Comparison between in-phase and opposed-phase T1-weighted breath-hold FLASH sequences for hepatic imaging

Neu M. Rofsky, Jeffrey C. Weinreb, Michael M. Ambrosino, Julian Safir, Glenn Krinsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Our goal was to compare in-phase (IP) and opposed-phase (OP) sequences for GRE breath-hold hepatic imaging. Method: Non-contrast-enhanced IP and OP GRE breath-hold images were obtained in 104 consecutive patients referred for abdominal MRI at 1.0 T. For both sequences, the TR, FA, matrix, FOV, slice thickness, interslice gap, and measurements were kept constant. Images were compared quantitatively [liver/spleen and liver/lesion signal difference/noise ratio, (SD/N)] and qualitatively (artifacts, lesion detection and conspicuity, and intrahepatic anatomy). Results: There was no statistically significant difference when comparing IP and OP sequences for liver/spleen and liver/lesion SD/N or for the qualitative parameters. In patients with fatty infiltration, the OP sequences yielded substantially lower values for liver/spleen and liver/lesion SD/N (0.9 and -1.2, respectively) than the IP sequences (20 and 17, respectively). Furthermore, in several cases with fatty infiltration, many more lesions were identified using IP images. Conclusion: The use of IP and OP GRE sequences provides complementary diagnostic information. Focal liver lesions may be obscured in the setting of fatty infiltration if only OP sequences are employed. A complete assessment of the liver with MR should include both IP and OP imaging.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)230-235
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Liver
Noise
Spleen
Artifacts
Anatomy

Keywords

  • Chemical shift imaging
  • Liver
  • Liver, cirrhosis
  • Liver, neoplasms
  • Magnetic resonance imaging, rapid
  • Magnetic resonance imaging, techniques

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Comparison between in-phase and opposed-phase T1-weighted breath-hold FLASH sequences for hepatic imaging. / Rofsky, Neu M.; Weinreb, Jeffrey C.; Ambrosino, Michael M.; Safir, Julian; Krinsky, Glenn.

In: Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1996, p. 230-235.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rofsky, Neu M. ; Weinreb, Jeffrey C. ; Ambrosino, Michael M. ; Safir, Julian ; Krinsky, Glenn. / Comparison between in-phase and opposed-phase T1-weighted breath-hold FLASH sequences for hepatic imaging. In: Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 1996 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 230-235.
@article{0891b8a1a39a4093a8533a0c5286a27b,
title = "Comparison between in-phase and opposed-phase T1-weighted breath-hold FLASH sequences for hepatic imaging",
abstract = "Purpose: Our goal was to compare in-phase (IP) and opposed-phase (OP) sequences for GRE breath-hold hepatic imaging. Method: Non-contrast-enhanced IP and OP GRE breath-hold images were obtained in 104 consecutive patients referred for abdominal MRI at 1.0 T. For both sequences, the TR, FA, matrix, FOV, slice thickness, interslice gap, and measurements were kept constant. Images were compared quantitatively [liver/spleen and liver/lesion signal difference/noise ratio, (SD/N)] and qualitatively (artifacts, lesion detection and conspicuity, and intrahepatic anatomy). Results: There was no statistically significant difference when comparing IP and OP sequences for liver/spleen and liver/lesion SD/N or for the qualitative parameters. In patients with fatty infiltration, the OP sequences yielded substantially lower values for liver/spleen and liver/lesion SD/N (0.9 and -1.2, respectively) than the IP sequences (20 and 17, respectively). Furthermore, in several cases with fatty infiltration, many more lesions were identified using IP images. Conclusion: The use of IP and OP GRE sequences provides complementary diagnostic information. Focal liver lesions may be obscured in the setting of fatty infiltration if only OP sequences are employed. A complete assessment of the liver with MR should include both IP and OP imaging.",
keywords = "Chemical shift imaging, Liver, Liver, cirrhosis, Liver, neoplasms, Magnetic resonance imaging, rapid, Magnetic resonance imaging, techniques",
author = "Rofsky, {Neu M.} and Weinreb, {Jeffrey C.} and Ambrosino, {Michael M.} and Julian Safir and Glenn Krinsky",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1097/00004728-199603000-00012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "230--235",
journal = "Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography",
issn = "0363-8715",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison between in-phase and opposed-phase T1-weighted breath-hold FLASH sequences for hepatic imaging

AU - Rofsky, Neu M.

AU - Weinreb, Jeffrey C.

AU - Ambrosino, Michael M.

AU - Safir, Julian

AU - Krinsky, Glenn

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Purpose: Our goal was to compare in-phase (IP) and opposed-phase (OP) sequences for GRE breath-hold hepatic imaging. Method: Non-contrast-enhanced IP and OP GRE breath-hold images were obtained in 104 consecutive patients referred for abdominal MRI at 1.0 T. For both sequences, the TR, FA, matrix, FOV, slice thickness, interslice gap, and measurements were kept constant. Images were compared quantitatively [liver/spleen and liver/lesion signal difference/noise ratio, (SD/N)] and qualitatively (artifacts, lesion detection and conspicuity, and intrahepatic anatomy). Results: There was no statistically significant difference when comparing IP and OP sequences for liver/spleen and liver/lesion SD/N or for the qualitative parameters. In patients with fatty infiltration, the OP sequences yielded substantially lower values for liver/spleen and liver/lesion SD/N (0.9 and -1.2, respectively) than the IP sequences (20 and 17, respectively). Furthermore, in several cases with fatty infiltration, many more lesions were identified using IP images. Conclusion: The use of IP and OP GRE sequences provides complementary diagnostic information. Focal liver lesions may be obscured in the setting of fatty infiltration if only OP sequences are employed. A complete assessment of the liver with MR should include both IP and OP imaging.

AB - Purpose: Our goal was to compare in-phase (IP) and opposed-phase (OP) sequences for GRE breath-hold hepatic imaging. Method: Non-contrast-enhanced IP and OP GRE breath-hold images were obtained in 104 consecutive patients referred for abdominal MRI at 1.0 T. For both sequences, the TR, FA, matrix, FOV, slice thickness, interslice gap, and measurements were kept constant. Images were compared quantitatively [liver/spleen and liver/lesion signal difference/noise ratio, (SD/N)] and qualitatively (artifacts, lesion detection and conspicuity, and intrahepatic anatomy). Results: There was no statistically significant difference when comparing IP and OP sequences for liver/spleen and liver/lesion SD/N or for the qualitative parameters. In patients with fatty infiltration, the OP sequences yielded substantially lower values for liver/spleen and liver/lesion SD/N (0.9 and -1.2, respectively) than the IP sequences (20 and 17, respectively). Furthermore, in several cases with fatty infiltration, many more lesions were identified using IP images. Conclusion: The use of IP and OP GRE sequences provides complementary diagnostic information. Focal liver lesions may be obscured in the setting of fatty infiltration if only OP sequences are employed. A complete assessment of the liver with MR should include both IP and OP imaging.

KW - Chemical shift imaging

KW - Liver

KW - Liver, cirrhosis

KW - Liver, neoplasms

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging, rapid

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging, techniques

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029872618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029872618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00004728-199603000-00012

DO - 10.1097/00004728-199603000-00012

M3 - Article

C2 - 8606229

AN - SCOPUS:0029872618

VL - 20

SP - 230

EP - 235

JO - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

JF - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

SN - 0363-8715

IS - 2

ER -