Elucidating patient-perceived role in “decision-making” among African Americans receiving lung cancer care through a county safety-net system

Simon Craddock Lee, Emily G. Marks, Joanne M. Sanders, Deborah J. Wiebe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We explored patient-perceived role in “decision-making” related to active treatment and palliation among African Americans receiving lung cancer care through a county safety-net system. Methods: Drawing from a cohort of over 100 African Americans treated in a safety-net hospital, we invited a subsample of 13 patient-caregiver dyads to participate in a series of dyadic, ethnographic interviews conducted at the patients’ homes. Over 40 h of transcripts were analyzed in an iterative process resulting in reported themes. Results: Findings from ethnographic interviews demonstrated that healthcare communication with physicians is difficult for patients. While caregivers and patients describe a deep engagement in lung cancer care, they expressed a concurrent lack of understanding of their prognosis and outcomes of treatment. Dyads did not discuss their lung cancer experience in terms of decision-making; rather, most articulated their role as following physician guidance. Distinct lack of understanding about disease course, severity, and prognosis may constrain patient perception of the need for informed decision-making over the course of care. Conclusions: Dyadic interviews detailing safety-net patient experiences of lung cancer care raise important questions about how clinicians, as well as researchers, conceptualize processes of informed decision-making in vulnerable populations. Implications for Cancer Survivors: Safety-net patients may not perceive their role as involving informed decision-making and further may lack understanding of disease course and individual prognosis. Safety-net patient dyads expressed high involvement in care and a desire for clarity; clinicians should be prepared to clearly communicate disease stage and prognosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)153-163
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Cancer Survivorship
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

African Americans
Lung Neoplasms
Decision Making
Safety
Patient Safety
Interviews
Caregivers
Safety-net Providers
Physicians
Vulnerable Populations
Survivors
Communication
Research Personnel
Delivery of Health Care
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Decision-making
  • Lung cancer
  • Patient-physician communication
  • Qualitative methods
  • Safety-net

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Oncology(nursing)

Cite this

Elucidating patient-perceived role in “decision-making” among African Americans receiving lung cancer care through a county safety-net system. / Lee, Simon Craddock; Marks, Emily G.; Sanders, Joanne M.; Wiebe, Deborah J.

In: Journal of Cancer Survivorship, Vol. 10, No. 1, 01.02.2016, p. 153-163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c1c53ddfcdca48a0b75a48c16f76c3a7,
title = "Elucidating patient-perceived role in “decision-making” among African Americans receiving lung cancer care through a county safety-net system",
abstract = "Purpose: We explored patient-perceived role in “decision-making” related to active treatment and palliation among African Americans receiving lung cancer care through a county safety-net system. Methods: Drawing from a cohort of over 100 African Americans treated in a safety-net hospital, we invited a subsample of 13 patient-caregiver dyads to participate in a series of dyadic, ethnographic interviews conducted at the patients’ homes. Over 40 h of transcripts were analyzed in an iterative process resulting in reported themes. Results: Findings from ethnographic interviews demonstrated that healthcare communication with physicians is difficult for patients. While caregivers and patients describe a deep engagement in lung cancer care, they expressed a concurrent lack of understanding of their prognosis and outcomes of treatment. Dyads did not discuss their lung cancer experience in terms of decision-making; rather, most articulated their role as following physician guidance. Distinct lack of understanding about disease course, severity, and prognosis may constrain patient perception of the need for informed decision-making over the course of care. Conclusions: Dyadic interviews detailing safety-net patient experiences of lung cancer care raise important questions about how clinicians, as well as researchers, conceptualize processes of informed decision-making in vulnerable populations. Implications for Cancer Survivors: Safety-net patients may not perceive their role as involving informed decision-making and further may lack understanding of disease course and individual prognosis. Safety-net patient dyads expressed high involvement in care and a desire for clarity; clinicians should be prepared to clearly communicate disease stage and prognosis.",
keywords = "Decision-making, Lung cancer, Patient-physician communication, Qualitative methods, Safety-net",
author = "Lee, {Simon Craddock} and Marks, {Emily G.} and Sanders, {Joanne M.} and Wiebe, {Deborah J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11764-015-0461-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "153--163",
journal = "Journal of Cancer Survivorship",
issn = "1932-2259",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Elucidating patient-perceived role in “decision-making” among African Americans receiving lung cancer care through a county safety-net system

AU - Lee, Simon Craddock

AU - Marks, Emily G.

AU - Sanders, Joanne M.

AU - Wiebe, Deborah J.

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Purpose: We explored patient-perceived role in “decision-making” related to active treatment and palliation among African Americans receiving lung cancer care through a county safety-net system. Methods: Drawing from a cohort of over 100 African Americans treated in a safety-net hospital, we invited a subsample of 13 patient-caregiver dyads to participate in a series of dyadic, ethnographic interviews conducted at the patients’ homes. Over 40 h of transcripts were analyzed in an iterative process resulting in reported themes. Results: Findings from ethnographic interviews demonstrated that healthcare communication with physicians is difficult for patients. While caregivers and patients describe a deep engagement in lung cancer care, they expressed a concurrent lack of understanding of their prognosis and outcomes of treatment. Dyads did not discuss their lung cancer experience in terms of decision-making; rather, most articulated their role as following physician guidance. Distinct lack of understanding about disease course, severity, and prognosis may constrain patient perception of the need for informed decision-making over the course of care. Conclusions: Dyadic interviews detailing safety-net patient experiences of lung cancer care raise important questions about how clinicians, as well as researchers, conceptualize processes of informed decision-making in vulnerable populations. Implications for Cancer Survivors: Safety-net patients may not perceive their role as involving informed decision-making and further may lack understanding of disease course and individual prognosis. Safety-net patient dyads expressed high involvement in care and a desire for clarity; clinicians should be prepared to clearly communicate disease stage and prognosis.

AB - Purpose: We explored patient-perceived role in “decision-making” related to active treatment and palliation among African Americans receiving lung cancer care through a county safety-net system. Methods: Drawing from a cohort of over 100 African Americans treated in a safety-net hospital, we invited a subsample of 13 patient-caregiver dyads to participate in a series of dyadic, ethnographic interviews conducted at the patients’ homes. Over 40 h of transcripts were analyzed in an iterative process resulting in reported themes. Results: Findings from ethnographic interviews demonstrated that healthcare communication with physicians is difficult for patients. While caregivers and patients describe a deep engagement in lung cancer care, they expressed a concurrent lack of understanding of their prognosis and outcomes of treatment. Dyads did not discuss their lung cancer experience in terms of decision-making; rather, most articulated their role as following physician guidance. Distinct lack of understanding about disease course, severity, and prognosis may constrain patient perception of the need for informed decision-making over the course of care. Conclusions: Dyadic interviews detailing safety-net patient experiences of lung cancer care raise important questions about how clinicians, as well as researchers, conceptualize processes of informed decision-making in vulnerable populations. Implications for Cancer Survivors: Safety-net patients may not perceive their role as involving informed decision-making and further may lack understanding of disease course and individual prognosis. Safety-net patient dyads expressed high involvement in care and a desire for clarity; clinicians should be prepared to clearly communicate disease stage and prognosis.

KW - Decision-making

KW - Lung cancer

KW - Patient-physician communication

KW - Qualitative methods

KW - Safety-net

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953635392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953635392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11764-015-0461-z

DO - 10.1007/s11764-015-0461-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 26076590

AN - SCOPUS:84953635392

VL - 10

SP - 153

EP - 163

JO - Journal of Cancer Survivorship

JF - Journal of Cancer Survivorship

SN - 1932-2259

IS - 1

ER -