Chest radiography in the initial episode of bronchospasm in children

Can clinical variables predict pathologic findings?

C. M. Walsh-Kelly, M. K. Kim, H. M. Hennes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objective: To determine whether historical or clinical variables can accurately discriminate among children, experiencing a first episode of bronchospasm, with chest radiography findings that are normal, consistent with reactive airway disease (RAD), or pathologic. Methods: We assembled a prospective case series of patients in our tertiary, academic, pediatric emergency department. All patients aged newborn to 18 years presenting to the ED with their initial episode of wheezing were enrolled. Results: Six hundred thirty-three patients presented to the ED during the study period. Pathologic radiographic findings were identified in 39 (6.2%). Radiographs revealing normal findings and evidence of RAD were noted in 25.4% and 68%, respectively. No single variable accurately predicted all pathologic radiographs. Discriminant function analysis identified nine variables, which we combined into a model. The model failed to accurately discriminate among patients with radiographs revealing evidence of a pathologic condition, normal chest findings, and RAD. Conclusion: No clinical variables, isolated or combined into a model, accurately identify patients with pathologic radiography findings. Continued use of chest radiography as a diagnostic intervention in the initial episode of childhood bronchospasm is recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)391-395
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume28
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Bronchial Spasm
Radiography
Thorax
Respiratory Sounds
Discriminant Analysis
Hospital Emergency Service
Newborn Infant
Pediatrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Chest radiography in the initial episode of bronchospasm in children : Can clinical variables predict pathologic findings? / Walsh-Kelly, C. M.; Kim, M. K.; Hennes, H. M.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 4, 1996, p. 391-395.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d96534be4f9343ba829d3eed8368758b,
title = "Chest radiography in the initial episode of bronchospasm in children: Can clinical variables predict pathologic findings?",
abstract = "Study objective: To determine whether historical or clinical variables can accurately discriminate among children, experiencing a first episode of bronchospasm, with chest radiography findings that are normal, consistent with reactive airway disease (RAD), or pathologic. Methods: We assembled a prospective case series of patients in our tertiary, academic, pediatric emergency department. All patients aged newborn to 18 years presenting to the ED with their initial episode of wheezing were enrolled. Results: Six hundred thirty-three patients presented to the ED during the study period. Pathologic radiographic findings were identified in 39 (6.2{\%}). Radiographs revealing normal findings and evidence of RAD were noted in 25.4{\%} and 68{\%}, respectively. No single variable accurately predicted all pathologic radiographs. Discriminant function analysis identified nine variables, which we combined into a model. The model failed to accurately discriminate among patients with radiographs revealing evidence of a pathologic condition, normal chest findings, and RAD. Conclusion: No clinical variables, isolated or combined into a model, accurately identify patients with pathologic radiography findings. Continued use of chest radiography as a diagnostic intervention in the initial episode of childhood bronchospasm is recommended.",
author = "Walsh-Kelly, {C. M.} and Kim, {M. K.} and Hennes, {H. M.}",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "391--395",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chest radiography in the initial episode of bronchospasm in children

T2 - Can clinical variables predict pathologic findings?

AU - Walsh-Kelly, C. M.

AU - Kim, M. K.

AU - Hennes, H. M.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Study objective: To determine whether historical or clinical variables can accurately discriminate among children, experiencing a first episode of bronchospasm, with chest radiography findings that are normal, consistent with reactive airway disease (RAD), or pathologic. Methods: We assembled a prospective case series of patients in our tertiary, academic, pediatric emergency department. All patients aged newborn to 18 years presenting to the ED with their initial episode of wheezing were enrolled. Results: Six hundred thirty-three patients presented to the ED during the study period. Pathologic radiographic findings were identified in 39 (6.2%). Radiographs revealing normal findings and evidence of RAD were noted in 25.4% and 68%, respectively. No single variable accurately predicted all pathologic radiographs. Discriminant function analysis identified nine variables, which we combined into a model. The model failed to accurately discriminate among patients with radiographs revealing evidence of a pathologic condition, normal chest findings, and RAD. Conclusion: No clinical variables, isolated or combined into a model, accurately identify patients with pathologic radiography findings. Continued use of chest radiography as a diagnostic intervention in the initial episode of childhood bronchospasm is recommended.

AB - Study objective: To determine whether historical or clinical variables can accurately discriminate among children, experiencing a first episode of bronchospasm, with chest radiography findings that are normal, consistent with reactive airway disease (RAD), or pathologic. Methods: We assembled a prospective case series of patients in our tertiary, academic, pediatric emergency department. All patients aged newborn to 18 years presenting to the ED with their initial episode of wheezing were enrolled. Results: Six hundred thirty-three patients presented to the ED during the study period. Pathologic radiographic findings were identified in 39 (6.2%). Radiographs revealing normal findings and evidence of RAD were noted in 25.4% and 68%, respectively. No single variable accurately predicted all pathologic radiographs. Discriminant function analysis identified nine variables, which we combined into a model. The model failed to accurately discriminate among patients with radiographs revealing evidence of a pathologic condition, normal chest findings, and RAD. Conclusion: No clinical variables, isolated or combined into a model, accurately identify patients with pathologic radiography findings. Continued use of chest radiography as a diagnostic intervention in the initial episode of childhood bronchospasm is recommended.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029841659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029841659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 391

EP - 395

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 4

ER -