Communication About Advance Directives and End-of-Life Care Options Among Internal Medicine Residents

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Despite increasing awareness about the importance of discussing end-of-life (EOL) care options with terminally ill patients and families, many physicians remain uncomfortable with these discussions. Objective: The objective of the study was to examine perceptions of and comfort with EOL care discussions among a group of internal medicine residents and the extent to which comfort with these discussions has improved over time. Methods: In 2013, internal medicine residents at a large academic medical center were asked to participate in an on-line survey that assessed their attitudes and experiences with discussing EOL care with terminally-ill patients. These results were compared to data from a similar survey residents in the same program completed in 2006. Results: Eighty-three (50%) residents completed the 2013 survey. About half (52%) felt strongly that they were able to have open, honest discussions with patients and families, while 71% felt conflicted about whether CPR was in the patient’s best interest. About half (53%) felt strongly that it was okay for them to tell a patient/family member whether or not CPR was a good idea for them. Compared to 2006 respondents, the 2013 cohort felt they had more lectures about EOL communication, and had watched an attending have an EOL discussion more often. Conclusions: Modest improvements were made over time in trainees’ exposure to EOL discussions; however, many residents remain uncomfortable and conflicted with having EOL care discussions with their patients. More effective training approaches in EOL communication are needed to train the next generation of internists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)262-268
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 15 2015

Fingerprint

Advance Directives
Terminal Care
Internal Medicine
Communication
Terminally Ill
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Family Physicians
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • advance directives
  • hospice
  • internal medicine residents
  • medical education
  • palliative care
  • patient–physician communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{71df71688b0e4b87bfb7fa67a28db722,
title = "Communication About Advance Directives and End-of-Life Care Options Among Internal Medicine Residents",
abstract = "Background: Despite increasing awareness about the importance of discussing end-of-life (EOL) care options with terminally ill patients and families, many physicians remain uncomfortable with these discussions. Objective: The objective of the study was to examine perceptions of and comfort with EOL care discussions among a group of internal medicine residents and the extent to which comfort with these discussions has improved over time. Methods: In 2013, internal medicine residents at a large academic medical center were asked to participate in an on-line survey that assessed their attitudes and experiences with discussing EOL care with terminally-ill patients. These results were compared to data from a similar survey residents in the same program completed in 2006. Results: Eighty-three (50{\%}) residents completed the 2013 survey. About half (52{\%}) felt strongly that they were able to have open, honest discussions with patients and families, while 71{\%} felt conflicted about whether CPR was in the patient’s best interest. About half (53{\%}) felt strongly that it was okay for them to tell a patient/family member whether or not CPR was a good idea for them. Compared to 2006 respondents, the 2013 cohort felt they had more lectures about EOL communication, and had watched an attending have an EOL discussion more often. Conclusions: Modest improvements were made over time in trainees’ exposure to EOL discussions; however, many residents remain uncomfortable and conflicted with having EOL care discussions with their patients. More effective training approaches in EOL communication are needed to train the next generation of internists.",
keywords = "advance directives, hospice, internal medicine residents, medical education, palliative care, patient–physician communication",
author = "Rhodes, {Ramona L.} and Kate Tindall and Lei Xuan and Paulk, {M. Elizabeth} and Halm, {Ethan A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1177/1049909113517163",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "262--268",
journal = "American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine",
issn = "1049-9091",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communication About Advance Directives and End-of-Life Care Options Among Internal Medicine Residents

AU - Rhodes, Ramona L.

AU - Tindall, Kate

AU - Xuan, Lei

AU - Paulk, M. Elizabeth

AU - Halm, Ethan A.

PY - 2015/5/15

Y1 - 2015/5/15

N2 - Background: Despite increasing awareness about the importance of discussing end-of-life (EOL) care options with terminally ill patients and families, many physicians remain uncomfortable with these discussions. Objective: The objective of the study was to examine perceptions of and comfort with EOL care discussions among a group of internal medicine residents and the extent to which comfort with these discussions has improved over time. Methods: In 2013, internal medicine residents at a large academic medical center were asked to participate in an on-line survey that assessed their attitudes and experiences with discussing EOL care with terminally-ill patients. These results were compared to data from a similar survey residents in the same program completed in 2006. Results: Eighty-three (50%) residents completed the 2013 survey. About half (52%) felt strongly that they were able to have open, honest discussions with patients and families, while 71% felt conflicted about whether CPR was in the patient’s best interest. About half (53%) felt strongly that it was okay for them to tell a patient/family member whether or not CPR was a good idea for them. Compared to 2006 respondents, the 2013 cohort felt they had more lectures about EOL communication, and had watched an attending have an EOL discussion more often. Conclusions: Modest improvements were made over time in trainees’ exposure to EOL discussions; however, many residents remain uncomfortable and conflicted with having EOL care discussions with their patients. More effective training approaches in EOL communication are needed to train the next generation of internists.

AB - Background: Despite increasing awareness about the importance of discussing end-of-life (EOL) care options with terminally ill patients and families, many physicians remain uncomfortable with these discussions. Objective: The objective of the study was to examine perceptions of and comfort with EOL care discussions among a group of internal medicine residents and the extent to which comfort with these discussions has improved over time. Methods: In 2013, internal medicine residents at a large academic medical center were asked to participate in an on-line survey that assessed their attitudes and experiences with discussing EOL care with terminally-ill patients. These results were compared to data from a similar survey residents in the same program completed in 2006. Results: Eighty-three (50%) residents completed the 2013 survey. About half (52%) felt strongly that they were able to have open, honest discussions with patients and families, while 71% felt conflicted about whether CPR was in the patient’s best interest. About half (53%) felt strongly that it was okay for them to tell a patient/family member whether or not CPR was a good idea for them. Compared to 2006 respondents, the 2013 cohort felt they had more lectures about EOL communication, and had watched an attending have an EOL discussion more often. Conclusions: Modest improvements were made over time in trainees’ exposure to EOL discussions; however, many residents remain uncomfortable and conflicted with having EOL care discussions with their patients. More effective training approaches in EOL communication are needed to train the next generation of internists.

KW - advance directives

KW - hospice

KW - internal medicine residents

KW - medical education

KW - palliative care

KW - patient–physician communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927557707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927557707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1049909113517163

DO - 10.1177/1049909113517163

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 262

EP - 268

JO - American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine

JF - American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine

SN - 1049-9091

IS - 3

ER -