Evidence-based performance measures for emergency medical services systems: A model for expanded EMS benchmarking

J. Brent Myers, Corey M. Slovis, Marc Eckstein, Jeffrey M. Goodloe, S. Marshal Isaacs, James R. Loflin, C. Crawford Mechem, Neal J. Richmond, Paul E. Pepe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are few evidence-based measures of emergency medical services (EMS) system performance. In many jurisdictions, response-time intervals for advanced life support units and resuscitation rates for victims of cardiac arrest are the primary measures of EMS system performance. The association of the former with patient outcomes is not supported explicitly by the medical literature, while the latter focuses on a very small proportion of the EMS patient population and thus does not represent a sufficiently broad selection of patients. While these metrics have their place in performance measurement, a more robust method to measure and benchmark EMS performance is needed. The 2007 U.S. Metropolitan Municipalties' EMS Medical Directors' Consortium has developed the following model that encompasses a broader range of clinical situations, including myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, bronchospasm, status epilepticus, and trauma. Where possible, the benefit conferred by EMS interventions is presented in the number needed to treat format. It is hoped that utilization of this model will serve to improve EMS system design and deployment strategies while enhancing the benchmarking and sharing of best practices among EMS systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)141-151
Number of pages11
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2008

Fingerprint

Benchmarking
Emergency Medical Services
Physician Executives
Numbers Needed To Treat
Bronchial Spasm
Status Epilepticus
Pulmonary Edema
Heart Arrest
Practice Guidelines
Resuscitation
Patient Selection
Reaction Time
Myocardial Infarction
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Asthma
  • Emergency medical services
  • Evidence based medicine
  • Paramedics
  • Performance improvement
  • Pulmonary edema
  • Quality assurance
  • Status epilepticus
  • STEMI, acute myocardial syndrome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Evidence-based performance measures for emergency medical services systems : A model for expanded EMS benchmarking. / Myers, J. Brent; Slovis, Corey M.; Eckstein, Marc; Goodloe, Jeffrey M.; Isaacs, S. Marshal; Loflin, James R.; Mechem, C. Crawford; Richmond, Neal J.; Pepe, Paul E.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 12, No. 2, 04.2008, p. 141-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Myers, J. Brent ; Slovis, Corey M. ; Eckstein, Marc ; Goodloe, Jeffrey M. ; Isaacs, S. Marshal ; Loflin, James R. ; Mechem, C. Crawford ; Richmond, Neal J. ; Pepe, Paul E. / Evidence-based performance measures for emergency medical services systems : A model for expanded EMS benchmarking. In: Prehospital Emergency Care. 2008 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 141-151.
@article{b499cc8be4b74fa0a5b8310e33e804a9,
title = "Evidence-based performance measures for emergency medical services systems: A model for expanded EMS benchmarking",
abstract = "There are few evidence-based measures of emergency medical services (EMS) system performance. In many jurisdictions, response-time intervals for advanced life support units and resuscitation rates for victims of cardiac arrest are the primary measures of EMS system performance. The association of the former with patient outcomes is not supported explicitly by the medical literature, while the latter focuses on a very small proportion of the EMS patient population and thus does not represent a sufficiently broad selection of patients. While these metrics have their place in performance measurement, a more robust method to measure and benchmark EMS performance is needed. The 2007 U.S. Metropolitan Municipalties' EMS Medical Directors' Consortium has developed the following model that encompasses a broader range of clinical situations, including myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, bronchospasm, status epilepticus, and trauma. Where possible, the benefit conferred by EMS interventions is presented in the number needed to treat format. It is hoped that utilization of this model will serve to improve EMS system design and deployment strategies while enhancing the benchmarking and sharing of best practices among EMS systems.",
keywords = "Asthma, Emergency medical services, Evidence based medicine, Paramedics, Performance improvement, Pulmonary edema, Quality assurance, Status epilepticus, STEMI, acute myocardial syndrome",
author = "Myers, {J. Brent} and Slovis, {Corey M.} and Marc Eckstein and Goodloe, {Jeffrey M.} and Isaacs, {S. Marshal} and Loflin, {James R.} and Mechem, {C. Crawford} and Richmond, {Neal J.} and Pepe, {Paul E.}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/10903120801903793",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "141--151",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence-based performance measures for emergency medical services systems

T2 - A model for expanded EMS benchmarking

AU - Myers, J. Brent

AU - Slovis, Corey M.

AU - Eckstein, Marc

AU - Goodloe, Jeffrey M.

AU - Isaacs, S. Marshal

AU - Loflin, James R.

AU - Mechem, C. Crawford

AU - Richmond, Neal J.

AU - Pepe, Paul E.

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - There are few evidence-based measures of emergency medical services (EMS) system performance. In many jurisdictions, response-time intervals for advanced life support units and resuscitation rates for victims of cardiac arrest are the primary measures of EMS system performance. The association of the former with patient outcomes is not supported explicitly by the medical literature, while the latter focuses on a very small proportion of the EMS patient population and thus does not represent a sufficiently broad selection of patients. While these metrics have their place in performance measurement, a more robust method to measure and benchmark EMS performance is needed. The 2007 U.S. Metropolitan Municipalties' EMS Medical Directors' Consortium has developed the following model that encompasses a broader range of clinical situations, including myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, bronchospasm, status epilepticus, and trauma. Where possible, the benefit conferred by EMS interventions is presented in the number needed to treat format. It is hoped that utilization of this model will serve to improve EMS system design and deployment strategies while enhancing the benchmarking and sharing of best practices among EMS systems.

AB - There are few evidence-based measures of emergency medical services (EMS) system performance. In many jurisdictions, response-time intervals for advanced life support units and resuscitation rates for victims of cardiac arrest are the primary measures of EMS system performance. The association of the former with patient outcomes is not supported explicitly by the medical literature, while the latter focuses on a very small proportion of the EMS patient population and thus does not represent a sufficiently broad selection of patients. While these metrics have their place in performance measurement, a more robust method to measure and benchmark EMS performance is needed. The 2007 U.S. Metropolitan Municipalties' EMS Medical Directors' Consortium has developed the following model that encompasses a broader range of clinical situations, including myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, bronchospasm, status epilepticus, and trauma. Where possible, the benefit conferred by EMS interventions is presented in the number needed to treat format. It is hoped that utilization of this model will serve to improve EMS system design and deployment strategies while enhancing the benchmarking and sharing of best practices among EMS systems.

KW - Asthma

KW - Emergency medical services

KW - Evidence based medicine

KW - Paramedics

KW - Performance improvement

KW - Pulmonary edema

KW - Quality assurance

KW - Status epilepticus

KW - STEMI, acute myocardial syndrome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41649120155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41649120155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10903120801903793

DO - 10.1080/10903120801903793

M3 - Article

C2 - 18379908

AN - SCOPUS:41649120155

VL - 12

SP - 141

EP - 151

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 2

ER -