Congenital fibular deficiency: A review of thirty years' experience at one institution and a proposed classification system based on clinical deformity

John G. Birch, Todd L. Lincoln, Philip W. Mack, Craig M. Birch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Congenital longitudinal deficiency of the fibula is the most common lower extremity congenital deficiency, with a broad spectrum of severity and subsequent reconstructive treatment. Published classification schemes do not accurately predict reconstructive treatment currently in practice. Methods: We reviewed all medical records of patients with a dominant deformity of congenital fibular deficiency who were managed at our institution between 1971 and 2005. We assessed the impact of limb-length inequality, foot deformity, bilateral extremity involvement, and extent of fibular preservation on the treatment of the limb deficiency. Results: One hundred and four patients (including twenty-two with bilateral congenital fibular deficiency) with 126 affected extremities had adequate radiographs to be included in the study. Femoral shortening was noted in seventy (85.4%) of eighty-two patients with unilateral limb involvement. Limb-length discrepancy prior to any treatment remained proportional in forty-seven (82.5%) of fifty-seven patients during an average duration of follow-up of ten years and ten months (range, two years to fifteen years and six months). Limb salvage with foot preservation was deemed feasible in thirty-eight (97.4%) of thirty-nine five-rayed feet, thirty (81.1%) of thirty-seven four-rayed feet, twenty (48.8%) of forty-one three-rayed feet, and one of nine feet having fewer than three rays. Twenty-two (41.5%) of fifty-three limbs with an absent or vestigial fibula were not treated with amputation. Of the twenty-two patients with bilateral fibular deficiency, twelve (54.5%) had preservation of both feet, three (13.6%) had unilateral amputation, and seven (31.8%) had bilateral amputation. Conclusions: We propose a simplified classification for congenital fibular deficiency based on the clinical status of the foot and the magnitude of limb shortening as a percentage of the contralateral limb on radiographs. This classification may be effectively applied in infancy to allow the physician and family to anticipate the extent of deformity at maturity and to estimate the amount of treatment required to reconstruct this limb deformity. This system more accurately predicted the management of patients with fibular deficiency who were managed at our institution over the past three decades. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1144-1151
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A
Volume93
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2011

Fingerprint

Extremities
Foot
Amputation
Fibula
Therapeutics
Foot Deformities
Limb Salvage
Family Physicians
Thigh
Medical Records
Lower Extremity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Congenital fibular deficiency : A review of thirty years' experience at one institution and a proposed classification system based on clinical deformity. / Birch, John G.; Lincoln, Todd L.; Mack, Philip W.; Birch, Craig M.

In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, Vol. 93, No. 12, 15.06.2011, p. 1144-1151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6b857e66108a414ca5dcf7b53444dc92,
title = "Congenital fibular deficiency: A review of thirty years' experience at one institution and a proposed classification system based on clinical deformity",
abstract = "Background: Congenital longitudinal deficiency of the fibula is the most common lower extremity congenital deficiency, with a broad spectrum of severity and subsequent reconstructive treatment. Published classification schemes do not accurately predict reconstructive treatment currently in practice. Methods: We reviewed all medical records of patients with a dominant deformity of congenital fibular deficiency who were managed at our institution between 1971 and 2005. We assessed the impact of limb-length inequality, foot deformity, bilateral extremity involvement, and extent of fibular preservation on the treatment of the limb deficiency. Results: One hundred and four patients (including twenty-two with bilateral congenital fibular deficiency) with 126 affected extremities had adequate radiographs to be included in the study. Femoral shortening was noted in seventy (85.4{\%}) of eighty-two patients with unilateral limb involvement. Limb-length discrepancy prior to any treatment remained proportional in forty-seven (82.5{\%}) of fifty-seven patients during an average duration of follow-up of ten years and ten months (range, two years to fifteen years and six months). Limb salvage with foot preservation was deemed feasible in thirty-eight (97.4{\%}) of thirty-nine five-rayed feet, thirty (81.1{\%}) of thirty-seven four-rayed feet, twenty (48.8{\%}) of forty-one three-rayed feet, and one of nine feet having fewer than three rays. Twenty-two (41.5{\%}) of fifty-three limbs with an absent or vestigial fibula were not treated with amputation. Of the twenty-two patients with bilateral fibular deficiency, twelve (54.5{\%}) had preservation of both feet, three (13.6{\%}) had unilateral amputation, and seven (31.8{\%}) had bilateral amputation. Conclusions: We propose a simplified classification for congenital fibular deficiency based on the clinical status of the foot and the magnitude of limb shortening as a percentage of the contralateral limb on radiographs. This classification may be effectively applied in infancy to allow the physician and family to anticipate the extent of deformity at maturity and to estimate the amount of treatment required to reconstruct this limb deformity. This system more accurately predicted the management of patients with fibular deficiency who were managed at our institution over the past three decades. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.",
author = "Birch, {John G.} and Lincoln, {Todd L.} and Mack, {Philip W.} and Birch, {Craig M.}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "15",
doi = "10.2106/JBJS.J.00683",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "1144--1151",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume",
issn = "0021-9355",
publisher = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Congenital fibular deficiency

T2 - A review of thirty years' experience at one institution and a proposed classification system based on clinical deformity

AU - Birch, John G.

AU - Lincoln, Todd L.

AU - Mack, Philip W.

AU - Birch, Craig M.

PY - 2011/6/15

Y1 - 2011/6/15

N2 - Background: Congenital longitudinal deficiency of the fibula is the most common lower extremity congenital deficiency, with a broad spectrum of severity and subsequent reconstructive treatment. Published classification schemes do not accurately predict reconstructive treatment currently in practice. Methods: We reviewed all medical records of patients with a dominant deformity of congenital fibular deficiency who were managed at our institution between 1971 and 2005. We assessed the impact of limb-length inequality, foot deformity, bilateral extremity involvement, and extent of fibular preservation on the treatment of the limb deficiency. Results: One hundred and four patients (including twenty-two with bilateral congenital fibular deficiency) with 126 affected extremities had adequate radiographs to be included in the study. Femoral shortening was noted in seventy (85.4%) of eighty-two patients with unilateral limb involvement. Limb-length discrepancy prior to any treatment remained proportional in forty-seven (82.5%) of fifty-seven patients during an average duration of follow-up of ten years and ten months (range, two years to fifteen years and six months). Limb salvage with foot preservation was deemed feasible in thirty-eight (97.4%) of thirty-nine five-rayed feet, thirty (81.1%) of thirty-seven four-rayed feet, twenty (48.8%) of forty-one three-rayed feet, and one of nine feet having fewer than three rays. Twenty-two (41.5%) of fifty-three limbs with an absent or vestigial fibula were not treated with amputation. Of the twenty-two patients with bilateral fibular deficiency, twelve (54.5%) had preservation of both feet, three (13.6%) had unilateral amputation, and seven (31.8%) had bilateral amputation. Conclusions: We propose a simplified classification for congenital fibular deficiency based on the clinical status of the foot and the magnitude of limb shortening as a percentage of the contralateral limb on radiographs. This classification may be effectively applied in infancy to allow the physician and family to anticipate the extent of deformity at maturity and to estimate the amount of treatment required to reconstruct this limb deformity. This system more accurately predicted the management of patients with fibular deficiency who were managed at our institution over the past three decades. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

AB - Background: Congenital longitudinal deficiency of the fibula is the most common lower extremity congenital deficiency, with a broad spectrum of severity and subsequent reconstructive treatment. Published classification schemes do not accurately predict reconstructive treatment currently in practice. Methods: We reviewed all medical records of patients with a dominant deformity of congenital fibular deficiency who were managed at our institution between 1971 and 2005. We assessed the impact of limb-length inequality, foot deformity, bilateral extremity involvement, and extent of fibular preservation on the treatment of the limb deficiency. Results: One hundred and four patients (including twenty-two with bilateral congenital fibular deficiency) with 126 affected extremities had adequate radiographs to be included in the study. Femoral shortening was noted in seventy (85.4%) of eighty-two patients with unilateral limb involvement. Limb-length discrepancy prior to any treatment remained proportional in forty-seven (82.5%) of fifty-seven patients during an average duration of follow-up of ten years and ten months (range, two years to fifteen years and six months). Limb salvage with foot preservation was deemed feasible in thirty-eight (97.4%) of thirty-nine five-rayed feet, thirty (81.1%) of thirty-seven four-rayed feet, twenty (48.8%) of forty-one three-rayed feet, and one of nine feet having fewer than three rays. Twenty-two (41.5%) of fifty-three limbs with an absent or vestigial fibula were not treated with amputation. Of the twenty-two patients with bilateral fibular deficiency, twelve (54.5%) had preservation of both feet, three (13.6%) had unilateral amputation, and seven (31.8%) had bilateral amputation. Conclusions: We propose a simplified classification for congenital fibular deficiency based on the clinical status of the foot and the magnitude of limb shortening as a percentage of the contralateral limb on radiographs. This classification may be effectively applied in infancy to allow the physician and family to anticipate the extent of deformity at maturity and to estimate the amount of treatment required to reconstruct this limb deformity. This system more accurately predicted the management of patients with fibular deficiency who were managed at our institution over the past three decades. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79961068490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79961068490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2106/JBJS.J.00683

DO - 10.2106/JBJS.J.00683

M3 - Article

C2 - 21776551

AN - SCOPUS:79961068490

VL - 93

SP - 1144

EP - 1151

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

SN - 0021-9355

IS - 12

ER -