Cost-effective treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

A decision tree analysis

Matthew T. Gettman, Yair Lotan, Claus G. Roerhborn, Jeffrey A Cadeddu, Margaret S Pearle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We determined the optimal treatment for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction based on cost using a decision tree model. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search for articles addressing surgical correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction was performed and data were abstracted on operative time, hospital stay, complications and success rate. The overall cost and individual cost centers at our institution for antegrade endopyelotomy, retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy, Acucise (Applied Medical Resources, Laguna Hills, California) endopyelotomy, laparoscopic pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty were compared. A decision tree model estimated the cost of treatment and followup for each modality using commercially available software. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of individual treatment variables on overall cost. Results: Based on cost center review retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy was the least costly procedure ($2,891). In the decision tree model the rank order of overall treatment costs was: retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy ($3,842), Acucise endopyelotomy ($4,427), antegrade endopyelotomy ($5,297), laparoscopic pyeloplasty ($7,026) and open pyeloplasty ($7,119). Despite various hospital stay, operative time, equipment cost and success rate data 1-way sensitivity analysis revealed that antegrade endopyelotomy, laparoscopic pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty were never cost effective compared with retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy or Acucise endopyelotomy, while 2-way sensitivity analysis favored retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy. Conclusions: Primary cost variables for ureteropelvic junction obstruction treatments include operative time, hospital stay, equipment cost and success rate. Decision tree analysis showed that retrograde ureteroscopic or Acucise endopyelotomy is the most cost-effective treatment modality at our institution. However, cost is only 1 of a number of factors that are considered when deciding on an optimal course of treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)228-232
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume169
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Decision Trees
Decision Support Techniques
Health Care Costs
Costs and Cost Analysis
Operative Time
Length of Stay
Hospital Equipment and Supplies
Therapeutics
Software
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Cost-benefit analysis
  • Decision trees
  • Kidney
  • Ureter
  • Ureteral obstruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Cost-effective treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction : A decision tree analysis. / Gettman, Matthew T.; Lotan, Yair; Roerhborn, Claus G.; Cadeddu, Jeffrey A; Pearle, Margaret S.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 169, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 228-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a234dec17a9944d3b0aa9f2cd0b10e36,
title = "Cost-effective treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A decision tree analysis",
abstract = "Purpose: We determined the optimal treatment for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction based on cost using a decision tree model. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search for articles addressing surgical correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction was performed and data were abstracted on operative time, hospital stay, complications and success rate. The overall cost and individual cost centers at our institution for antegrade endopyelotomy, retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy, Acucise (Applied Medical Resources, Laguna Hills, California) endopyelotomy, laparoscopic pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty were compared. A decision tree model estimated the cost of treatment and followup for each modality using commercially available software. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of individual treatment variables on overall cost. Results: Based on cost center review retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy was the least costly procedure ($2,891). In the decision tree model the rank order of overall treatment costs was: retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy ($3,842), Acucise endopyelotomy ($4,427), antegrade endopyelotomy ($5,297), laparoscopic pyeloplasty ($7,026) and open pyeloplasty ($7,119). Despite various hospital stay, operative time, equipment cost and success rate data 1-way sensitivity analysis revealed that antegrade endopyelotomy, laparoscopic pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty were never cost effective compared with retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy or Acucise endopyelotomy, while 2-way sensitivity analysis favored retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy. Conclusions: Primary cost variables for ureteropelvic junction obstruction treatments include operative time, hospital stay, equipment cost and success rate. Decision tree analysis showed that retrograde ureteroscopic or Acucise endopyelotomy is the most cost-effective treatment modality at our institution. However, cost is only 1 of a number of factors that are considered when deciding on an optimal course of treatment.",
keywords = "Cost-benefit analysis, Decision trees, Kidney, Ureter, Ureteral obstruction",
author = "Gettman, {Matthew T.} and Yair Lotan and Roerhborn, {Claus G.} and Cadeddu, {Jeffrey A} and Pearle, {Margaret S}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "169",
pages = "228--232",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effective treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

T2 - A decision tree analysis

AU - Gettman, Matthew T.

AU - Lotan, Yair

AU - Roerhborn, Claus G.

AU - Cadeddu, Jeffrey A

AU - Pearle, Margaret S

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Purpose: We determined the optimal treatment for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction based on cost using a decision tree model. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search for articles addressing surgical correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction was performed and data were abstracted on operative time, hospital stay, complications and success rate. The overall cost and individual cost centers at our institution for antegrade endopyelotomy, retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy, Acucise (Applied Medical Resources, Laguna Hills, California) endopyelotomy, laparoscopic pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty were compared. A decision tree model estimated the cost of treatment and followup for each modality using commercially available software. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of individual treatment variables on overall cost. Results: Based on cost center review retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy was the least costly procedure ($2,891). In the decision tree model the rank order of overall treatment costs was: retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy ($3,842), Acucise endopyelotomy ($4,427), antegrade endopyelotomy ($5,297), laparoscopic pyeloplasty ($7,026) and open pyeloplasty ($7,119). Despite various hospital stay, operative time, equipment cost and success rate data 1-way sensitivity analysis revealed that antegrade endopyelotomy, laparoscopic pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty were never cost effective compared with retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy or Acucise endopyelotomy, while 2-way sensitivity analysis favored retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy. Conclusions: Primary cost variables for ureteropelvic junction obstruction treatments include operative time, hospital stay, equipment cost and success rate. Decision tree analysis showed that retrograde ureteroscopic or Acucise endopyelotomy is the most cost-effective treatment modality at our institution. However, cost is only 1 of a number of factors that are considered when deciding on an optimal course of treatment.

AB - Purpose: We determined the optimal treatment for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction based on cost using a decision tree model. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search for articles addressing surgical correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction was performed and data were abstracted on operative time, hospital stay, complications and success rate. The overall cost and individual cost centers at our institution for antegrade endopyelotomy, retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy, Acucise (Applied Medical Resources, Laguna Hills, California) endopyelotomy, laparoscopic pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty were compared. A decision tree model estimated the cost of treatment and followup for each modality using commercially available software. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of individual treatment variables on overall cost. Results: Based on cost center review retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy was the least costly procedure ($2,891). In the decision tree model the rank order of overall treatment costs was: retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy ($3,842), Acucise endopyelotomy ($4,427), antegrade endopyelotomy ($5,297), laparoscopic pyeloplasty ($7,026) and open pyeloplasty ($7,119). Despite various hospital stay, operative time, equipment cost and success rate data 1-way sensitivity analysis revealed that antegrade endopyelotomy, laparoscopic pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty were never cost effective compared with retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy or Acucise endopyelotomy, while 2-way sensitivity analysis favored retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy. Conclusions: Primary cost variables for ureteropelvic junction obstruction treatments include operative time, hospital stay, equipment cost and success rate. Decision tree analysis showed that retrograde ureteroscopic or Acucise endopyelotomy is the most cost-effective treatment modality at our institution. However, cost is only 1 of a number of factors that are considered when deciding on an optimal course of treatment.

KW - Cost-benefit analysis

KW - Decision trees

KW - Kidney

KW - Ureter

KW - Ureteral obstruction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037213836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037213836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 169

SP - 228

EP - 232

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 1

ER -