Effect of epidural volume extension on quality of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery

A systematic review and meta-analysis

Terri Kane, Tito D. Tubog, John Peter Kane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In nonobstetric procedures, epidural volume extension (EVE) has been suggested to lower intraoperative opioid requirements while improving motor recovery when added to spinal anesthesia. This systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of EVE in elective cesarean delivery. We searched PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Review Database for randomized controlled trials evaluating EVE compared with single shot spinal and/ or combined spinal/epidural anesthesia. The primary outcomes were efficacy of EVE, as defined by the need for intraoperative opioid supplementation, and time to complete motor recovery. Eighteen randomized controlled trials consisting of 1,670 patients were evaluated. Subgroup analyses of EVE with local anesthetic were statistically significant in decreasing the need for intraoperative analgesic supplementation (risk ratio = 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13-0.68; P = .004; I 2 = 50%). Faster motor recovery was also seen (MD -24.14; 95% CI = -47.31 to -0.98; P = .04; I 2 = 98%). Sequential EVE has been affirmed as a method to decrease intraoperative opioid requirements compared with single shot spinal or combined spinal/epidural anesthesia. Improved motor recovery times were also statistically significant but should be extrapolated with caution because of high heterogeneity of the included studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-118
Number of pages10
JournalAANA Journal
Volume86
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Epidural Anesthesia
Spinal Anesthesia
Opioid Analgesics
Meta-Analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials
Confidence Intervals
Local Anesthetics
PubMed
Analgesics
Odds Ratio
Databases

Keywords

  • Cesarean section
  • Combined spinal-epidural
  • Epidural volume expansion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Effect of epidural volume extension on quality of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Kane, Terri; Tubog, Tito D.; Kane, John Peter.

In: AANA Journal, Vol. 86, No. 2, 01.04.2018, p. 109-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{32082a2edaa44c76a1299d80dc7382bc,
title = "Effect of epidural volume extension on quality of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "In nonobstetric procedures, epidural volume extension (EVE) has been suggested to lower intraoperative opioid requirements while improving motor recovery when added to spinal anesthesia. This systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of EVE in elective cesarean delivery. We searched PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Review Database for randomized controlled trials evaluating EVE compared with single shot spinal and/ or combined spinal/epidural anesthesia. The primary outcomes were efficacy of EVE, as defined by the need for intraoperative opioid supplementation, and time to complete motor recovery. Eighteen randomized controlled trials consisting of 1,670 patients were evaluated. Subgroup analyses of EVE with local anesthetic were statistically significant in decreasing the need for intraoperative analgesic supplementation (risk ratio = 0.30; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] = 0.13-0.68; P = .004; I 2 = 50{\%}). Faster motor recovery was also seen (MD -24.14; 95{\%} CI = -47.31 to -0.98; P = .04; I 2 = 98{\%}). Sequential EVE has been affirmed as a method to decrease intraoperative opioid requirements compared with single shot spinal or combined spinal/epidural anesthesia. Improved motor recovery times were also statistically significant but should be extrapolated with caution because of high heterogeneity of the included studies.",
keywords = "Cesarean section, Combined spinal-epidural, Epidural volume expansion",
author = "Terri Kane and Tubog, {Tito D.} and Kane, {John Peter}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "109--118",
journal = "AANA Journal",
issn = "0094-6354",
publisher = "AANA Publishing Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of epidural volume extension on quality of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Kane, Terri

AU - Tubog, Tito D.

AU - Kane, John Peter

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - In nonobstetric procedures, epidural volume extension (EVE) has been suggested to lower intraoperative opioid requirements while improving motor recovery when added to spinal anesthesia. This systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of EVE in elective cesarean delivery. We searched PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Review Database for randomized controlled trials evaluating EVE compared with single shot spinal and/ or combined spinal/epidural anesthesia. The primary outcomes were efficacy of EVE, as defined by the need for intraoperative opioid supplementation, and time to complete motor recovery. Eighteen randomized controlled trials consisting of 1,670 patients were evaluated. Subgroup analyses of EVE with local anesthetic were statistically significant in decreasing the need for intraoperative analgesic supplementation (risk ratio = 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13-0.68; P = .004; I 2 = 50%). Faster motor recovery was also seen (MD -24.14; 95% CI = -47.31 to -0.98; P = .04; I 2 = 98%). Sequential EVE has been affirmed as a method to decrease intraoperative opioid requirements compared with single shot spinal or combined spinal/epidural anesthesia. Improved motor recovery times were also statistically significant but should be extrapolated with caution because of high heterogeneity of the included studies.

AB - In nonobstetric procedures, epidural volume extension (EVE) has been suggested to lower intraoperative opioid requirements while improving motor recovery when added to spinal anesthesia. This systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of EVE in elective cesarean delivery. We searched PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Review Database for randomized controlled trials evaluating EVE compared with single shot spinal and/ or combined spinal/epidural anesthesia. The primary outcomes were efficacy of EVE, as defined by the need for intraoperative opioid supplementation, and time to complete motor recovery. Eighteen randomized controlled trials consisting of 1,670 patients were evaluated. Subgroup analyses of EVE with local anesthetic were statistically significant in decreasing the need for intraoperative analgesic supplementation (risk ratio = 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13-0.68; P = .004; I 2 = 50%). Faster motor recovery was also seen (MD -24.14; 95% CI = -47.31 to -0.98; P = .04; I 2 = 98%). Sequential EVE has been affirmed as a method to decrease intraoperative opioid requirements compared with single shot spinal or combined spinal/epidural anesthesia. Improved motor recovery times were also statistically significant but should be extrapolated with caution because of high heterogeneity of the included studies.

KW - Cesarean section

KW - Combined spinal-epidural

KW - Epidural volume expansion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045477617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045477617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 86

SP - 109

EP - 118

JO - AANA Journal

JF - AANA Journal

SN - 0094-6354

IS - 2

ER -