CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT OF ADULT BURIED PENIS SYNDROME

Timothy J J Tausch, Isamu Tachibana, Jordan Siegel, Ronald Hoxworth, Jeremy Scott, Allen F F Morey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND:: We present our experience with reconstructive strategies for men with various manifestations of A-BPS, and propose a comprehensive anatomic classification system and treatment algorithm based on both pathologic changes in the penile skin and involvement of neighboring abdominal and/or scrotal components. METHODS:: We reviewed all patients who underwent reconstruction of A-BPS at our referral center between 2007 and 2015. We stratified patients by location and severity of involved anatomic components. Abdominal and scrotal involvement was determined preoperatively, while viability of the penile skin was often determined intraoperatively. We reviewed procedures performed, demographics, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS:: Fifty-six patients underwent reconstruction of buried penis at our center from 2007-2015. All procedures began with a ventral penile release. If the uncovered penile skin was determined to be viable, a phalloplasty was performed by anchoring penoscrotal skin to the proximal shaft, and the ventral shaft skin defect was closed with scrotal flaps (VSSF). In more complex patients with circumferential non-viable penile skin, the penile skin was completely excised and replaced with an STSG. Complex patients with severe abdominal lipodystrophy required adjacent tissue transfer (ATT). For cases of genital lymphedema, the procedure involved complete excision of the lymphedematous tissue, and primary closure with or without a STSG, also often involving the scrotum. Our overall success rate was 88% (49/56), defined as resolution of symptoms without the need for additional procedures. CONCLUSIONS:: Successful correction of adult buried penis often necessitates an interdisciplinary, multi-modal approach, and excellent outcomes are possible with appropriate patient selection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Apr 29 2016

Fingerprint

Penis
Skin
Therapeutics
Lipodystrophy
Scrotum
Lymphedema
Patient Selection
Comorbidity
Referral and Consultation
Demography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT OF ADULT BURIED PENIS SYNDROME. / Tausch, Timothy J J; Tachibana, Isamu; Siegel, Jordan; Hoxworth, Ronald; Scott, Jeremy; Morey, Allen F F.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 29.04.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{91b7b508b1d44345ac97d7030ae1e5a5,
title = "CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT OF ADULT BURIED PENIS SYNDROME",
abstract = "BACKGROUND:: We present our experience with reconstructive strategies for men with various manifestations of A-BPS, and propose a comprehensive anatomic classification system and treatment algorithm based on both pathologic changes in the penile skin and involvement of neighboring abdominal and/or scrotal components. METHODS:: We reviewed all patients who underwent reconstruction of A-BPS at our referral center between 2007 and 2015. We stratified patients by location and severity of involved anatomic components. Abdominal and scrotal involvement was determined preoperatively, while viability of the penile skin was often determined intraoperatively. We reviewed procedures performed, demographics, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS:: Fifty-six patients underwent reconstruction of buried penis at our center from 2007-2015. All procedures began with a ventral penile release. If the uncovered penile skin was determined to be viable, a phalloplasty was performed by anchoring penoscrotal skin to the proximal shaft, and the ventral shaft skin defect was closed with scrotal flaps (VSSF). In more complex patients with circumferential non-viable penile skin, the penile skin was completely excised and replaced with an STSG. Complex patients with severe abdominal lipodystrophy required adjacent tissue transfer (ATT). For cases of genital lymphedema, the procedure involved complete excision of the lymphedematous tissue, and primary closure with or without a STSG, also often involving the scrotum. Our overall success rate was 88{\%} (49/56), defined as resolution of symptoms without the need for additional procedures. CONCLUSIONS:: Successful correction of adult buried penis often necessitates an interdisciplinary, multi-modal approach, and excellent outcomes are possible with appropriate patient selection.",
author = "Tausch, {Timothy J J} and Isamu Tachibana and Jordan Siegel and Ronald Hoxworth and Jeremy Scott and Morey, {Allen F F}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000002519",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT OF ADULT BURIED PENIS SYNDROME

AU - Tausch, Timothy J J

AU - Tachibana, Isamu

AU - Siegel, Jordan

AU - Hoxworth, Ronald

AU - Scott, Jeremy

AU - Morey, Allen F F

PY - 2016/4/29

Y1 - 2016/4/29

N2 - BACKGROUND:: We present our experience with reconstructive strategies for men with various manifestations of A-BPS, and propose a comprehensive anatomic classification system and treatment algorithm based on both pathologic changes in the penile skin and involvement of neighboring abdominal and/or scrotal components. METHODS:: We reviewed all patients who underwent reconstruction of A-BPS at our referral center between 2007 and 2015. We stratified patients by location and severity of involved anatomic components. Abdominal and scrotal involvement was determined preoperatively, while viability of the penile skin was often determined intraoperatively. We reviewed procedures performed, demographics, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS:: Fifty-six patients underwent reconstruction of buried penis at our center from 2007-2015. All procedures began with a ventral penile release. If the uncovered penile skin was determined to be viable, a phalloplasty was performed by anchoring penoscrotal skin to the proximal shaft, and the ventral shaft skin defect was closed with scrotal flaps (VSSF). In more complex patients with circumferential non-viable penile skin, the penile skin was completely excised and replaced with an STSG. Complex patients with severe abdominal lipodystrophy required adjacent tissue transfer (ATT). For cases of genital lymphedema, the procedure involved complete excision of the lymphedematous tissue, and primary closure with or without a STSG, also often involving the scrotum. Our overall success rate was 88% (49/56), defined as resolution of symptoms without the need for additional procedures. CONCLUSIONS:: Successful correction of adult buried penis often necessitates an interdisciplinary, multi-modal approach, and excellent outcomes are possible with appropriate patient selection.

AB - BACKGROUND:: We present our experience with reconstructive strategies for men with various manifestations of A-BPS, and propose a comprehensive anatomic classification system and treatment algorithm based on both pathologic changes in the penile skin and involvement of neighboring abdominal and/or scrotal components. METHODS:: We reviewed all patients who underwent reconstruction of A-BPS at our referral center between 2007 and 2015. We stratified patients by location and severity of involved anatomic components. Abdominal and scrotal involvement was determined preoperatively, while viability of the penile skin was often determined intraoperatively. We reviewed procedures performed, demographics, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS:: Fifty-six patients underwent reconstruction of buried penis at our center from 2007-2015. All procedures began with a ventral penile release. If the uncovered penile skin was determined to be viable, a phalloplasty was performed by anchoring penoscrotal skin to the proximal shaft, and the ventral shaft skin defect was closed with scrotal flaps (VSSF). In more complex patients with circumferential non-viable penile skin, the penile skin was completely excised and replaced with an STSG. Complex patients with severe abdominal lipodystrophy required adjacent tissue transfer (ATT). For cases of genital lymphedema, the procedure involved complete excision of the lymphedematous tissue, and primary closure with or without a STSG, also often involving the scrotum. Our overall success rate was 88% (49/56), defined as resolution of symptoms without the need for additional procedures. CONCLUSIONS:: Successful correction of adult buried penis often necessitates an interdisciplinary, multi-modal approach, and excellent outcomes are possible with appropriate patient selection.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965060515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965060515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002519

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002519

M3 - Article

C2 - 27152580

AN - SCOPUS:84965060515

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

ER -