Bone-anchored hearing aid subjective benefit for unilateral deafness

John W. House, Joe Walter Kutz, Janice Chung, Laurel M. Fisher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: Determine the benefit of the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) in patients with unilateral deafness. Study Design: Retrospective case series and prospective questionnaire study at a tertiary referral center. Methods: Patients with unilateral deafness of various etiologies who were implanted with a BAHA (n = 126) or not implanted with a BAHA after a translabyrinthine craniotomy (n = 126) were mailed questionnaires. A total of 139 patients (55%) responded to the questionnaires. Patients who were implanted with a BAHA received a general questionnaire concerning BAHA usage, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), and the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire (SSQ). Patients not implanted with a BAHA received only the SSQ hearing questionnaire. Results: Patients with unilateral deafness demonstrated a benefit with BAHA use on the APHAB. Most improvement with the BAHA was seen in the Background Noise subscale, with a 17.4% improvement. Ease of Communication and Reverberation subscales also demonstrated an 11.6% and 13.2% benefit, respectively. Patients with a BAHA demonstrated better scores in the SSQ Speech subscale when compared to unilaterally deaf patients who did not have a BAHA, although this difference was not significant. Conclusions: The APHAB demonstrated significant benefit with the use of a BAHA in patients with unilateral deafness. Although the SSQ speech subscale showed overall improvement in auditory disability with the use of a BAHA, this difference was not significant. However, the SSQ hearing questionnaire demonstrated specific situations were the BAHA is most useful.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)601-607
Number of pages7
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume120
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Unilateral Hearing Loss
Hearing Aids
Bone and Bones
Hearing

Keywords

  • APHAB
  • Benefit
  • Bone-anchored hearing aid
  • Unilateral deafness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Bone-anchored hearing aid subjective benefit for unilateral deafness. / House, John W.; Kutz, Joe Walter; Chung, Janice; Fisher, Laurel M.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 120, No. 3, 03.2010, p. 601-607.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

House, John W. ; Kutz, Joe Walter ; Chung, Janice ; Fisher, Laurel M. / Bone-anchored hearing aid subjective benefit for unilateral deafness. In: Laryngoscope. 2010 ; Vol. 120, No. 3. pp. 601-607.
@article{4e34b4cfdf6b498faf21b03835516c33,
title = "Bone-anchored hearing aid subjective benefit for unilateral deafness",
abstract = "Objectives/Hypothesis: Determine the benefit of the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) in patients with unilateral deafness. Study Design: Retrospective case series and prospective questionnaire study at a tertiary referral center. Methods: Patients with unilateral deafness of various etiologies who were implanted with a BAHA (n = 126) or not implanted with a BAHA after a translabyrinthine craniotomy (n = 126) were mailed questionnaires. A total of 139 patients (55{\%}) responded to the questionnaires. Patients who were implanted with a BAHA received a general questionnaire concerning BAHA usage, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), and the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire (SSQ). Patients not implanted with a BAHA received only the SSQ hearing questionnaire. Results: Patients with unilateral deafness demonstrated a benefit with BAHA use on the APHAB. Most improvement with the BAHA was seen in the Background Noise subscale, with a 17.4{\%} improvement. Ease of Communication and Reverberation subscales also demonstrated an 11.6{\%} and 13.2{\%} benefit, respectively. Patients with a BAHA demonstrated better scores in the SSQ Speech subscale when compared to unilaterally deaf patients who did not have a BAHA, although this difference was not significant. Conclusions: The APHAB demonstrated significant benefit with the use of a BAHA in patients with unilateral deafness. Although the SSQ speech subscale showed overall improvement in auditory disability with the use of a BAHA, this difference was not significant. However, the SSQ hearing questionnaire demonstrated specific situations were the BAHA is most useful.",
keywords = "APHAB, Benefit, Bone-anchored hearing aid, Unilateral deafness",
author = "House, {John W.} and Kutz, {Joe Walter} and Janice Chung and Fisher, {Laurel M.}",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1002/lary.20802",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "120",
pages = "601--607",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bone-anchored hearing aid subjective benefit for unilateral deafness

AU - House, John W.

AU - Kutz, Joe Walter

AU - Chung, Janice

AU - Fisher, Laurel M.

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Objectives/Hypothesis: Determine the benefit of the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) in patients with unilateral deafness. Study Design: Retrospective case series and prospective questionnaire study at a tertiary referral center. Methods: Patients with unilateral deafness of various etiologies who were implanted with a BAHA (n = 126) or not implanted with a BAHA after a translabyrinthine craniotomy (n = 126) were mailed questionnaires. A total of 139 patients (55%) responded to the questionnaires. Patients who were implanted with a BAHA received a general questionnaire concerning BAHA usage, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), and the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire (SSQ). Patients not implanted with a BAHA received only the SSQ hearing questionnaire. Results: Patients with unilateral deafness demonstrated a benefit with BAHA use on the APHAB. Most improvement with the BAHA was seen in the Background Noise subscale, with a 17.4% improvement. Ease of Communication and Reverberation subscales also demonstrated an 11.6% and 13.2% benefit, respectively. Patients with a BAHA demonstrated better scores in the SSQ Speech subscale when compared to unilaterally deaf patients who did not have a BAHA, although this difference was not significant. Conclusions: The APHAB demonstrated significant benefit with the use of a BAHA in patients with unilateral deafness. Although the SSQ speech subscale showed overall improvement in auditory disability with the use of a BAHA, this difference was not significant. However, the SSQ hearing questionnaire demonstrated specific situations were the BAHA is most useful.

AB - Objectives/Hypothesis: Determine the benefit of the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) in patients with unilateral deafness. Study Design: Retrospective case series and prospective questionnaire study at a tertiary referral center. Methods: Patients with unilateral deafness of various etiologies who were implanted with a BAHA (n = 126) or not implanted with a BAHA after a translabyrinthine craniotomy (n = 126) were mailed questionnaires. A total of 139 patients (55%) responded to the questionnaires. Patients who were implanted with a BAHA received a general questionnaire concerning BAHA usage, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), and the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire (SSQ). Patients not implanted with a BAHA received only the SSQ hearing questionnaire. Results: Patients with unilateral deafness demonstrated a benefit with BAHA use on the APHAB. Most improvement with the BAHA was seen in the Background Noise subscale, with a 17.4% improvement. Ease of Communication and Reverberation subscales also demonstrated an 11.6% and 13.2% benefit, respectively. Patients with a BAHA demonstrated better scores in the SSQ Speech subscale when compared to unilaterally deaf patients who did not have a BAHA, although this difference was not significant. Conclusions: The APHAB demonstrated significant benefit with the use of a BAHA in patients with unilateral deafness. Although the SSQ speech subscale showed overall improvement in auditory disability with the use of a BAHA, this difference was not significant. However, the SSQ hearing questionnaire demonstrated specific situations were the BAHA is most useful.

KW - APHAB

KW - Benefit

KW - Bone-anchored hearing aid

KW - Unilateral deafness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949505774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949505774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.20802

DO - 10.1002/lary.20802

M3 - Article

C2 - 20131363

AN - SCOPUS:77949505774

VL - 120

SP - 601

EP - 607

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 3

ER -