TY - JOUR
T1 - Combining Serial and Parallel Functionality in Functional Lung Avoidance Radiation Therapy
AU - Vicente, Esther M.
AU - Modiri, Arezoo
AU - Kipritidis, John
AU - Yu, Kun Chang
AU - Sun, Kai
AU - Cammin, Jochen
AU - Gopal, Arun
AU - Xu, Jingzhu
AU - Mossahebi, Sina
AU - Hagan, Aaron
AU - Yan, Yulong
AU - Owen, Daniel Rockwell
AU - Mohindra, Pranshu
AU - Matuszak, Martha M.
AU - Timmerman, Robert D.
AU - Sawant, Amit
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/6/1
Y1 - 2022/6/1
N2 - Purpose: Functional lung avoidance (FLA) radiation therapy (RT) aims to minimize post-RT pulmonary toxicity by preferentially avoiding dose to high-functioning lung (HFL) regions. A common limitation is that FLA approaches do not consider the conducting architecture for gas exchange. We previously proposed the functionally weighted airway sparing (FWAS) method to spare airways connected to HFL regions, showing that it is possible to substantially reduce risk of radiation-induced airway injury. Here, we compare the performance of FLA and FWAS and propose a novel method combining both approaches. Methods: We used breath-hold computed tomography (BHCT) and simulation 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) from 12 lung stereotactic ablative radiation therapy patients. Four planning strategies were examined: (1) Conventional: no sparing other than clinical dose-volume constraints; (2) FLA: using a 4DCT-based ventilation map to delineate the HFL, plans were optimized to reduce mean dose and V13.50 in HFL; (3) FWAS: we autosegemented 11 to 13 generations of individual airways from each patient's BHCT and assigned priorities based on the relative contribution of each airway to total ventilation. We used these priorities in the optimization along with airway dose constraints, estimated as a function of airway diameter and 5% probability of collapse; and (4) FLA + FWAS: we combined information from the 2 strategies. We prioritized clinical dose constraints for organs at risk and planning target volume in all plans. We performed the evaluation in terms of ventilation preservation accounting for radiation-induced damage to both lung parenchyma and airways. Results: We observed average ventilation preservation for FLA, FWAS, and FLA + FWAS as 3%, 8.5%, and 14.5% higher, respectively, than for Conventional plans for patients with ventilation preservation in Conventional plans <90%. Generalized estimated equations showed that all improvements were statistically significant (P ≤ .036). We observed no clinically relevant improvements in outcomes of the sparing techniques in patients with ventilation preservation in Conventional plans ≥90%. Conclusions: These initial results suggest that it is crucial to consider the parallel and the serial nature of the lung to improve post-radiation therapy lung function and, consequently, quality of life for patients.
AB - Purpose: Functional lung avoidance (FLA) radiation therapy (RT) aims to minimize post-RT pulmonary toxicity by preferentially avoiding dose to high-functioning lung (HFL) regions. A common limitation is that FLA approaches do not consider the conducting architecture for gas exchange. We previously proposed the functionally weighted airway sparing (FWAS) method to spare airways connected to HFL regions, showing that it is possible to substantially reduce risk of radiation-induced airway injury. Here, we compare the performance of FLA and FWAS and propose a novel method combining both approaches. Methods: We used breath-hold computed tomography (BHCT) and simulation 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) from 12 lung stereotactic ablative radiation therapy patients. Four planning strategies were examined: (1) Conventional: no sparing other than clinical dose-volume constraints; (2) FLA: using a 4DCT-based ventilation map to delineate the HFL, plans were optimized to reduce mean dose and V13.50 in HFL; (3) FWAS: we autosegemented 11 to 13 generations of individual airways from each patient's BHCT and assigned priorities based on the relative contribution of each airway to total ventilation. We used these priorities in the optimization along with airway dose constraints, estimated as a function of airway diameter and 5% probability of collapse; and (4) FLA + FWAS: we combined information from the 2 strategies. We prioritized clinical dose constraints for organs at risk and planning target volume in all plans. We performed the evaluation in terms of ventilation preservation accounting for radiation-induced damage to both lung parenchyma and airways. Results: We observed average ventilation preservation for FLA, FWAS, and FLA + FWAS as 3%, 8.5%, and 14.5% higher, respectively, than for Conventional plans for patients with ventilation preservation in Conventional plans <90%. Generalized estimated equations showed that all improvements were statistically significant (P ≤ .036). We observed no clinically relevant improvements in outcomes of the sparing techniques in patients with ventilation preservation in Conventional plans ≥90%. Conclusions: These initial results suggest that it is crucial to consider the parallel and the serial nature of the lung to improve post-radiation therapy lung function and, consequently, quality of life for patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126059386&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126059386&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.01.046
DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.01.046
M3 - Article
C2 - 35279324
AN - SCOPUS:85126059386
SN - 0360-3016
VL - 113
SP - 456
EP - 468
JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
IS - 2
ER -