Corrigendum to “Thiol-ene Michael-type formation of gelatin/poly(ethylene glycol) biomatrices for three-dimensional mesenchymal stromal/stem cell administration to cutaneous wounds” (Acta Biomater. (2013) 9(11) 8802–8814) (S174270611300305X) (10.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.021))

Kedi Xu, David Antonio Cantu, Yao Fu, Jaehyup Kim, Xiaoxiang Zheng, Peiman Hematti, W. John Kao

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

The authors regret to state that the y-axis label of Figure 5B is incorrectly labelled in the manuscript and should be in micrometers, (micro-m). The first “m” in “mm” should be a Greek “μ”. As such the unit in the text in Sec 3.4 p. 8806 should read “Accelerated re-epithelialization was statistically greater for the gelatin/PEG hydrogel (6.17 ± 2 μm, p = 0.011) and the MSC–gelatin/PEG biomatrix (6.59 ± 2 μm, p = 0.0041) treatments compared with the sham wound…”. The authors apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalActa Biomaterialia
Volume58
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cutaneous Administration
Re-Epithelialization
Ethylene Glycol
Manuscripts
Hydrogel
Gelatin
Stem cells
Mesenchymal Stromal Cells
Sulfhydryl Compounds
Polyethylene glycols
Emotions
Wounds and Injuries
Hydrogels
Labels
Therapeutics
corrigendum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology
  • Biomaterials
  • Biochemistry
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Molecular Biology

Cite this

@article{3ee09782a4b34ad0bfdc2468f6de7f44,
title = "Corrigendum to “Thiol-ene Michael-type formation of gelatin/poly(ethylene glycol) biomatrices for three-dimensional mesenchymal stromal/stem cell administration to cutaneous wounds” (Acta Biomater. (2013) 9(11) 8802–8814) (S174270611300305X) (10.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.021))",
abstract = "The authors regret to state that the y-axis label of Figure 5B is incorrectly labelled in the manuscript and should be in micrometers, (micro-m). The first “m” in “mm” should be a Greek “μ”. As such the unit in the text in Sec 3.4 p. 8806 should read “Accelerated re-epithelialization was statistically greater for the gelatin/PEG hydrogel (6.17 ± 2 μm, p = 0.011) and the MSC–gelatin/PEG biomatrix (6.59 ± 2 μm, p = 0.0041) treatments compared with the sham wound…”. The authors apologise for any inconvenience caused.",
author = "Kedi Xu and Cantu, {David Antonio} and Yao Fu and Jaehyup Kim and Xiaoxiang Zheng and Peiman Hematti and Kao, {W. John}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
journal = "Acta Biomaterialia",
issn = "1742-7061",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum to “Thiol-ene Michael-type formation of gelatin/poly(ethylene glycol) biomatrices for three-dimensional mesenchymal stromal/stem cell administration to cutaneous wounds” (Acta Biomater. (2013) 9(11) 8802–8814) (S174270611300305X) (10.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.021))

AU - Xu, Kedi

AU - Cantu, David Antonio

AU - Fu, Yao

AU - Kim, Jaehyup

AU - Zheng, Xiaoxiang

AU - Hematti, Peiman

AU - Kao, W. John

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - The authors regret to state that the y-axis label of Figure 5B is incorrectly labelled in the manuscript and should be in micrometers, (micro-m). The first “m” in “mm” should be a Greek “μ”. As such the unit in the text in Sec 3.4 p. 8806 should read “Accelerated re-epithelialization was statistically greater for the gelatin/PEG hydrogel (6.17 ± 2 μm, p = 0.011) and the MSC–gelatin/PEG biomatrix (6.59 ± 2 μm, p = 0.0041) treatments compared with the sham wound…”. The authors apologise for any inconvenience caused.

AB - The authors regret to state that the y-axis label of Figure 5B is incorrectly labelled in the manuscript and should be in micrometers, (micro-m). The first “m” in “mm” should be a Greek “μ”. As such the unit in the text in Sec 3.4 p. 8806 should read “Accelerated re-epithelialization was statistically greater for the gelatin/PEG hydrogel (6.17 ± 2 μm, p = 0.011) and the MSC–gelatin/PEG biomatrix (6.59 ± 2 μm, p = 0.0041) treatments compared with the sham wound…”. The authors apologise for any inconvenience caused.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021920503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021920503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.022

DO - 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.022

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 28698026

AN - SCOPUS:85021920503

VL - 58

JO - Acta Biomaterialia

JF - Acta Biomaterialia

SN - 1742-7061

ER -