Current concepts in debridement: Science and strategies

Ersilia L. Anghel, Michael V. DeFazio, Jenny C. Barker, Jeffrey E. Janis, Christopher E. Attinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The establishment of a healthy wound bed through adequate debridement of infected, senescent, and/or devitalized tissue is central to the progression of normal wound healing. Although a variety of surgical and nonsurgical strategies have been proposed, none have proven completely effective in all settings. This review focuses on the principles and techniques of modern debridement practices employed in the management of complex wounds. Methods: A comprehensive review of the PubMed/Medline and Ovid databases was performed to identify basic science and clinical studies using key words most relevant to bioflm, debridement, and wound healing. English language articles that were peer reviewed and that met the standard of evidencebased medicine were included. Level of evidence for various debridement approaches was rated utilizing the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Rating Levels of Evidence and Grading Recommendations. Results: The value of both operative and nonoperative debridement techniques, their indications, and limitations are described. With an emphasis placed on surgical debridement, this review highlights technical adjuncts that can be used to optimize wound bed preparation, including preoperative topical staining of the wound, as well as the use of color-guided endpoints to prevent removal of excess healthy tissue. The indications for using temporizing measures for wound control such as negative pressure wound therapy with and without installation are also discussed. Conclusion: Optimal management requires a multimodal approach that centers around operative debridement and incorporates the use of adjunctive measures to facilitate the removal of infected tissue, bioflm, and/or senescent cells that impede the progression of normal wound healing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)82S-93S
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume138
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Debridement
Wound Healing
Wounds and Injuries
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy
PubMed
Language
Color
Medicine
Databases
Staining and Labeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Anghel, E. L., DeFazio, M. V., Barker, J. C., Janis, J. E., & Attinger, C. E. (2016). Current concepts in debridement: Science and strategies. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 138(3), 82S-93S. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002651

Current concepts in debridement : Science and strategies. / Anghel, Ersilia L.; DeFazio, Michael V.; Barker, Jenny C.; Janis, Jeffrey E.; Attinger, Christopher E.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 138, No. 3, 2016, p. 82S-93S.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Anghel, EL, DeFazio, MV, Barker, JC, Janis, JE & Attinger, CE 2016, 'Current concepts in debridement: Science and strategies', Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 82S-93S. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002651
Anghel, Ersilia L. ; DeFazio, Michael V. ; Barker, Jenny C. ; Janis, Jeffrey E. ; Attinger, Christopher E. / Current concepts in debridement : Science and strategies. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 138, No. 3. pp. 82S-93S.
@article{83dff29945e047b2b0a2351082ccc9e7,
title = "Current concepts in debridement: Science and strategies",
abstract = "Background: The establishment of a healthy wound bed through adequate debridement of infected, senescent, and/or devitalized tissue is central to the progression of normal wound healing. Although a variety of surgical and nonsurgical strategies have been proposed, none have proven completely effective in all settings. This review focuses on the principles and techniques of modern debridement practices employed in the management of complex wounds. Methods: A comprehensive review of the PubMed/Medline and Ovid databases was performed to identify basic science and clinical studies using key words most relevant to bioflm, debridement, and wound healing. English language articles that were peer reviewed and that met the standard of evidencebased medicine were included. Level of evidence for various debridement approaches was rated utilizing the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Rating Levels of Evidence and Grading Recommendations. Results: The value of both operative and nonoperative debridement techniques, their indications, and limitations are described. With an emphasis placed on surgical debridement, this review highlights technical adjuncts that can be used to optimize wound bed preparation, including preoperative topical staining of the wound, as well as the use of color-guided endpoints to prevent removal of excess healthy tissue. The indications for using temporizing measures for wound control such as negative pressure wound therapy with and without installation are also discussed. Conclusion: Optimal management requires a multimodal approach that centers around operative debridement and incorporates the use of adjunctive measures to facilitate the removal of infected tissue, bioflm, and/or senescent cells that impede the progression of normal wound healing.",
author = "Anghel, {Ersilia L.} and DeFazio, {Michael V.} and Barker, {Jenny C.} and Janis, {Jeffrey E.} and Attinger, {Christopher E.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000002651",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "138",
pages = "82S--93S",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current concepts in debridement

T2 - Science and strategies

AU - Anghel, Ersilia L.

AU - DeFazio, Michael V.

AU - Barker, Jenny C.

AU - Janis, Jeffrey E.

AU - Attinger, Christopher E.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Background: The establishment of a healthy wound bed through adequate debridement of infected, senescent, and/or devitalized tissue is central to the progression of normal wound healing. Although a variety of surgical and nonsurgical strategies have been proposed, none have proven completely effective in all settings. This review focuses on the principles and techniques of modern debridement practices employed in the management of complex wounds. Methods: A comprehensive review of the PubMed/Medline and Ovid databases was performed to identify basic science and clinical studies using key words most relevant to bioflm, debridement, and wound healing. English language articles that were peer reviewed and that met the standard of evidencebased medicine were included. Level of evidence for various debridement approaches was rated utilizing the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Rating Levels of Evidence and Grading Recommendations. Results: The value of both operative and nonoperative debridement techniques, their indications, and limitations are described. With an emphasis placed on surgical debridement, this review highlights technical adjuncts that can be used to optimize wound bed preparation, including preoperative topical staining of the wound, as well as the use of color-guided endpoints to prevent removal of excess healthy tissue. The indications for using temporizing measures for wound control such as negative pressure wound therapy with and without installation are also discussed. Conclusion: Optimal management requires a multimodal approach that centers around operative debridement and incorporates the use of adjunctive measures to facilitate the removal of infected tissue, bioflm, and/or senescent cells that impede the progression of normal wound healing.

AB - Background: The establishment of a healthy wound bed through adequate debridement of infected, senescent, and/or devitalized tissue is central to the progression of normal wound healing. Although a variety of surgical and nonsurgical strategies have been proposed, none have proven completely effective in all settings. This review focuses on the principles and techniques of modern debridement practices employed in the management of complex wounds. Methods: A comprehensive review of the PubMed/Medline and Ovid databases was performed to identify basic science and clinical studies using key words most relevant to bioflm, debridement, and wound healing. English language articles that were peer reviewed and that met the standard of evidencebased medicine were included. Level of evidence for various debridement approaches was rated utilizing the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Rating Levels of Evidence and Grading Recommendations. Results: The value of both operative and nonoperative debridement techniques, their indications, and limitations are described. With an emphasis placed on surgical debridement, this review highlights technical adjuncts that can be used to optimize wound bed preparation, including preoperative topical staining of the wound, as well as the use of color-guided endpoints to prevent removal of excess healthy tissue. The indications for using temporizing measures for wound control such as negative pressure wound therapy with and without installation are also discussed. Conclusion: Optimal management requires a multimodal approach that centers around operative debridement and incorporates the use of adjunctive measures to facilitate the removal of infected tissue, bioflm, and/or senescent cells that impede the progression of normal wound healing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988503937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988503937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002651

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002651

M3 - Article

C2 - 27556779

AN - SCOPUS:84988503937

VL - 138

SP - 82S-93S

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 3

ER -