County-level outcomes of a rural breast cancer screening outreach strategy: a decentralized hub-and-spoke model (BSPAN2)

Simon J.Craddock Lee, Robin T. Higashi, Stephen J. Inrig, Joanne M. Sanders, Hong Zhu, Keith E. Argenbright, Jasmin A. Tiro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rural mammography screening remains suboptimal despite reimbursement programs for uninsured women. Networks linking non-clinical community organizations and clinical providers may overcome limited delivery infrastructure in rural areas. Little is known about how networks expand their service area. To evaluate a hub-and-spoke model to expand mammography services to 17 rural counties by assessing county-level delivery and local stakeholder conduct of outreach activities. We conducted a mixed-method evaluation using EMR data, systematic site visits (73 interviews, 51 organizations), 92 patient surveys, and 30 patient interviews. A two-sample t test compared the weighted monthly average of women served between hub- and spoke-led counties; nonparametric trend test evaluated time trend over the study period; Pearson chi-square compared sociodemographic data between hub- and spoke-led counties. From 2013 to 2014, the program screened 4603 underinsured women. Counties where local “spoke” organizations led outreach activities achieved comparable screening rates to hub-led counties (9.2 and 8.7, respectively, p = 0.984) and did not vary over time (p = 0.866). Qualitative analyses revealed influence of program champions, participant language preference, and stakeholders’ concerns about uncompensated care. A program that leverages local organizations’ ability to identify and reach rural underserved populations is a feasible approach for expanding preventive services delivery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)349-357
Number of pages9
JournalTranslational Behavioral Medicine
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Mammography
Breast Neoplasms
Uncompensated Care
Interviews
Aptitude
Vulnerable Populations
Rural Population
Language

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Health disparities
  • Health services delivery
  • Mixed methods
  • Program implementation
  • Rural

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

County-level outcomes of a rural breast cancer screening outreach strategy : a decentralized hub-and-spoke model (BSPAN2). / Lee, Simon J.Craddock; Higashi, Robin T.; Inrig, Stephen J.; Sanders, Joanne M.; Zhu, Hong; Argenbright, Keith E.; Tiro, Jasmin A.

In: Translational Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.06.2017, p. 349-357.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b9c07bf234f04cb2bb8fc6242ba7e51b,
title = "County-level outcomes of a rural breast cancer screening outreach strategy: a decentralized hub-and-spoke model (BSPAN2)",
abstract = "Rural mammography screening remains suboptimal despite reimbursement programs for uninsured women. Networks linking non-clinical community organizations and clinical providers may overcome limited delivery infrastructure in rural areas. Little is known about how networks expand their service area. To evaluate a hub-and-spoke model to expand mammography services to 17 rural counties by assessing county-level delivery and local stakeholder conduct of outreach activities. We conducted a mixed-method evaluation using EMR data, systematic site visits (73 interviews, 51 organizations), 92 patient surveys, and 30 patient interviews. A two-sample t test compared the weighted monthly average of women served between hub- and spoke-led counties; nonparametric trend test evaluated time trend over the study period; Pearson chi-square compared sociodemographic data between hub- and spoke-led counties. From 2013 to 2014, the program screened 4603 underinsured women. Counties where local “spoke” organizations led outreach activities achieved comparable screening rates to hub-led counties (9.2 and 8.7, respectively, p = 0.984) and did not vary over time (p = 0.866). Qualitative analyses revealed influence of program champions, participant language preference, and stakeholders’ concerns about uncompensated care. A program that leverages local organizations’ ability to identify and reach rural underserved populations is a feasible approach for expanding preventive services delivery.",
keywords = "Breast cancer, Health disparities, Health services delivery, Mixed methods, Program implementation, Rural",
author = "Lee, {Simon J.Craddock} and Higashi, {Robin T.} and Inrig, {Stephen J.} and Sanders, {Joanne M.} and Hong Zhu and Argenbright, {Keith E.} and Tiro, {Jasmin A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13142-016-0427-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "349--357",
journal = "Translational Behavioral Medicine",
issn = "1869-6716",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - County-level outcomes of a rural breast cancer screening outreach strategy

T2 - a decentralized hub-and-spoke model (BSPAN2)

AU - Lee, Simon J.Craddock

AU - Higashi, Robin T.

AU - Inrig, Stephen J.

AU - Sanders, Joanne M.

AU - Zhu, Hong

AU - Argenbright, Keith E.

AU - Tiro, Jasmin A.

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Rural mammography screening remains suboptimal despite reimbursement programs for uninsured women. Networks linking non-clinical community organizations and clinical providers may overcome limited delivery infrastructure in rural areas. Little is known about how networks expand their service area. To evaluate a hub-and-spoke model to expand mammography services to 17 rural counties by assessing county-level delivery and local stakeholder conduct of outreach activities. We conducted a mixed-method evaluation using EMR data, systematic site visits (73 interviews, 51 organizations), 92 patient surveys, and 30 patient interviews. A two-sample t test compared the weighted monthly average of women served between hub- and spoke-led counties; nonparametric trend test evaluated time trend over the study period; Pearson chi-square compared sociodemographic data between hub- and spoke-led counties. From 2013 to 2014, the program screened 4603 underinsured women. Counties where local “spoke” organizations led outreach activities achieved comparable screening rates to hub-led counties (9.2 and 8.7, respectively, p = 0.984) and did not vary over time (p = 0.866). Qualitative analyses revealed influence of program champions, participant language preference, and stakeholders’ concerns about uncompensated care. A program that leverages local organizations’ ability to identify and reach rural underserved populations is a feasible approach for expanding preventive services delivery.

AB - Rural mammography screening remains suboptimal despite reimbursement programs for uninsured women. Networks linking non-clinical community organizations and clinical providers may overcome limited delivery infrastructure in rural areas. Little is known about how networks expand their service area. To evaluate a hub-and-spoke model to expand mammography services to 17 rural counties by assessing county-level delivery and local stakeholder conduct of outreach activities. We conducted a mixed-method evaluation using EMR data, systematic site visits (73 interviews, 51 organizations), 92 patient surveys, and 30 patient interviews. A two-sample t test compared the weighted monthly average of women served between hub- and spoke-led counties; nonparametric trend test evaluated time trend over the study period; Pearson chi-square compared sociodemographic data between hub- and spoke-led counties. From 2013 to 2014, the program screened 4603 underinsured women. Counties where local “spoke” organizations led outreach activities achieved comparable screening rates to hub-led counties (9.2 and 8.7, respectively, p = 0.984) and did not vary over time (p = 0.866). Qualitative analyses revealed influence of program champions, participant language preference, and stakeholders’ concerns about uncompensated care. A program that leverages local organizations’ ability to identify and reach rural underserved populations is a feasible approach for expanding preventive services delivery.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Health disparities

KW - Health services delivery

KW - Mixed methods

KW - Program implementation

KW - Rural

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026632596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026632596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13142-016-0427-3

DO - 10.1007/s13142-016-0427-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 27402023

AN - SCOPUS:85026632596

VL - 7

SP - 349

EP - 357

JO - Translational Behavioral Medicine

JF - Translational Behavioral Medicine

SN - 1869-6716

IS - 2

ER -