Benchmarking emergency department thoracotomy: Using trauma video review to generate procedural norms

Ryan P. Dumas, Kristen M. Chreiman, Mark J. Seamon, Jeremy W. Cannon, Patrick M. Reilly, Jason D. Christie, Daniel N. Holena

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) must be rapid and well-executed. Currently there are no defined benchmarks for EDT procedural milestones. We hypothesized that trauma video review (TVR) can be used to define the ‘normative EDT’ and generate procedural benchmarks. As a secondary aim, we hypothesized that data collected by TVR would have less missingness and bias than data collected by review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). Methods: We used continuously recording video to review all EDTs performed at our centre during the study period. Using skin incision as start time, we defined four procedural milestones for EDT: 1. Decompression of the right chest (tube thoracostomy, finger thoracostomy, or clamshell thoracotomy with transverse sternotomy performed in conjunction with left anterolateral thoracotomy) 2. Retractor deployment 3. Pericardiotomy 4. Aortic Cross-clamp. EDTs with any milestone time ≥ 75th percentile of time or during which a milestone was omitted were identified as outliers. We compared rates of missingness in data collected by TVR and EMR using McNemar's test. Results: 44 EDTs were included from the study period. Patients had a median age of 30 [IQR 25–44] and were predominantly African-American (95%) males (93%) with penetrating trauma (95%). From skin incision, median times in minutes to milestones were as follows: right chest decompression: 2.11 [IQR 0.68–2.83], retractor deployment 1.35 [IQR 0.96–1.85], pericardiotomy 2.35 [IQR 1.85–3.75], aortic cross-clamp 3.71 [IQR 2.83–5.77]. In total, 28/44 (64%) of EDTs were either high outliers for one or more benchmarks or had milestones that were omitted. For all milestones, rates of missingness for TVR data were lower than EMR data (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Video review can be used to define normative times for the procedural milestones of EDT. Steps exceeding the 75th percentile of time were common, with over half of EDTs having at least one milestone as an outlier. Data quality is higher using TVR compared to EMR collection. Future work should seek to determine if minimizing procedural technical outliers improves patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1687-1692
Number of pages6
JournalInjury
Volume49
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Benchmarking
Thoracotomy
Hospital Emergency Service
Electronic Health Records
Wounds and Injuries
Thoracostomy
Pericardiectomy
Decompression
Chest Tubes
Video Recording
Skin
Sternotomy
African Americans
Fingers
Thorax

Keywords

  • Emergency department
  • Quality improvement
  • Resuscitation
  • thoracotomy
  • Video review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Dumas, R. P., Chreiman, K. M., Seamon, M. J., Cannon, J. W., Reilly, P. M., Christie, J. D., & Holena, D. N. (2018). Benchmarking emergency department thoracotomy: Using trauma video review to generate procedural norms. Injury, 49(9), 1687-1692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.05.010

Benchmarking emergency department thoracotomy : Using trauma video review to generate procedural norms. / Dumas, Ryan P.; Chreiman, Kristen M.; Seamon, Mark J.; Cannon, Jeremy W.; Reilly, Patrick M.; Christie, Jason D.; Holena, Daniel N.

In: Injury, Vol. 49, No. 9, 09.2018, p. 1687-1692.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dumas, RP, Chreiman, KM, Seamon, MJ, Cannon, JW, Reilly, PM, Christie, JD & Holena, DN 2018, 'Benchmarking emergency department thoracotomy: Using trauma video review to generate procedural norms', Injury, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 1687-1692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.05.010
Dumas, Ryan P. ; Chreiman, Kristen M. ; Seamon, Mark J. ; Cannon, Jeremy W. ; Reilly, Patrick M. ; Christie, Jason D. ; Holena, Daniel N. / Benchmarking emergency department thoracotomy : Using trauma video review to generate procedural norms. In: Injury. 2018 ; Vol. 49, No. 9. pp. 1687-1692.
@article{4e8273cd18a94ea6a61798a5d416b878,
title = "Benchmarking emergency department thoracotomy: Using trauma video review to generate procedural norms",
abstract = "Introduction: Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) must be rapid and well-executed. Currently there are no defined benchmarks for EDT procedural milestones. We hypothesized that trauma video review (TVR) can be used to define the ‘normative EDT’ and generate procedural benchmarks. As a secondary aim, we hypothesized that data collected by TVR would have less missingness and bias than data collected by review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). Methods: We used continuously recording video to review all EDTs performed at our centre during the study period. Using skin incision as start time, we defined four procedural milestones for EDT: 1. Decompression of the right chest (tube thoracostomy, finger thoracostomy, or clamshell thoracotomy with transverse sternotomy performed in conjunction with left anterolateral thoracotomy) 2. Retractor deployment 3. Pericardiotomy 4. Aortic Cross-clamp. EDTs with any milestone time ≥ 75th percentile of time or during which a milestone was omitted were identified as outliers. We compared rates of missingness in data collected by TVR and EMR using McNemar's test. Results: 44 EDTs were included from the study period. Patients had a median age of 30 [IQR 25–44] and were predominantly African-American (95{\%}) males (93{\%}) with penetrating trauma (95{\%}). From skin incision, median times in minutes to milestones were as follows: right chest decompression: 2.11 [IQR 0.68–2.83], retractor deployment 1.35 [IQR 0.96–1.85], pericardiotomy 2.35 [IQR 1.85–3.75], aortic cross-clamp 3.71 [IQR 2.83–5.77]. In total, 28/44 (64{\%}) of EDTs were either high outliers for one or more benchmarks or had milestones that were omitted. For all milestones, rates of missingness for TVR data were lower than EMR data (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Video review can be used to define normative times for the procedural milestones of EDT. Steps exceeding the 75th percentile of time were common, with over half of EDTs having at least one milestone as an outlier. Data quality is higher using TVR compared to EMR collection. Future work should seek to determine if minimizing procedural technical outliers improves patient outcomes.",
keywords = "Emergency department, Quality improvement, Resuscitation, thoracotomy, Video review",
author = "Dumas, {Ryan P.} and Chreiman, {Kristen M.} and Seamon, {Mark J.} and Cannon, {Jeremy W.} and Reilly, {Patrick M.} and Christie, {Jason D.} and Holena, {Daniel N.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.injury.2018.05.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "1687--1692",
journal = "Injury",
issn = "0020-1383",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benchmarking emergency department thoracotomy

T2 - Using trauma video review to generate procedural norms

AU - Dumas, Ryan P.

AU - Chreiman, Kristen M.

AU - Seamon, Mark J.

AU - Cannon, Jeremy W.

AU - Reilly, Patrick M.

AU - Christie, Jason D.

AU - Holena, Daniel N.

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Introduction: Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) must be rapid and well-executed. Currently there are no defined benchmarks for EDT procedural milestones. We hypothesized that trauma video review (TVR) can be used to define the ‘normative EDT’ and generate procedural benchmarks. As a secondary aim, we hypothesized that data collected by TVR would have less missingness and bias than data collected by review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). Methods: We used continuously recording video to review all EDTs performed at our centre during the study period. Using skin incision as start time, we defined four procedural milestones for EDT: 1. Decompression of the right chest (tube thoracostomy, finger thoracostomy, or clamshell thoracotomy with transverse sternotomy performed in conjunction with left anterolateral thoracotomy) 2. Retractor deployment 3. Pericardiotomy 4. Aortic Cross-clamp. EDTs with any milestone time ≥ 75th percentile of time or during which a milestone was omitted were identified as outliers. We compared rates of missingness in data collected by TVR and EMR using McNemar's test. Results: 44 EDTs were included from the study period. Patients had a median age of 30 [IQR 25–44] and were predominantly African-American (95%) males (93%) with penetrating trauma (95%). From skin incision, median times in minutes to milestones were as follows: right chest decompression: 2.11 [IQR 0.68–2.83], retractor deployment 1.35 [IQR 0.96–1.85], pericardiotomy 2.35 [IQR 1.85–3.75], aortic cross-clamp 3.71 [IQR 2.83–5.77]. In total, 28/44 (64%) of EDTs were either high outliers for one or more benchmarks or had milestones that were omitted. For all milestones, rates of missingness for TVR data were lower than EMR data (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Video review can be used to define normative times for the procedural milestones of EDT. Steps exceeding the 75th percentile of time were common, with over half of EDTs having at least one milestone as an outlier. Data quality is higher using TVR compared to EMR collection. Future work should seek to determine if minimizing procedural technical outliers improves patient outcomes.

AB - Introduction: Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) must be rapid and well-executed. Currently there are no defined benchmarks for EDT procedural milestones. We hypothesized that trauma video review (TVR) can be used to define the ‘normative EDT’ and generate procedural benchmarks. As a secondary aim, we hypothesized that data collected by TVR would have less missingness and bias than data collected by review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). Methods: We used continuously recording video to review all EDTs performed at our centre during the study period. Using skin incision as start time, we defined four procedural milestones for EDT: 1. Decompression of the right chest (tube thoracostomy, finger thoracostomy, or clamshell thoracotomy with transverse sternotomy performed in conjunction with left anterolateral thoracotomy) 2. Retractor deployment 3. Pericardiotomy 4. Aortic Cross-clamp. EDTs with any milestone time ≥ 75th percentile of time or during which a milestone was omitted were identified as outliers. We compared rates of missingness in data collected by TVR and EMR using McNemar's test. Results: 44 EDTs were included from the study period. Patients had a median age of 30 [IQR 25–44] and were predominantly African-American (95%) males (93%) with penetrating trauma (95%). From skin incision, median times in minutes to milestones were as follows: right chest decompression: 2.11 [IQR 0.68–2.83], retractor deployment 1.35 [IQR 0.96–1.85], pericardiotomy 2.35 [IQR 1.85–3.75], aortic cross-clamp 3.71 [IQR 2.83–5.77]. In total, 28/44 (64%) of EDTs were either high outliers for one or more benchmarks or had milestones that were omitted. For all milestones, rates of missingness for TVR data were lower than EMR data (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Video review can be used to define normative times for the procedural milestones of EDT. Steps exceeding the 75th percentile of time were common, with over half of EDTs having at least one milestone as an outlier. Data quality is higher using TVR compared to EMR collection. Future work should seek to determine if minimizing procedural technical outliers improves patient outcomes.

KW - Emergency department

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Resuscitation

KW - thoracotomy

KW - Video review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047833925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047833925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.injury.2018.05.010

DO - 10.1016/j.injury.2018.05.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 29866625

AN - SCOPUS:85047833925

VL - 49

SP - 1687

EP - 1692

JO - Injury

JF - Injury

SN - 0020-1383

IS - 9

ER -