For the past two decades, prehospital trauma care has been addressed almost generically in terms of the related approaches to epidemiology, research, and management. However, evolving directions in research have helped emergency medical services (EMS) practitioners to delineate more focused treatment strategies according to the mechanisms of injury, anatomic involvement, and the patient's clinical condition. Recent studies in the areas of trauma-associated circulatory arrest, severe blunt head injury, and post-traumatic hemorrhage following penetrating truncal injury suggest that current standard approaches to patient care should be reconsidered. In turn, this need for re-examination of trauma management strategies calls for the development of appropriate evaluation tools within EMS systems. Proper research design is dependent upon several key issues including: 1) the type of study (system study versus examination of a specific intervention); 2) the population under study; 3) physiological and anatomical scoring method; 4) prospective definitions of interventions and meaningful outcome variables (both morbidity and mortality); 5) relative outcome compared to known standards; and 6) prospective determination of statistical requirements.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||10|
|Journal||Prehospital and disaster medicine : the official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the World Association for Emergency and Disaster Medicine in association with the Acute Care Foundation|
|Issue number||1 Suppl|
|State||Published - Jan 1 1993|
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Emergency Medicine