Cadaveric and engineering analysis of the septal L-strut

Ted Mau, Sheng Taur Mau, David W. Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify patterns of failure of the L-strut, to identify elements of the nasal framework that support the L-strut, and to investigate the effect of altering L-strut design on its stability. STUDY DESIGN: Laboratory study with human cadaveric heads and computational modeling. METHODS: Directional forces were applied to cadaveric L-struts and patterns of failure with incremental force were noted. Computational modeling using the finite element method (FEM) was employed to determine quantitatively the effect of various modifications on the stability of the L-strut. RESULTS: The L-strut was found to respond to frontal force initially by buckling. This buckling was reversible until the force exceeded a certain threshold when the L-strut broke at the bony-cartilaginous junction. The threshold force varied depending on the length of the overlap with the bony vault. Intact mucoperichondrium provided significant stability. Modeling with FEM showed that the preservation of a triangular piece of cartilage at the dorsal anchor of a narrowed L-strut can offset some of the loss in mechanical stability. CONCLUSIONS: Intrinsic elasticity of the septal cartilage, the mucoperichondrial flap, and overlap with the bony vault all contribute to the stability of the L-strut, which is enhanced by preserving a small segment of cartilage at the bony-cartilaginous junction of the dorsal L-strut.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1902-1906
Number of pages5
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume117
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Keywords

  • Bony-cartilaginous junction
  • L-strut; finite element modeling
  • Nasal septum
  • Rhinoplasty
  • Septoplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cadaveric and engineering analysis of the septal L-strut'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this