Facelift and patterns of lymphatic drainage

Ricardo A. Meade, Sumeet S. Teotia, Landis K. Griffeth, Fritz E. Barton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: It has commonly been assumed that deeper facelift dissection causes greater and more prolonged swelling. Objectives: In this preliminary report, the authors compare the lymphatic reconstitution after multiple techniques of rhytidectomy by means of dynamic lymphoscintigraphy. Methods: Three patients were enrolled in this study. All three were female, were similar in age, and exhibited similar signs and degrees of facial aging. Each woman underwent a facelift with a different technique: (1) subcutaneous dissection with superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) plication, (2) subcutaneous dissection with SMASectomy, and (3) a "high SMAS" composite facelift. Postoperatively, 99mTc-sulfur colloid was injected into a standardized infraorbital location in each patient to compare patterns of lymphatic drainage using lymphoscintigraphy. Postoperative scans at two weeks, six weeks, three months, six months, and one year were compared to the preoperative scans taken seven days prior to surgery. Results: All rhytidectomy techniques appeared to temporarily create a significant and similar degree of interruption in lymphatic drainage. There was a subtotal recovery of lymphatic pathways within three months and complete return to baseline drainage pattern after six months, regardless of surgical technique. Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, it appears that the extent of facial dissection, rather than the depth, is the most significant factor in postoperative edema.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-45
Number of pages7
JournalAesthetic Surgery Journal
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Rhytidoplasty
Drainage
Dissection
Lymphoscintigraphy
Colloids
Sulfur
Edema

Keywords

  • Extended SMAS
  • SMAS
  • SMAS plication
  • SMASectomy
  • Sub-SMAS
  • Subcutaneous facelift

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Facelift and patterns of lymphatic drainage. / Meade, Ricardo A.; Teotia, Sumeet S.; Griffeth, Landis K.; Barton, Fritz E.

In: Aesthetic Surgery Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 39-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meade, Ricardo A. ; Teotia, Sumeet S. ; Griffeth, Landis K. ; Barton, Fritz E. / Facelift and patterns of lymphatic drainage. In: Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2012 ; Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 39-45.
@article{0d18a81e5a2043b989d5c9ca8dfd8aee,
title = "Facelift and patterns of lymphatic drainage",
abstract = "Background: It has commonly been assumed that deeper facelift dissection causes greater and more prolonged swelling. Objectives: In this preliminary report, the authors compare the lymphatic reconstitution after multiple techniques of rhytidectomy by means of dynamic lymphoscintigraphy. Methods: Three patients were enrolled in this study. All three were female, were similar in age, and exhibited similar signs and degrees of facial aging. Each woman underwent a facelift with a different technique: (1) subcutaneous dissection with superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) plication, (2) subcutaneous dissection with SMASectomy, and (3) a {"}high SMAS{"} composite facelift. Postoperatively, 99mTc-sulfur colloid was injected into a standardized infraorbital location in each patient to compare patterns of lymphatic drainage using lymphoscintigraphy. Postoperative scans at two weeks, six weeks, three months, six months, and one year were compared to the preoperative scans taken seven days prior to surgery. Results: All rhytidectomy techniques appeared to temporarily create a significant and similar degree of interruption in lymphatic drainage. There was a subtotal recovery of lymphatic pathways within three months and complete return to baseline drainage pattern after six months, regardless of surgical technique. Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, it appears that the extent of facial dissection, rather than the depth, is the most significant factor in postoperative edema.",
keywords = "Extended SMAS, SMAS, SMAS plication, SMASectomy, Sub-SMAS, Subcutaneous facelift",
author = "Meade, {Ricardo A.} and Teotia, {Sumeet S.} and Griffeth, {Landis K.} and Barton, {Fritz E.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1090820X11430683",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "39--45",
journal = "Aesthetic Surgery Journal",
issn = "1090-820X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Facelift and patterns of lymphatic drainage

AU - Meade, Ricardo A.

AU - Teotia, Sumeet S.

AU - Griffeth, Landis K.

AU - Barton, Fritz E.

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Background: It has commonly been assumed that deeper facelift dissection causes greater and more prolonged swelling. Objectives: In this preliminary report, the authors compare the lymphatic reconstitution after multiple techniques of rhytidectomy by means of dynamic lymphoscintigraphy. Methods: Three patients were enrolled in this study. All three were female, were similar in age, and exhibited similar signs and degrees of facial aging. Each woman underwent a facelift with a different technique: (1) subcutaneous dissection with superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) plication, (2) subcutaneous dissection with SMASectomy, and (3) a "high SMAS" composite facelift. Postoperatively, 99mTc-sulfur colloid was injected into a standardized infraorbital location in each patient to compare patterns of lymphatic drainage using lymphoscintigraphy. Postoperative scans at two weeks, six weeks, three months, six months, and one year were compared to the preoperative scans taken seven days prior to surgery. Results: All rhytidectomy techniques appeared to temporarily create a significant and similar degree of interruption in lymphatic drainage. There was a subtotal recovery of lymphatic pathways within three months and complete return to baseline drainage pattern after six months, regardless of surgical technique. Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, it appears that the extent of facial dissection, rather than the depth, is the most significant factor in postoperative edema.

AB - Background: It has commonly been assumed that deeper facelift dissection causes greater and more prolonged swelling. Objectives: In this preliminary report, the authors compare the lymphatic reconstitution after multiple techniques of rhytidectomy by means of dynamic lymphoscintigraphy. Methods: Three patients were enrolled in this study. All three were female, were similar in age, and exhibited similar signs and degrees of facial aging. Each woman underwent a facelift with a different technique: (1) subcutaneous dissection with superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) plication, (2) subcutaneous dissection with SMASectomy, and (3) a "high SMAS" composite facelift. Postoperatively, 99mTc-sulfur colloid was injected into a standardized infraorbital location in each patient to compare patterns of lymphatic drainage using lymphoscintigraphy. Postoperative scans at two weeks, six weeks, three months, six months, and one year were compared to the preoperative scans taken seven days prior to surgery. Results: All rhytidectomy techniques appeared to temporarily create a significant and similar degree of interruption in lymphatic drainage. There was a subtotal recovery of lymphatic pathways within three months and complete return to baseline drainage pattern after six months, regardless of surgical technique. Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, it appears that the extent of facial dissection, rather than the depth, is the most significant factor in postoperative edema.

KW - Extended SMAS

KW - SMAS

KW - SMAS plication

KW - SMASectomy

KW - Sub-SMAS

KW - Subcutaneous facelift

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858212194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858212194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1090820X11430683

DO - 10.1177/1090820X11430683

M3 - Article

C2 - 22231411

AN - SCOPUS:84858212194

VL - 32

SP - 39

EP - 45

JO - Aesthetic Surgery Journal

JF - Aesthetic Surgery Journal

SN - 1090-820X

IS - 1

ER -