Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time

Ira H. Bernstein, Mark H. Clark, Barry A. Edelstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The stimulus events in a visual RT task consisted either of a visual (V), visual-auditory (VA), or auditory (A) signal, the latter serving as a catch signal not to be responded to. On VA trials, V and A were separated by interstimulus intervals (ISIs) ranging from 0-90 msec. in 10-msec units. RT to VA events was generally faster than RT to a V event alone and was directly related to ISI. The obtained intersensory facilitation supported previous findings by M. Hershenson and L. K. Morrell (see 41:8 and 42:9). Also, an index of facilitation previously employed by Hershenson was obtained and, as with Hershenson's study, was an inverted U-shaped function of ISI. However, an artifact was noted in Hershenson's measure. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)567-569
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology
Volume80
Issue number3 PART 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1969

Fingerprint

Artifacts

Keywords

  • visual reaction time, effects of auditory signal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Bernstein, I. H., Clark, M. H., & Edelstein, B. A. (1969). Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80(3 PART 1), 567-569. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027444

Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time. / Bernstein, Ira H.; Clark, Mark H.; Edelstein, Barry A.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 80, No. 3 PART 1, 06.1969, p. 567-569.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bernstein, IH, Clark, MH & Edelstein, BA 1969, 'Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time', Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 80, no. 3 PART 1, pp. 567-569. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027444
Bernstein, Ira H. ; Clark, Mark H. ; Edelstein, Barry A. / Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1969 ; Vol. 80, No. 3 PART 1. pp. 567-569.
@article{cc97589595ee41a594189d7360b4bf53,
title = "Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time",
abstract = "The stimulus events in a visual RT task consisted either of a visual (V), visual-auditory (VA), or auditory (A) signal, the latter serving as a catch signal not to be responded to. On VA trials, V and A were separated by interstimulus intervals (ISIs) ranging from 0-90 msec. in 10-msec units. RT to VA events was generally faster than RT to a V event alone and was directly related to ISI. The obtained intersensory facilitation supported previous findings by M. Hershenson and L. K. Morrell (see 41:8 and 42:9). Also, an index of facilitation previously employed by Hershenson was obtained and, as with Hershenson's study, was an inverted U-shaped function of ISI. However, an artifact was noted in Hershenson's measure. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "visual reaction time, effects of auditory signal",
author = "Bernstein, {Ira H.} and Clark, {Mark H.} and Edelstein, {Barry A.}",
year = "1969",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1037/h0027444",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "567--569",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology",
issn = "0022-1015",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3 PART 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time

AU - Bernstein, Ira H.

AU - Clark, Mark H.

AU - Edelstein, Barry A.

PY - 1969/6

Y1 - 1969/6

N2 - The stimulus events in a visual RT task consisted either of a visual (V), visual-auditory (VA), or auditory (A) signal, the latter serving as a catch signal not to be responded to. On VA trials, V and A were separated by interstimulus intervals (ISIs) ranging from 0-90 msec. in 10-msec units. RT to VA events was generally faster than RT to a V event alone and was directly related to ISI. The obtained intersensory facilitation supported previous findings by M. Hershenson and L. K. Morrell (see 41:8 and 42:9). Also, an index of facilitation previously employed by Hershenson was obtained and, as with Hershenson's study, was an inverted U-shaped function of ISI. However, an artifact was noted in Hershenson's measure. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - The stimulus events in a visual RT task consisted either of a visual (V), visual-auditory (VA), or auditory (A) signal, the latter serving as a catch signal not to be responded to. On VA trials, V and A were separated by interstimulus intervals (ISIs) ranging from 0-90 msec. in 10-msec units. RT to VA events was generally faster than RT to a V event alone and was directly related to ISI. The obtained intersensory facilitation supported previous findings by M. Hershenson and L. K. Morrell (see 41:8 and 42:9). Also, an index of facilitation previously employed by Hershenson was obtained and, as with Hershenson's study, was an inverted U-shaped function of ISI. However, an artifact was noted in Hershenson's measure. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - visual reaction time, effects of auditory signal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0014524291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0014524291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/h0027444

DO - 10.1037/h0027444

M3 - Article

C2 - 5786157

AN - SCOPUS:0014524291

VL - 80

SP - 567

EP - 569

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology

SN - 0022-1015

IS - 3 PART 1

ER -