TY - JOUR
T1 - Design and Validation of a Low-Cost, High-Fidelity Model for Urethrovesical Anastomosis in Radical Prostatectomy
AU - Johnson, Brett A.
AU - Timberlake, Matthew
AU - Steinberg, Ryan L.
AU - Kosemund, Matthew
AU - Mueller, Bradly
AU - Gahan, Jeffrey C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - Objective: We sought to develop and validate a low-cost, high-fidelity robotic surgical model for the urethrovesical anastomosis component of the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: A novel simulation model was constructed using a 3D-printed model of the male bony pelvis from CT scan data and silicone molds to recreate the soft tissue aspects. Using a da Vinci Si surgical robot, urology faculty and trainees performed simulated urethrovesical anastomosis. Each participant was given 12 minutes to complete the simulation. A survey established face validity, content validity, and acceptability. Simulation runs were evaluated by three blinded reviewers. The anastomosis was graded by two reviewers for suture placement accuracy and anastomosis quality. These factors were compared with robotic experience to establish construct validity. Results: Twenty participants took part in the initial validation of this model. Groups were defined as experts (surgical faculty), intermediate (fellows and chief residents), and novices (junior residents). Likert scores (1-5 scale, top score 5) examining face validity, content validity, and acceptability were 3.49 ± 0.43, 4.15 ± 0.23, and 4.02 ± 0.19, respectively. Construct validity was excellent based on the model's ability to stratify groups. All evaluated metrics were statistically different between the three levels of training. Total material cost was $2.50 per model. Conclusions: We developed a novel low-cost robotic simulation of the urethrovesical anastomosis for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. The model discerns robotic skill level across all levels of training and was found favorable by participants showing excellent face, content, and construct validities.
AB - Objective: We sought to develop and validate a low-cost, high-fidelity robotic surgical model for the urethrovesical anastomosis component of the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: A novel simulation model was constructed using a 3D-printed model of the male bony pelvis from CT scan data and silicone molds to recreate the soft tissue aspects. Using a da Vinci Si surgical robot, urology faculty and trainees performed simulated urethrovesical anastomosis. Each participant was given 12 minutes to complete the simulation. A survey established face validity, content validity, and acceptability. Simulation runs were evaluated by three blinded reviewers. The anastomosis was graded by two reviewers for suture placement accuracy and anastomosis quality. These factors were compared with robotic experience to establish construct validity. Results: Twenty participants took part in the initial validation of this model. Groups were defined as experts (surgical faculty), intermediate (fellows and chief residents), and novices (junior residents). Likert scores (1-5 scale, top score 5) examining face validity, content validity, and acceptability were 3.49 ± 0.43, 4.15 ± 0.23, and 4.02 ± 0.19, respectively. Construct validity was excellent based on the model's ability to stratify groups. All evaluated metrics were statistically different between the three levels of training. Total material cost was $2.50 per model. Conclusions: We developed a novel low-cost robotic simulation of the urethrovesical anastomosis for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. The model discerns robotic skill level across all levels of training and was found favorable by participants showing excellent face, content, and construct validities.
KW - Surgical simulation
KW - da Vinci robotic surgery
KW - robotic prostatectomy
KW - urethrovesical anastomosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064203175&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064203175&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/end.2018.0871
DO - 10.1089/end.2018.0871
M3 - Article
C2 - 30734578
AN - SCOPUS:85064203175
SN - 0892-7790
VL - 33
SP - 331
EP - 336
JO - Journal of Endourology
JF - Journal of Endourology
IS - 4
ER -