Effect of 6F urethral catheterization on urinary flow rates during repeated pressure-flow studies in healthy female volunteers

Adam G. Baseman, Janet G. Baseman, Philippe E. Zimmern, Gary E. Lemack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. To prospectively examine the effect of a 6F urethral catheter on the urinary flow rate in healthy women without lower urinary tract symptoms undergoing pressure-flow studies. Methods. Women between the ages of 30 and 70 years, without lower urinary tract complaints and without a history of surgery for incontinence, were recruited. All women completed the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 questionnaire, and only women with mild or no symptoms were enrolled. After a free flow rate was determined, cystometry and pressure-flow studies were performed once and then repeated using a 6F urethral catheter. The peak flow rates during the first and second studies were compared with one another and with the nonintubated values. Results. Of the 59 women that applied, 20 volunteers (mean age 41.7 years) met the entry criteria and were evaluated. The mean nonintubated flow rate was 22.65 mL/s. With a 6F urethral catheter in place, our cohort had a mean peak flow rate of 16.25 mL/s on the first study and 15.25 mL/s on the second. A significant difference was demonstrated between the free and intubated peak flow rates for both the first (P = 0.0006) and the second (P = 0.0001) study. No significant difference was detected between the two intubated peak flow rates (P = 0.262). Conclusions. Our data suggest that the presence of a 6F urethral catheter significantly reduces the maximal flow rate compared with free flow studies. Whether these findings represent a truly obstructive effect of the catheter, detrusor fatigue, or other possible effect of the catheter remains to be elucidated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)843-846
Number of pages4
JournalUrology
Volume59
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Urinary Catheterization
Urinary Catheters
Healthy Volunteers
Pressure
Catheters
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Urinary Tract
Fatigue
Volunteers
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Effect of 6F urethral catheterization on urinary flow rates during repeated pressure-flow studies in healthy female volunteers. / Baseman, Adam G.; Baseman, Janet G.; Zimmern, Philippe E.; Lemack, Gary E.

In: Urology, Vol. 59, No. 6, 2002, p. 843-846.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7364c1114a8046fe854b76c6265438e8,
title = "Effect of 6F urethral catheterization on urinary flow rates during repeated pressure-flow studies in healthy female volunteers",
abstract = "Objectives. To prospectively examine the effect of a 6F urethral catheter on the urinary flow rate in healthy women without lower urinary tract symptoms undergoing pressure-flow studies. Methods. Women between the ages of 30 and 70 years, without lower urinary tract complaints and without a history of surgery for incontinence, were recruited. All women completed the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 questionnaire, and only women with mild or no symptoms were enrolled. After a free flow rate was determined, cystometry and pressure-flow studies were performed once and then repeated using a 6F urethral catheter. The peak flow rates during the first and second studies were compared with one another and with the nonintubated values. Results. Of the 59 women that applied, 20 volunteers (mean age 41.7 years) met the entry criteria and were evaluated. The mean nonintubated flow rate was 22.65 mL/s. With a 6F urethral catheter in place, our cohort had a mean peak flow rate of 16.25 mL/s on the first study and 15.25 mL/s on the second. A significant difference was demonstrated between the free and intubated peak flow rates for both the first (P = 0.0006) and the second (P = 0.0001) study. No significant difference was detected between the two intubated peak flow rates (P = 0.262). Conclusions. Our data suggest that the presence of a 6F urethral catheter significantly reduces the maximal flow rate compared with free flow studies. Whether these findings represent a truly obstructive effect of the catheter, detrusor fatigue, or other possible effect of the catheter remains to be elucidated.",
author = "Baseman, {Adam G.} and Baseman, {Janet G.} and Zimmern, {Philippe E.} and Lemack, {Gary E.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01600-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "843--846",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of 6F urethral catheterization on urinary flow rates during repeated pressure-flow studies in healthy female volunteers

AU - Baseman, Adam G.

AU - Baseman, Janet G.

AU - Zimmern, Philippe E.

AU - Lemack, Gary E.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Objectives. To prospectively examine the effect of a 6F urethral catheter on the urinary flow rate in healthy women without lower urinary tract symptoms undergoing pressure-flow studies. Methods. Women between the ages of 30 and 70 years, without lower urinary tract complaints and without a history of surgery for incontinence, were recruited. All women completed the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 questionnaire, and only women with mild or no symptoms were enrolled. After a free flow rate was determined, cystometry and pressure-flow studies were performed once and then repeated using a 6F urethral catheter. The peak flow rates during the first and second studies were compared with one another and with the nonintubated values. Results. Of the 59 women that applied, 20 volunteers (mean age 41.7 years) met the entry criteria and were evaluated. The mean nonintubated flow rate was 22.65 mL/s. With a 6F urethral catheter in place, our cohort had a mean peak flow rate of 16.25 mL/s on the first study and 15.25 mL/s on the second. A significant difference was demonstrated between the free and intubated peak flow rates for both the first (P = 0.0006) and the second (P = 0.0001) study. No significant difference was detected between the two intubated peak flow rates (P = 0.262). Conclusions. Our data suggest that the presence of a 6F urethral catheter significantly reduces the maximal flow rate compared with free flow studies. Whether these findings represent a truly obstructive effect of the catheter, detrusor fatigue, or other possible effect of the catheter remains to be elucidated.

AB - Objectives. To prospectively examine the effect of a 6F urethral catheter on the urinary flow rate in healthy women without lower urinary tract symptoms undergoing pressure-flow studies. Methods. Women between the ages of 30 and 70 years, without lower urinary tract complaints and without a history of surgery for incontinence, were recruited. All women completed the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 questionnaire, and only women with mild or no symptoms were enrolled. After a free flow rate was determined, cystometry and pressure-flow studies were performed once and then repeated using a 6F urethral catheter. The peak flow rates during the first and second studies were compared with one another and with the nonintubated values. Results. Of the 59 women that applied, 20 volunteers (mean age 41.7 years) met the entry criteria and were evaluated. The mean nonintubated flow rate was 22.65 mL/s. With a 6F urethral catheter in place, our cohort had a mean peak flow rate of 16.25 mL/s on the first study and 15.25 mL/s on the second. A significant difference was demonstrated between the free and intubated peak flow rates for both the first (P = 0.0006) and the second (P = 0.0001) study. No significant difference was detected between the two intubated peak flow rates (P = 0.262). Conclusions. Our data suggest that the presence of a 6F urethral catheter significantly reduces the maximal flow rate compared with free flow studies. Whether these findings represent a truly obstructive effect of the catheter, detrusor fatigue, or other possible effect of the catheter remains to be elucidated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036097367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036097367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01600-X

DO - 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01600-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 12031365

AN - SCOPUS:0036097367

VL - 59

SP - 843

EP - 846

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 6

ER -