Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to see how coronary magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) compared to echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery origins and to compare CMRA measurements for coronary dimensions in children with published echocardiographic reference values. Methods: Enrolled patients underwent dual cardiac phase CMRA and echocardiography under the same anesthetic. Echocardiographic measurements of the right coronary artery (RCA), left anterior descending (LAD) and left main (LM) were made. CMRA dimensions were assessed manually at the same points as the echocardiographic measurements. The number of proximal LAD branches imaged was also recorded in order to give an estimate of distal coronary tree visualization. Results: Fifty patients (24 boys, mean age 4.0 years (range 18 days to 18 years)) underwent dual-phase CMRA. Coronary origins were identified in 47/50 cases for CMRA (remaining 3 were infants aged 3, 9 and 11 months). In comparison, origins were identified in 41/50 cases for echo (remaining were all older children). CMRA performed better than echocardiography in terms of distal visualization of the coronary tree (median 1 LAD branch vs. median 0; p = 0.001). Bland-Altman plots show poor agreement between echocardiography and CMRA for coronary measurements. CMRA measurements did vary according to cardiac phase (systolic mean 1.90, s.d. 0.05 mm vs. diastolic mean 1.84, s.d. 0.05 mm; p = 0.002). Conclusions: Dual-phase CMRA has an excellent (94 %) success rate for the detection of coronary origins in children. Newborn infants remain challenging and echocardiography remains the accepted imaging modality for this age group. Echocardiographic reference ranges are not applicable to CMRA measurements as agreement was poor between modalities. Future coronary reference values, using any imaging modality, should quote the phase in which it was measured.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 48 |
| Journal | BMC Medical Imaging |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 27 2015 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Adolescent
- Child
- Coronary vessels
- Echocardiography
- Infant
- Magnetic resonance imaging
- Newborn
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Cite this
Coronary artery size and origin imaging in children : A comparative study of MRI and trans-thoracic echocardiography. / Hussain, Tarique; Mathur, Sujeev; Peel, Sarah A.; Valverde, Israel; Bilska, Karolina; Henningsson, Markus; Botnar, Rene M.; Simpson, John; Greil, Gerald F.
In: BMC Medical Imaging, Vol. 15, No. 1, 48, 27.10.2015.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Coronary artery size and origin imaging in children
T2 - A comparative study of MRI and trans-thoracic echocardiography
AU - Hussain, Tarique
AU - Mathur, Sujeev
AU - Peel, Sarah A.
AU - Valverde, Israel
AU - Bilska, Karolina
AU - Henningsson, Markus
AU - Botnar, Rene M.
AU - Simpson, John
AU - Greil, Gerald F.
PY - 2015/10/27
Y1 - 2015/10/27
N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to see how coronary magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) compared to echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery origins and to compare CMRA measurements for coronary dimensions in children with published echocardiographic reference values. Methods: Enrolled patients underwent dual cardiac phase CMRA and echocardiography under the same anesthetic. Echocardiographic measurements of the right coronary artery (RCA), left anterior descending (LAD) and left main (LM) were made. CMRA dimensions were assessed manually at the same points as the echocardiographic measurements. The number of proximal LAD branches imaged was also recorded in order to give an estimate of distal coronary tree visualization. Results: Fifty patients (24 boys, mean age 4.0 years (range 18 days to 18 years)) underwent dual-phase CMRA. Coronary origins were identified in 47/50 cases for CMRA (remaining 3 were infants aged 3, 9 and 11 months). In comparison, origins were identified in 41/50 cases for echo (remaining were all older children). CMRA performed better than echocardiography in terms of distal visualization of the coronary tree (median 1 LAD branch vs. median 0; p = 0.001). Bland-Altman plots show poor agreement between echocardiography and CMRA for coronary measurements. CMRA measurements did vary according to cardiac phase (systolic mean 1.90, s.d. 0.05 mm vs. diastolic mean 1.84, s.d. 0.05 mm; p = 0.002). Conclusions: Dual-phase CMRA has an excellent (94 %) success rate for the detection of coronary origins in children. Newborn infants remain challenging and echocardiography remains the accepted imaging modality for this age group. Echocardiographic reference ranges are not applicable to CMRA measurements as agreement was poor between modalities. Future coronary reference values, using any imaging modality, should quote the phase in which it was measured.
AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to see how coronary magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) compared to echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery origins and to compare CMRA measurements for coronary dimensions in children with published echocardiographic reference values. Methods: Enrolled patients underwent dual cardiac phase CMRA and echocardiography under the same anesthetic. Echocardiographic measurements of the right coronary artery (RCA), left anterior descending (LAD) and left main (LM) were made. CMRA dimensions were assessed manually at the same points as the echocardiographic measurements. The number of proximal LAD branches imaged was also recorded in order to give an estimate of distal coronary tree visualization. Results: Fifty patients (24 boys, mean age 4.0 years (range 18 days to 18 years)) underwent dual-phase CMRA. Coronary origins were identified in 47/50 cases for CMRA (remaining 3 were infants aged 3, 9 and 11 months). In comparison, origins were identified in 41/50 cases for echo (remaining were all older children). CMRA performed better than echocardiography in terms of distal visualization of the coronary tree (median 1 LAD branch vs. median 0; p = 0.001). Bland-Altman plots show poor agreement between echocardiography and CMRA for coronary measurements. CMRA measurements did vary according to cardiac phase (systolic mean 1.90, s.d. 0.05 mm vs. diastolic mean 1.84, s.d. 0.05 mm; p = 0.002). Conclusions: Dual-phase CMRA has an excellent (94 %) success rate for the detection of coronary origins in children. Newborn infants remain challenging and echocardiography remains the accepted imaging modality for this age group. Echocardiographic reference ranges are not applicable to CMRA measurements as agreement was poor between modalities. Future coronary reference values, using any imaging modality, should quote the phase in which it was measured.
KW - Adolescent
KW - Child
KW - Coronary vessels
KW - Echocardiography
KW - Infant
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Newborn
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945547925&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945547925&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12880-015-0095-7
DO - 10.1186/s12880-015-0095-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 26502883
AN - SCOPUS:84945547925
VL - 15
JO - BMC Medical Imaging
JF - BMC Medical Imaging
SN - 1471-2342
IS - 1
M1 - 48
ER -