Assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans: Is reproducibility dependent on blood pressure variability?

Jan Willem Elting; Marit L. Sanders; Ronney B. Panerai; Marcel Aries; Edson Bor-Seng-Shu; Alexander Caicedo; Max Chacon; Erik D. Gommer; Sabine van Huffel; José L. Jara; Kyriaki Kostoglou; Adam Mahdi; Vasilis Z. Marmarelis; Georgios D. Mitsis; Martin Müller; Dragana Nikolic; Ricardo C. Nogueira; Stephen J. Payne; Corina Puppo; Dae C. Shin; David M. Simpson; Takashi Tarumi; Bernardo Yelicich; Rong Zhang; Jurgen A.H.R. Claassen

doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0227651

Assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans: Is reproducibility dependent on blood pressure variability?

Jan Willem Elting, Marit L. Sanders, Ronney B. Panerai, Marcel Aries, Edson Bor-Seng-Shu, Alexander Caicedo, Max Chacon, Erik D. Gommer, Sabine van Huffel, José L. Jara, Kyriaki Kostoglou, Adam Mahdi, Vasilis Z. Marmarelis, Georgios D. Mitsis, Martin Müller, Dragana Nikolic, Ricardo C. Nogueira, Stephen J. Payne, Corina Puppo, Dae C. ShinDavid M. Simpson, Takashi Tarumi, Bernardo Yelicich, Rong Zhang, Jurgen A.H.R. Claassen

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

We tested the influence of blood pressure variability on the reproducibility of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (DCA) estimates. Data were analyzed from the 2^nd CARNet bootstrap initiative, where mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) and end tidal CO2 were measured twice in 75 healthy subjects. DCA was analyzed by 14 different centers with a variety of different analysis methods. Intraclass Correlation (ICC) values increased significantly when subjects with low power spectral density MABP (PSD-MABP) values were removed from the analysis for all gain, phase and autoregulation index (ARI) parameters. Gain in the low frequency band (LF) had the highest ICC, followed by phase LF and gain in the very low frequency band. No significant differences were found between analysis methods for gain parameters, but for phase and ARI parameters, significant differences between the analysis methods were found. Alternatively, the Spearman-Brown prediction formula indicated that prolongation of the measurement duration up to 35 minutes may be needed to achieve good reproducibility for some DCA parameters. We conclude that poor DCA reproducibility (ICC<0.4) can improve to good (ICC > 0.6) values when cases with low PSD-MABP are removed, and probably also when measurement duration is increased.

Original language	English (US)
Article number	e0227651
Journal	PloS one
Volume	15
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0227651
State	Published - Jan 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
General

Access to Document

10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0227651

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans: Is reproducibility dependent on blood pressure variability?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Elting, J. W., Sanders, M. L., Panerai, R. B., Aries, M., Bor-Seng-Shu, E., Caicedo, A., Chacon, M., Gommer, E. D., van Huffel, S., Jara, J. L., Kostoglou, K., Mahdi, A., Marmarelis, V. Z., Mitsis, G. D., Müller, M., Nikolic, D., Nogueira, R. C., Payne, S. J., Puppo, C., ... Claassen, J. A. H. R. (2020). Assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans: Is reproducibility dependent on blood pressure variability? PloS one, 15(1), [e0227651]. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0227651

Assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans : Is reproducibility dependent on blood pressure variability? / Elting, Jan Willem; Sanders, Marit L.; Panerai, Ronney B.; Aries, Marcel; Bor-Seng-Shu, Edson; Caicedo, Alexander; Chacon, Max; Gommer, Erik D.; van Huffel, Sabine; Jara, José L.; Kostoglou, Kyriaki; Mahdi, Adam; Marmarelis, Vasilis Z.; Mitsis, Georgios D.; Müller, Martin; Nikolic, Dragana; Nogueira, Ricardo C.; Payne, Stephen J.; Puppo, Corina; Shin, Dae C.; Simpson, David M.; Tarumi, Takashi; Yelicich, Bernardo; Zhang, Rong; Claassen, Jurgen A.H.R.

In: PloS one, Vol. 15, No. 1, e0227651, 01.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Elting, JW, Sanders, ML, Panerai, RB, Aries, M, Bor-Seng-Shu, E, Caicedo, A, Chacon, M, Gommer, ED, van Huffel, S, Jara, JL, Kostoglou, K, Mahdi, A, Marmarelis, VZ, Mitsis, GD, Müller, M, Nikolic, D, Nogueira, RC, Payne, SJ, Puppo, C, Shin, DC, Simpson, DM, Tarumi, T, Yelicich, B, Zhang, R & Claassen, JAHR 2020, 'Assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans: Is reproducibility dependent on blood pressure variability?', PloS one, vol. 15, no. 1, e0227651. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0227651

Elting, Jan Willem ; Sanders, Marit L. ; Panerai, Ronney B. ; Aries, Marcel ; Bor-Seng-Shu, Edson ; Caicedo, Alexander ; Chacon, Max ; Gommer, Erik D. ; van Huffel, Sabine ; Jara, José L. ; Kostoglou, Kyriaki ; Mahdi, Adam ; Marmarelis, Vasilis Z. ; Mitsis, Georgios D. ; Müller, Martin ; Nikolic, Dragana ; Nogueira, Ricardo C. ; Payne, Stephen J. ; Puppo, Corina ; Shin, Dae C. ; Simpson, David M. ; Tarumi, Takashi ; Yelicich, Bernardo ; Zhang, Rong ; Claassen, Jurgen A.H.R. / Assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans : Is reproducibility dependent on blood pressure variability?. In: PloS one. 2020 ; Vol. 15, No. 1.

@article{0341c104303c4e27b925aa164ffac878,

title = "Assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans: Is reproducibility dependent on blood pressure variability?",

abstract = "We tested the influence of blood pressure variability on the reproducibility of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (DCA) estimates. Data were analyzed from the 2nd CARNet bootstrap initiative, where mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) and end tidal CO2 were measured twice in 75 healthy subjects. DCA was analyzed by 14 different centers with a variety of different analysis methods. Intraclass Correlation (ICC) values increased significantly when subjects with low power spectral density MABP (PSD-MABP) values were removed from the analysis for all gain, phase and autoregulation index (ARI) parameters. Gain in the low frequency band (LF) had the highest ICC, followed by phase LF and gain in the very low frequency band. No significant differences were found between analysis methods for gain parameters, but for phase and ARI parameters, significant differences between the analysis methods were found. Alternatively, the Spearman-Brown prediction formula indicated that prolongation of the measurement duration up to 35 minutes may be needed to achieve good reproducibility for some DCA parameters. We conclude that poor DCA reproducibility (ICC<0.4) can improve to good (ICC > 0.6) values when cases with low PSD-MABP are removed, and probably also when measurement duration is increased.",

author = "Elting, {Jan Willem} and Sanders, {Marit L.} and Panerai, {Ronney B.} and Marcel Aries and Edson Bor-Seng-Shu and Alexander Caicedo and Max Chacon and Gommer, {Erik D.} and {van Huffel}, Sabine and Jara, {Jos{\'e} L.} and Kyriaki Kostoglou and Adam Mahdi and Marmarelis, {Vasilis Z.} and Mitsis, {Georgios D.} and Martin M{\"u}ller and Dragana Nikolic and Nogueira, {Ricardo C.} and Payne, {Stephen J.} and Corina Puppo and Shin, {Dae C.} and Simpson, {David M.} and Takashi Tarumi and Bernardo Yelicich and Rong Zhang and Claassen, {Jurgen A.H.R.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Elting et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.",

year = "2020",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0227651",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "15",

journal = "PLoS One",

issn = "1932-6203",

publisher = "Public Library of Science",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans

T2 - Is reproducibility dependent on blood pressure variability?

AU - Elting, Jan Willem

AU - Sanders, Marit L.

AU - Panerai, Ronney B.

AU - Aries, Marcel

AU - Bor-Seng-Shu, Edson

AU - Caicedo, Alexander

AU - Chacon, Max

AU - Gommer, Erik D.

AU - van Huffel, Sabine

AU - Jara, José L.

AU - Kostoglou, Kyriaki

AU - Mahdi, Adam

AU - Marmarelis, Vasilis Z.

AU - Mitsis, Georgios D.

AU - Müller, Martin

AU - Nikolic, Dragana

AU - Nogueira, Ricardo C.

AU - Payne, Stephen J.

AU - Puppo, Corina

AU - Shin, Dae C.

AU - Simpson, David M.

AU - Tarumi, Takashi

AU - Yelicich, Bernardo

AU - Zhang, Rong

AU - Claassen, Jurgen A.H.R.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Elting et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

PY - 2020/1

Y1 - 2020/1

N2 - We tested the influence of blood pressure variability on the reproducibility of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (DCA) estimates. Data were analyzed from the 2nd CARNet bootstrap initiative, where mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) and end tidal CO2 were measured twice in 75 healthy subjects. DCA was analyzed by 14 different centers with a variety of different analysis methods. Intraclass Correlation (ICC) values increased significantly when subjects with low power spectral density MABP (PSD-MABP) values were removed from the analysis for all gain, phase and autoregulation index (ARI) parameters. Gain in the low frequency band (LF) had the highest ICC, followed by phase LF and gain in the very low frequency band. No significant differences were found between analysis methods for gain parameters, but for phase and ARI parameters, significant differences between the analysis methods were found. Alternatively, the Spearman-Brown prediction formula indicated that prolongation of the measurement duration up to 35 minutes may be needed to achieve good reproducibility for some DCA parameters. We conclude that poor DCA reproducibility (ICC<0.4) can improve to good (ICC > 0.6) values when cases with low PSD-MABP are removed, and probably also when measurement duration is increased.

AB - We tested the influence of blood pressure variability on the reproducibility of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (DCA) estimates. Data were analyzed from the 2nd CARNet bootstrap initiative, where mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) and end tidal CO2 were measured twice in 75 healthy subjects. DCA was analyzed by 14 different centers with a variety of different analysis methods. Intraclass Correlation (ICC) values increased significantly when subjects with low power spectral density MABP (PSD-MABP) values were removed from the analysis for all gain, phase and autoregulation index (ARI) parameters. Gain in the low frequency band (LF) had the highest ICC, followed by phase LF and gain in the very low frequency band. No significant differences were found between analysis methods for gain parameters, but for phase and ARI parameters, significant differences between the analysis methods were found. Alternatively, the Spearman-Brown prediction formula indicated that prolongation of the measurement duration up to 35 minutes may be needed to achieve good reproducibility for some DCA parameters. We conclude that poor DCA reproducibility (ICC<0.4) can improve to good (ICC > 0.6) values when cases with low PSD-MABP are removed, and probably also when measurement duration is increased.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077765738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077765738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0227651

DO - 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0227651

M3 - Article

C2 - 31923919

AN - SCOPUS:85077765738

VL - 15

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 1

M1 - e0227651

ER -

Assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans: Is reproducibility dependent on blood pressure variability?

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this