoption of CCT, these results emphasize the need to refine current criteria for appropriate utilization.",
keywords = "Computed tomography (CT), coronary artery disease, diagnostic, prognostic application",
author = "Murphy, {Meagan K.} and Brady, {Thomas J.} and Khurram Nasir and Gazelle, {G. Scott} and Fabian Bamberg and Truong, {Quynh A.} and Mamuya, {Wilfred S.} and Suhny Abbara and Lee, {Thomas H.} and Ron Blankstein",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s12350-010-9252-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "881--889",
journal = "Journal of Nuclear Cardiology",
issn = "1071-3581",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Appropriateness and utilization of cardiac CT

T2 - Implications for development of future criteria

AU - Murphy, Meagan K.

AU - Brady, Thomas J.

AU - Nasir, Khurram

AU - Gazelle, G. Scott

AU - Bamberg, Fabian

AU - Truong, Quynh A.

AU - Mamuya, Wilfred S.

AU - Abbara, Suhny

AU - Lee, Thomas H.

AU - Blankstein, Ron

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - Background: The cardiac CT (CCT) appropriateness criteria (AC) were jointly published by multiple societies to ensure effective utilization of CCT. We sought to determine how these criteria apply to CCT scans performed at a tertiary-care hospital. Methods and Results: Data were collected from medical records and interviews of 267 consecutive patients referred for CCT. Two physicians designated exam indication as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain as per AC, or "not known" if not listed in AC. CCT exam indication was appropriate in 47%, inappropriate in 9%, uncertain in 15%, and not known in 29%. The most common appropriate indication was evaluation of CAD in symptomatic patients with equivocal stress test, whereas the most common inappropriate referral was evaluation of asymptomatic patients with low pretest probability of CAD. Most exams (69%) were for evaluation of CAD, with the remaining exams performed to evaluate other elements of cardiac structure or function. Exams for these non-CAD indications were more likely to be appropriate and less likely to have an undetermined (uncertain or not known) level of appropriateness than those for CAD indications. There was no difference in exam appropriateness whether ordered by cardiologists or internists, but providers who completed training >25 years ago ordered fewer appropriate and more inappropriate exams than younger providers. Conclusions: In applying the AC to a large academic medical center, few CCT exams were inappropriate; however, many patients referred for CCT, particularly for evaluation of CAD, had an indication for which the level of appropriateness remained undetermined. Given the rapid adoption of CCT, these results emphasize the need to refine current criteria for appropriate utilization.

AB - Background: The cardiac CT (CCT) appropriateness criteria (AC) were jointly published by multiple societies to ensure effective utilization of CCT. We sought to determine how these criteria apply to CCT scans performed at a tertiary-care hospital. Methods and Results: Data were collected from medical records and interviews of 267 consecutive patients referred for CCT. Two physicians designated exam indication as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain as per AC, or "not known" if not listed in AC. CCT exam indication was appropriate in 47%, inappropriate in 9%, uncertain in 15%, and not known in 29%. The most common appropriate indication was evaluation of CAD in symptomatic patients with equivocal stress test, whereas the most common inappropriate referral was evaluation of asymptomatic patients with low pretest probability of CAD. Most exams (69%) were for evaluation of CAD, with the remaining exams performed to evaluate other elements of cardiac structure or function. Exams for these non-CAD indications were more likely to be appropriate and less likely to have an undetermined (uncertain or not known) level of appropriateness than those for CAD indications. There was no difference in exam appropriateness whether ordered by cardiologists or internists, but providers who completed training >25 years ago ordered fewer appropriate and more inappropriate exams than younger providers. Conclusions: In applying the AC to a large academic medical center, few CCT exams were inappropriate; however, many patients referred for CCT, particularly for evaluation of CAD, had an indication for which the level of appropriateness remained undetermined. Given the rapid adoption of CCT, these results emphasize the need to refine current criteria for appropriate utilization.

KW - Computed tomography (CT)

KW - coronary artery disease

KW - diagnostic

KW - prognostic application

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957018155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957018155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12350-010-9252-0

DO - 10.1007/s12350-010-9252-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 20552311

AN - SCOPUS:77957018155

VL - 17

SP - 881

EP - 889

JO - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

JF - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

SN - 1071-3581

IS - 5

ER -